Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The hydrostatical works of George Sinclair ( c .1630–1696): their neglect and criticism
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The Scottish natural philosopher George Sinclair (or Sinclar) (c.1630–1696) was one of the earliest British writers on hydrostatics. He visited London in 1662, when he met Sir Robert Moray and Robert Boyle and left a manuscript treatise at the Royal Society. Receipt of this work was never recorded by the Society, and Sinclair felt that he had been dealt with unfairly. A Latin version, Ars nova et magna gravitatis et levitatis, was published in 1669, followed by his Hydrostaticks in 1672. All Sinclair's works were vituperatively and pseudonymously criticized by James Gregory and William Sanders in The Great and New Art of Weighing Vanity of 1672. Here, Sinclair's life is summarized, and his disputes with the Royal Society and with Gregory and Sanders are examined. It is argued that, despite his other limitations, Sinclair's knowledge of hydrostatics was considerable, and that the criticisms made against him were exaggerated. Yet his work was subsequently neglected. Sinclair's treatment sheds light both on academic rivalries and on the procedures of the early Royal Society.
Title: The hydrostatical works of George Sinclair (
c
.1630–1696): their neglect and criticism
Description:
Abstract
The Scottish natural philosopher George Sinclair (or Sinclar) (c.
1630–1696) was one of the earliest British writers on hydrostatics.
He visited London in 1662, when he met Sir Robert Moray and Robert Boyle and left a manuscript treatise at the Royal Society.
Receipt of this work was never recorded by the Society, and Sinclair felt that he had been dealt with unfairly.
A Latin version, Ars nova et magna gravitatis et levitatis, was published in 1669, followed by his Hydrostaticks in 1672.
All Sinclair's works were vituperatively and pseudonymously criticized by James Gregory and William Sanders in The Great and New Art of Weighing Vanity of 1672.
Here, Sinclair's life is summarized, and his disputes with the Royal Society and with Gregory and Sanders are examined.
It is argued that, despite his other limitations, Sinclair's knowledge of hydrostatics was considerable, and that the criticisms made against him were exaggerated.
Yet his work was subsequently neglected.
Sinclair's treatment sheds light both on academic rivalries and on the procedures of the early Royal Society.
Related Results
The hydrostatical works of George Sinclair (
c
. 1630–1696): an addendum
The hydrostatical works of George Sinclair (
c
. 1630–1696): an addendum
Further to a recent paper about the work of George Sinclair (
c
. 1630–1696), new biographical information has come to light. Following one ...
Measuring Proximity: A Post-Interpretive Diagnostic Experiment in Art Criticism A Diagnostic Lens on Ethical Witnessing in Art Criticism
Measuring Proximity: A Post-Interpretive Diagnostic Experiment in Art Criticism A Diagnostic Lens on Ethical Witnessing in Art Criticism
Contemporary art criticism often advances by way of interpretive extraction. Works are translated into meanings, themes, intentions, and arguments, which then circulate with remark...
A Philosophical Departure from Post-Criticism
A Philosophical Departure from Post-Criticism
A Philosophical Departure from Post-Criticism
By Dorian Vale
— A Treatise in the Post-Interpretive Movement
A Philosophical Departure from Post-Criticism is a pivotal treatise th...
Extending Post-Interpretive Criticism: Additional Diagnostic Indices for Enhanced Phenomenological Fidelity in Art Criticism
Extending Post-Interpretive Criticism: Additional Diagnostic Indices for Enhanced Phenomenological Fidelity in Art Criticism
This paper extends Post-Interpretive Criticism (PIC) by introducing a second layer of diagnostic indices designed to evaluate the phenomenological fidelity of art criticism. While ...
Grammer of Grief
Grammer of Grief
This essay investigates the relationship between mourning and linguistic structure, proposing that grief produces not merely emotional disruption but a reconfiguration of grammar i...
Formal Defence of Post-Interpretive Criticism
Formal Defence of Post-Interpretive Criticism
Formal Defence of Post-Interpretive Criticism
By Dorian Vale
Philosopher of Aesthetics & Founder of the Post-Interpretive Movement
This treatise offers the first formal philo...
Effects of Prism Adaptation on Reference Systems for Extrapersonal Space in Neglect Patients
Effects of Prism Adaptation on Reference Systems for Extrapersonal Space in Neglect Patients
Up to now, rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect has focused on egocentric forms of neglect, whereas less is known about the possibility to improve allocentric deficits. The...
Child Neglect: Statutes, Rates, and a Neglect Diversion Model
Child Neglect: Statutes, Rates, and a Neglect Diversion Model
Introduction: Poverty is a correlate if not a cause of child neglect in the US and worldwide (Slack, 2017; WHO & UNICEF,2021,UN 2021). Definitions of child neglect vary widely ...

