Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Generative artificial intelligence as a means of delivering personalised and adaptive feedback in education

View through CrossRef
Introduction. In today’s digital transformation era, enhancing the quality of the learning process through improved feedback mechanisms has become particularly relevant. Traditional feedback methods are unable to adapt dynamically to the unique educational needs of any learner. Generative artificial intelligence (hereinafter GAI) is an innovative tool that expands the teacher’s capabilities in automating and personalising learner feedback. The aim of this article is to develop the theoretical foundations and practical applications of GAI in the organisation of feedback to ensure a personalised, timely, and informed dialogue between the teacher and the learner. Methodology and methods. The survey involved 15 lecturers and 213 students working on teacher training programmes at the Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Studies of Pushkin Leningrad State University (St Petersburg). The participants were divided into two groups: the control group (107 students), where traditional feedback was used, and the experimental group (106 students) involving an improved GAI-based feedback system. An experiment was conducted to assess the impact of different feedback methods on student satisfaction with the feedback. Systemic, person-centred and praxiological approaches were used to analyse the effects. The experiment results were assessed on the basis of questionnaires and statistical methods (Mann Whitney and Wilcoxon tests). KEYWORDS Results. The findings of the experiment showed a statistically significant improvement in the perception of feedback by the experimental group working with GAI, compared to the control group, where traditional methods were applied (p< 0.01). The key indicators, characterising the timeliness, personalisation level and informative value of feedback, demonstrated steady growth (determination coefficients R² ≥ 0.97), which directly resulted in an increase in students’ overall satisfaction. The use of GAI significantly reduced the routine workload of teachers (by approximately 80–87% according to their estimates) and improved the speed and quality of feedback (with up to 93% of positive ratings). The students noted their increased motivation, reduced anxiety and greater confidence in the learning process. It was concluded, on the basis of the quantitative and qualitative indicators of the experiment, that the integration of GAI into the feedback system facilitated a more personalised and adaptive dialogue between the teacher and the student. Conclusion. The integration of GAI into the feedback system represents an innovative solution for optimising teaching practice and improving the quality of education. The balanced interaction of the teacher and GAI ensures a high degree of personalisation in feedback, helps to increase learners’ motivation and engagement, and stimulates the development of students’ critical thinking and interest in the learning process. The presented results can be used to develop professional development programmes for teachers in applying GAI in the educational process.
Title: Generative artificial intelligence as a means of delivering personalised and adaptive feedback in education
Description:
Introduction.
In today’s digital transformation era, enhancing the quality of the learning process through improved feedback mechanisms has become particularly relevant.
Traditional feedback methods are unable to adapt dynamically to the unique educational needs of any learner.
Generative artificial intelligence (hereinafter GAI) is an innovative tool that expands the teacher’s capabilities in automating and personalising learner feedback.
The aim of this article is to develop the theoretical foundations and practical applications of GAI in the organisation of feedback to ensure a personalised, timely, and informed dialogue between the teacher and the learner.
Methodology and methods.
The survey involved 15 lecturers and 213 students working on teacher training programmes at the Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Studies of Pushkin Leningrad State University (St Petersburg).
The participants were divided into two groups: the control group (107 students), where traditional feedback was used, and the experimental group (106 students) involving an improved GAI-based feedback system.
An experiment was conducted to assess the impact of different feedback methods on student satisfaction with the feedback.
Systemic, person-centred and praxiological approaches were used to analyse the effects.
The experiment results were assessed on the basis of questionnaires and statistical methods (Mann Whitney and Wilcoxon tests).
KEYWORDS Results.
The findings of the experiment showed a statistically significant improvement in the perception of feedback by the experimental group working with GAI, compared to the control group, where traditional methods were applied (p< 0.
01).
The key indicators, characterising the timeliness, personalisation level and informative value of feedback, demonstrated steady growth (determination coefficients R² ≥ 0.
97), which directly resulted in an increase in students’ overall satisfaction.
The use of GAI significantly reduced the routine workload of teachers (by approximately 80–87% according to their estimates) and improved the speed and quality of feedback (with up to 93% of positive ratings).
The students noted their increased motivation, reduced anxiety and greater confidence in the learning process.
It was concluded, on the basis of the quantitative and qualitative indicators of the experiment, that the integration of GAI into the feedback system facilitated a more personalised and adaptive dialogue between the teacher and the student.
Conclusion.
The integration of GAI into the feedback system represents an innovative solution for optimising teaching practice and improving the quality of education.
The balanced interaction of the teacher and GAI ensures a high degree of personalisation in feedback, helps to increase learners’ motivation and engagement, and stimulates the development of students’ critical thinking and interest in the learning process.
The presented results can be used to develop professional development programmes for teachers in applying GAI in the educational process.

Related Results

AI-infused patients for enhanced clinical simulation
AI-infused patients for enhanced clinical simulation
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence in computers, allowing them to perform tasks that usually require human cognitive abilities, such as dec...
The Artificial
The Artificial
Orvell noted that despite the evolution of society, imitation and authenticity function as “compass points” that guide meaning-making and retain potency as humans continue to negot...
An epistemic justice account of students’ experiences of feedback
An epistemic justice account of students’ experiences of feedback
I am a storyteller. I believe in the power of stories to share experiences and to elucidate thoughts and ideas and to help us to make sense of complex social practices. This thesis...
Potential of Artificial Intelligence Tools for Text Evaluation and Feedback Provision
Potential of Artificial Intelligence Tools for Text Evaluation and Feedback Provision
The article aims to explore the potential of generative artificial intelligence (AI) for assessing written work and providing feedback on it. The goal of this research is to determ...
Designing rich feedback encounters
Designing rich feedback encounters
Feedback is a cornerstone of effective learning, yet it remains one of the most persistently complex challenges in higher education, for educators and students alike. This workshop...
Personalized Learning in Higher Education for Health Sciences: A Scoping Review Protocol
Personalized Learning in Higher Education for Health Sciences: A Scoping Review Protocol
Abstract Background Personalised learning, an educational approach that tailors teaching and learning to individual needs and preferences, has gained attention in recent y...
Post-Pandemic Support for Special Populations in Higher Education through Generative Artificial Intelligence
Post-Pandemic Support for Special Populations in Higher Education through Generative Artificial Intelligence
The sudden closure of schools in response to the COVID-19 pandemic prompted education authorities to quickly explore new teaching and learning methods. This disruption to tradition...
La luz: de herramienta a lenguaje. Una nueva metodología de iluminación artificial en el proyecto arquitectónico.
La luz: de herramienta a lenguaje. Una nueva metodología de iluminación artificial en el proyecto arquitectónico.
The constant development of artificial lighting throughout the twentieth century helped to develop architecture to the current situation in which a new methodology is needed for ...

Back to Top