Javascript must be enabled to continue!
ABUSE OF PROCEDURAL RIGHTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
View through CrossRef
The article is devoted to the study of the content of such a legal phenomenon as the abuse of procedural rights in the implementation of administrative proceedings. Quite often, during the direct administration of justice by administrative courts, there are cases when the parties or other participants in the proceedings abuse their procedural rights. They use them to achieve their own selfish goals: deliberately delaying the administrative process; restriction of rights or the possibility of their realization by other participants in the proceedings; going to court with unfounded lawsuits, etc. This attitude is a neglect of the right of man and citizen to adequate judicial protection, enshrined in the Article 55 of the Constitution of Ukraine. The authors set out to investigate the issue of abuse of procedural rights in administrative proceedings. This will help prevent such actions in practice, ensure effective protection of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals in the field of public relations. It is established that the current administrative procedural legislation of Ukraine does not reveal the essence of the concept. The main approaches of scientists to understanding this definition are analyzed. Based on the analyzed definitions, the authors come to the conclusion that the abuse of procedural rights in administrative proceedings should be understood as the unfair exercise by litigants of their rights to achieve personal selfish goals that are incompatible with the purpose of administrative proceedings and are not related to the content person procedural rights, and with the process and the possibility of their implementation. The most controversial issue is the qualification of actions that can be considered abuse, as Article 45 of the Code Administrative proceedings of Ukraine contains a list of only the most common types of abuse, and, therefore, the court is empowered to recognize such abuse as any action that has the appropriate direction and nature. The sanctions that the administrative court may apply in case of detection of such illegal actions are outlined. The authors propose to establish clear criteria for the classification of abuse of procedural rights, which will lead to the same case law and reduce the number of cases where the abuse will be classified incorrectly.
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
Title: ABUSE OF PROCEDURAL RIGHTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
Description:
The article is devoted to the study of the content of such a legal phenomenon as the abuse of procedural rights in the implementation of administrative proceedings.
Quite often, during the direct administration of justice by administrative courts, there are cases when the parties or other participants in the proceedings abuse their procedural rights.
They use them to achieve their own selfish goals: deliberately delaying the administrative process; restriction of rights or the possibility of their realization by other participants in the proceedings; going to court with unfounded lawsuits, etc.
This attitude is a neglect of the right of man and citizen to adequate judicial protection, enshrined in the Article 55 of the Constitution of Ukraine.
The authors set out to investigate the issue of abuse of procedural rights in administrative proceedings.
This will help prevent such actions in practice, ensure effective protection of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals in the field of public relations.
It is established that the current administrative procedural legislation of Ukraine does not reveal the essence of the concept.
The main approaches of scientists to understanding this definition are analyzed.
Based on the analyzed definitions, the authors come to the conclusion that the abuse of procedural rights in administrative proceedings should be understood as the unfair exercise by litigants of their rights to achieve personal selfish goals that are incompatible with the purpose of administrative proceedings and are not related to the content person procedural rights, and with the process and the possibility of their implementation.
The most controversial issue is the qualification of actions that can be considered abuse, as Article 45 of the Code Administrative proceedings of Ukraine contains a list of only the most common types of abuse, and, therefore, the court is empowered to recognize such abuse as any action that has the appropriate direction and nature.
The sanctions that the administrative court may apply in case of detection of such illegal actions are outlined.
The authors propose to establish clear criteria for the classification of abuse of procedural rights, which will lead to the same case law and reduce the number of cases where the abuse will be classified incorrectly.
Related Results
How to better tackle Elder Abuse in Belgium?
How to better tackle Elder Abuse in Belgium?
SCIENTIFIC REPORT 30 -- CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 30 -- 1 CONTEXT AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTION 30 -- 2 SCOPE, OBJECTIVES AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 32 -- 3 METHODOLOGY 33 -- 4 DEFINITIONS 33 ...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
E-071 Organization of a Neurointerventional Fellowship Curriculum
E-071 Organization of a Neurointerventional Fellowship Curriculum
Introduction
The field of Neurointervention has attracted some of the very best physicians across the world. Given the interdisciplinary nature of this specialty,...
ABUSE OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL RIGHTS
ABUSE OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL RIGHTS
In the article, the authors reveal a topical issue in the field of civil procedural law, which concerns the abuse of civil procedural rights. Abuse of procedural rights is a signif...
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
The European “refugee crisis” of today may lead to tomorrow’s integration difficulties. The large-scale influx of refugees has brought and is bringing many who, unless the situatio...
Seliverstova Yu.A. Administration process and administrative proceedings: problems and future
Seliverstova Yu.A. Administration process and administrative proceedings: problems and future
The subject is administrative proceedings in the system of judicial proceedings used in Russia.The purpose of the article is definition of the essence of both legal proceedings in ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Administrative Law as the New Federalism
Administrative Law as the New Federalism
Few doubt the tremendous impact the modern national administrative state has had on our federal system. Yet the relationship between federalism and administrative law remains stra...

