Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Racial and Ethnic Backgrounds of U.S. Randomized Controlled Trials in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comparison to U.S. General Population: A Retrospective Review

View through CrossRef
Objective: To determine if the racial and ethnic compositions of the participants in Obstetrics and Gynecology randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in the U.S. match that of the general U.S. population. Design: Retrospective analysis of U.S. RCTs. Setting: United States. Population: Women enrolled in U.S. RCTs. Methods: Racial and ethnic composition of RCT participants published in two premier US journals, Obstetrics and Gynecology and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, from January 2010 to April 2020 were collected and analyzed. Main outcome measures: Comparison of the racial and ethnic composition of the U.S. RCTs to U.S. General population. Results: Chi-square analysis showed significant deviations from the U.S. general population in both Obstetrics (p<0.001) and Gynecology (p<0.05). We observed an overrepresentation of Black race and an underrepresentation of White and Asian races overall Obstetrics and in most subcategories. We observed an overrepresentation of Black race and an underrepresentation of Asian race in Gynecology overall and in most subcategories. White race representation was similar to the general population on average, but with wide variation across studies especially among the subcategories. Hispanic ethnicity was overall underrepresented. Conclusions: RCTs in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology conducted in the U.S. deviate from the general population with regard to racial and ethnic distributions. Funding: NC,YW, CP, JG and SL received stipend from University of Chicago Metcalf summer internship program and Odyssey and Empower summer program. Keywords: U.S. Randomized Controlled Trials, Racial and Ethnic Backgrounds, Obstetrics and Gynecology
Title: Racial and Ethnic Backgrounds of U.S. Randomized Controlled Trials in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comparison to U.S. General Population: A Retrospective Review
Description:
Objective: To determine if the racial and ethnic compositions of the participants in Obstetrics and Gynecology randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in the U.
S.
match that of the general U.
S.
population.
Design: Retrospective analysis of U.
S.
RCTs.
Setting: United States.
Population: Women enrolled in U.
S.
RCTs.
Methods: Racial and ethnic composition of RCT participants published in two premier US journals, Obstetrics and Gynecology and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, from January 2010 to April 2020 were collected and analyzed.
Main outcome measures: Comparison of the racial and ethnic composition of the U.
S.
RCTs to U.
S.
General population.
Results: Chi-square analysis showed significant deviations from the U.
S.
general population in both Obstetrics (p<0.
001) and Gynecology (p<0.
05).
We observed an overrepresentation of Black race and an underrepresentation of White and Asian races overall Obstetrics and in most subcategories.
We observed an overrepresentation of Black race and an underrepresentation of Asian race in Gynecology overall and in most subcategories.
White race representation was similar to the general population on average, but with wide variation across studies especially among the subcategories.
Hispanic ethnicity was overall underrepresented.
Conclusions: RCTs in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology conducted in the U.
S.
deviate from the general population with regard to racial and ethnic distributions.
Funding: NC,YW, CP, JG and SL received stipend from University of Chicago Metcalf summer internship program and Odyssey and Empower summer program.
Keywords: U.
S.
Randomized Controlled Trials, Racial and Ethnic Backgrounds, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Awareness of Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology Among Residents and Residency Directors
Awareness of Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology Among Residents and Residency Directors
Awareness of the subspecialty of infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology is low among United States residents and residency directors. Objective. Given the burden of infe...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Evaluation of Infectious Disease Knowledge in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Effects of Varying Durations of Training
Evaluation of Infectious Disease Knowledge in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Effects of Varying Durations of Training
Objective: The amount, origin, and resources of infectious disease knowledge in the field ofobstetrics and gynecology were investigated. If this knowledge is ...

Back to Top