Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Binkley–Sellars Correspondence, 1956–1959

View through CrossRef
Abstract This correspondence with Robert Binkley primarily concerns the 1956 (Methodos) version of “Intention, Imperatives, and the Logic of ‘Ought’” (IIO). Sellars and Binkley are chiefly concerned with two issues here. The first is with universalizability: For example, how does it follow from the fact that the good of society requires that people generally do A, that I should do A? Sellars argues that moral claims issue “inference tickets” of the form, “P is a person in C” implies “Shall [P doing A]” The second main issue Sellars and Binkley discuss is reasoning among intentions. Sellars and Binkley both introduce versions of the “Shall”-operator (a device Sellars did not employ in IIO), and suggest rules governing this operator.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: The Binkley–Sellars Correspondence, 1956–1959
Description:
Abstract This correspondence with Robert Binkley primarily concerns the 1956 (Methodos) version of “Intention, Imperatives, and the Logic of ‘Ought’” (IIO).
Sellars and Binkley are chiefly concerned with two issues here.
The first is with universalizability: For example, how does it follow from the fact that the good of society requires that people generally do A, that I should do A? Sellars argues that moral claims issue “inference tickets” of the form, “P is a person in C” implies “Shall [P doing A]” The second main issue Sellars and Binkley discuss is reasoning among intentions.
Sellars and Binkley both introduce versions of the “Shall”-operator (a device Sellars did not employ in IIO), and suggest rules governing this operator.

Related Results

The Castañeda–Sellars Correspondence, 1956–1967
The Castañeda–Sellars Correspondence, 1956–1967
Abstract This correspondence consists of letters exchanged between Sellars and Hector-Neri Castañeda in 1956 and 1967. The 1956 correspondence deals primarily with t...
Sellars, Wilfrid Stalker (1912–89)
Sellars, Wilfrid Stalker (1912–89)
Wilfrid Sellars was an original, systematic philosopher in post-Second World War America. At a time when many thought of philosophy as piecemeal puzzle-solving, Sellars sought to d...
Covid Conversations 1: Peter Sellars
Covid Conversations 1: Peter Sellars
In this profoundly dialogical exchange, Peter Sellars, theatre director, researcher, and teacher, and Maria Shevtsova open out a whole array of questions on the integral relation b...
The Son and the Daughter: On Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan
The Son and the Daughter: On Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan
Abstract The positions of Brandom and Millikan are compared with respect to their common origins in the works of Wilfrid Sellars and Wittgenstein. Millikan takes mor...
The father, the son, and the daughter: Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan
The father, the son, and the daughter: Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan
The positions of Brandom and Millikan are compared with respect to their common origins in the works of Wilfrid Sellars and Wittgenstein. Millikan takes more seriously the “picturi...
Wilfrid Sellars: Fusing the Images
Wilfrid Sellars: Fusing the Images
Abstract Wilfrid Sellars was and remains one of the most prominent and important twentieth-century philosophers: his writings played a key role in shaping the philos...
Sellars and Quine: Compare and Contrast
Sellars and Quine: Compare and Contrast
Abstract W. V. O. Quine and Wilfrid Sellars are arguably the most important and influential American philosophers of the second half of the twentieth century. The pu...

Back to Top