Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Decision-Making in High-Stakes Environments
View through CrossRef
This study investigates the impact of cognitive biases—specifically confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and availability bias—on decision-making in high-stakes environments such as healthcare, finance, and emergency services. The research employs a quantitative design, examining how these biases affect decision accuracy and decision time. Through a combination of scenario-based tasks, surveys, and case study analyses, the study explores how frequently professionals in these sectors experience these biases, their awareness of them, and the impact on their decisions. Results indicate that availability bias was the most commonly reported bias, followed by confirmation bias and anchoring bias, with decision accuracy significantly decreasing as these biases were introduced. Additionally, decision-making time increased under biased conditions, particularly in healthcare and emergency services. The study further highlights the negative correlation between the frequency of cognitive biases and decision accuracy, underscoring the importance of developing strategies to mitigate these biases in high-pressure settings. The findings suggest that structured decision-making frameworks and training programs can help professionals make more objective decisions and improve overall decision quality in critical environments.
Ali Institute of Research & Skills Development
Title: The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Decision-Making in High-Stakes Environments
Description:
This study investigates the impact of cognitive biases—specifically confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and availability bias—on decision-making in high-stakes environments such as healthcare, finance, and emergency services.
The research employs a quantitative design, examining how these biases affect decision accuracy and decision time.
Through a combination of scenario-based tasks, surveys, and case study analyses, the study explores how frequently professionals in these sectors experience these biases, their awareness of them, and the impact on their decisions.
Results indicate that availability bias was the most commonly reported bias, followed by confirmation bias and anchoring bias, with decision accuracy significantly decreasing as these biases were introduced.
Additionally, decision-making time increased under biased conditions, particularly in healthcare and emergency services.
The study further highlights the negative correlation between the frequency of cognitive biases and decision accuracy, underscoring the importance of developing strategies to mitigate these biases in high-pressure settings.
The findings suggest that structured decision-making frameworks and training programs can help professionals make more objective decisions and improve overall decision quality in critical environments.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Analyze how cognitive biases influence corporate financial decisions, such as mergers, acquisitions, and investments
Analyze how cognitive biases influence corporate financial decisions, such as mergers, acquisitions, and investments
Cognitive biases play a crucial role in shaping corporate financial decisions, particularly in the high-stakes arenas of mergers, acquisitions, and investments. This paper investig...
Association of Cognitive Biases with Gender Role Stereotyping
Association of Cognitive Biases with Gender Role Stereotyping
Stereotypes are created through certain cognitive processes. These decision making and meaning making processes involve heuristics that lead to cognitive biases. The present study ...
Emotional Paternalism
Emotional Paternalism
The literature on heuristics and biases in decision-making, as well as on emotional influences on judgments, is burgeoning. Commentators reviewing such work have begun to discuss ...
Diagnosing Investment Decision Failures: A Forensic Behavioral Framework of Prospect-Related Biases, Cognitive Dissonance and Investment Decision Quality (IDQ)
Diagnosing Investment Decision Failures: A Forensic Behavioral Framework of Prospect-Related Biases, Cognitive Dissonance and Investment Decision Quality (IDQ)
Investment decision failures are products of complex behavioural processes, and not cognitive errors in isolation. This paper builds upon Prospect Theory and Cognitive Dissonance T...
Cognitive bias: how understanding its impact on antibiotic prescribing decisions can help advance antimicrobial stewardship
Cognitive bias: how understanding its impact on antibiotic prescribing decisions can help advance antimicrobial stewardship
Abstract
The way clinicians think about decision-making is evolving. Human decision-making shifts between two modes of thinking, either fast/intuitive (Type 1) or sl...
Intrinsic biases are under (meta)cognitive control
Intrinsic biases are under (meta)cognitive control
Individuals often exhibit decision biases when making forced-choice decisions, but are such biases under cognitive control? In this pre-registered study, we asked whether decision ...
Intrinsic biases are under (meta)cognitive control
Intrinsic biases are under (meta)cognitive control
Individuals often exhibit decision biases when making forced-choice decisions, but are such biases under cognitive control? In this pre-registered study, we asked whether decision ...

