Decoding Visual Spatial Attention Control

Abstract In models of visual spatial attention control, it is commonly held that top-down control signals originate in the dorsal attention network, propagating to the visual cortex to modulate baseline neural activity and bias sensory processing. However, the precise distribution of these top-down influences across different levels of the visual hierarchy is debated. In addition, it is unclear whether these changes in baseline neural activity directly translate into improved performance. We analyzed attention-related baseline activity during the anticipatory period of a trial-by-trial voluntary spatial attention task, using two independent fMRI datasets, and two different analytic approaches. First, as in prior studies, univariate analysis showed that covert attention significantly enhanced baseline neural activity in higher-order visual areas contralateral to the attended visual hemifield, while effects in lower-order visual areas (e.g., V1) were weaker and more variable. Second, in contrast, multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) revealed significant decoding of attention conditions across all visual cortical areas, with lower-order visual areas exhibiting higher decoding accuracies than higher-order areas. Third, decoding accuracy, rather than the magnitude of univariate activation, was a better predictor of a subject’s stimulus discrimination performance. Finally, the MVPA results were replicated across two experimental conditions, where the direction of spatial attention was either externally instructed by a cue or based on the participants free choice decision about where to attend. Together, these findings offer new insights into the extent of attentional biases in the visual hierarchy under top-down control, and how these biases influence both sensory processing and behavioral performance. Highlights Multivariate pattern analysis revealed the presence of top-down attentional biasing signals in all areas of the visual hierarchy whereas univariate analysis was not able to reveal the full extent of attentional biasing in the visual cortex. The decoding accuracy derived from the MVPA analysis but not the magnitude difference derived from the univariate analysis predicted the subject’s behavioral performance in stimulus discrimination. The MVPA results were consistent across two experimental conditions where the direction of spatial attention was driven either by external instructions or from purely internal decisions.