Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Conservation biology and conservation paleobiology meet the Anthropocene together: history matters
View through CrossRef
As a species, we have reached a tipping point for Earth derived from our unsustainable resource use. While conservation efforts occurred early in human civilization, it was not until 1980 that the full force of environmental destruction, including the Santa Barbara oil spill in the 1970s, culminated in the new discipline of conservation biology focused on the biosphere. Similarly, conservation paleobiology, named two decades later, brings the unique perspective of the fossil record to conservation efforts, uniting biosphere and geosphere scientists. To date, conservation history does not include paleontological or geological perspectives. Further, each discipline has a different benchmark
—near time
—for when Earth’s ecosystems were modified by humans. Accordingly, the history of conservation efforts leading up to conservation biology and conservation paleobiology was examined from a geological and ecological framework. To provide a benchmark for near time, the hominin record and their geo-environmental modifications were also examined and revealed that by the start of the Holocene, all continents except ice-covered Antarctica and Greenland had human-modified ecosystems. Therefore, near time is dispensable when the Holocene Epoch is universally understood and precisely defined as a time when
H. sapiens
dominated environments. Lastly, a conservation corps is urgently needed, following the long tradition of F.D. R.’s Civilian Conservation Corps of the 1930s and J.F. Kennedy’s Peace Corps of the 1960s, to promote a global network connecting all students and practitioners of conservation disciplines to focus on biotic resilience, recovery, and solutions for the world’s most pressing environmental problems.
Title: Conservation biology and conservation paleobiology meet the Anthropocene together: history matters
Description:
As a species, we have reached a tipping point for Earth derived from our unsustainable resource use.
While conservation efforts occurred early in human civilization, it was not until 1980 that the full force of environmental destruction, including the Santa Barbara oil spill in the 1970s, culminated in the new discipline of conservation biology focused on the biosphere.
Similarly, conservation paleobiology, named two decades later, brings the unique perspective of the fossil record to conservation efforts, uniting biosphere and geosphere scientists.
To date, conservation history does not include paleontological or geological perspectives.
Further, each discipline has a different benchmark
—near time
—for when Earth’s ecosystems were modified by humans.
Accordingly, the history of conservation efforts leading up to conservation biology and conservation paleobiology was examined from a geological and ecological framework.
To provide a benchmark for near time, the hominin record and their geo-environmental modifications were also examined and revealed that by the start of the Holocene, all continents except ice-covered Antarctica and Greenland had human-modified ecosystems.
Therefore, near time is dispensable when the Holocene Epoch is universally understood and precisely defined as a time when
H.
sapiens
dominated environments.
Lastly, a conservation corps is urgently needed, following the long tradition of F.
D.
R.
’s Civilian Conservation Corps of the 1930s and J.
F.
Kennedy’s Peace Corps of the 1960s, to promote a global network connecting all students and practitioners of conservation disciplines to focus on biotic resilience, recovery, and solutions for the world’s most pressing environmental problems.
Related Results
What rejecting the Anthropocene means for the microplastic research community?
What rejecting the Anthropocene means for the microplastic research community?
It is well known that the Anthropocene Working Group proposed the addition of the Anthropocene as a time interval to the International Chronostratigraphic Chart (ICC). Despite the ...
The Hybrid Breeding of Nanomedia
The Hybrid Breeding of Nanomedia
IntroductionIf human beings have become a geophysical force, capable of impacting the very crust and atmosphere of the planet, and if geophysical forces become objects of study, pr...
Defining the Anthropocene for the greatest good as an Event-based Renaissance
Defining the Anthropocene for the greatest good as an Event-based Renaissance
Paul Crutzen’s concept of the Anthropocene in Nature in 2002 stressed that “a daunting task [lay] ahead for scientists and engineers to guide society towards en...
The Anthropocene as rupture
The Anthropocene as rupture
I argue that Earth System science – a recent paradigm shift in the earth and life sciences (Hamilton C and Grinevald J (2015) Was the Anthropocene anticipated? The Anthropocene Rev...
The most consequential ethical decision for geoscience 
The most consequential ethical decision for geoscience 
A geological definition of the Anthropocene, shorthand for humanity’s cumulative disruption of the Earth-Human Ecosystem, looms as the planet-and-people focused UN approa...
The Future in Anthropocene Science
The Future in Anthropocene Science
The Anthropocene is the present time of human-caused accelerating global change, and new forms of Anthropocene risk are emerging that society has hitherto never experienced. Scienc...
The future of Caribbean endemic bird conservation in the Anthropocene
The future of Caribbean endemic bird conservation in the Anthropocene
Abstract The insular Caribbean is a globally important hotspot of biological endemism, including 186 endemic bird species. Despite this importance, many of these species are highl...
Paleobiology: Instructions for Contributors
Paleobiology: Instructions for Contributors
Paleobiology
publishes original contributions dealing with any biological aspect of the history of life. Emphasis is placed on biological or paleobiological pro...

