Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An exploratory study of a hands‐on naloxone training for rural clinicians and staff

View through CrossRef
AbstractIntroductionSince the COVID‐19 pandemic, an increase in fentanyl‐combined drugs has led to a surge in opioid overdose deaths in the United States. Higher opioid overdose mortality rates are problematic in rural communities, and there are few prevention, treatment, and recovery resources for individuals experiencing opioid use disorder.MethodThis exploratory project aimed to investigate a hands‐on naloxone training for rural clinicians and staff. Rural clinicians and staff at two behavioral health centers were recruited to participate in a 30‐min lecture and 30‐min hands‐on intranasal naloxone training using a low‐fidelity mannequin. A pre‐post opioid knowledge questionnaire, rubric based on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration toolkit, and investigator‐generated survey were used to evaluate opioid knowledge and response, demonstration of intranasal naloxone administration, and participants' perceptions of the training. Enrollment characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics and paired t‐tests were used to assess mean differences.ResultsOf the nine participants in the project, seven (87.5%) were female and six (75.0%) were Black. Four participants assumed a therapist role, attained a MS or MA degree, and had 5 or more years of experience working in healthcare. The total mean rubric score for all participants was 96.0 (SD = 8.8). No significant pre‐post mean differences among opioid knowledge, overdose risk, and overdose response categories were found, all p > 0.05. However, post‐intervention mean scores were slightly higher in all categories except overdose risk. Most participants (77.8%) responded that they felt comfortable handling an opioid situation and teaching the training to community members. Open‐ended responses indicated that participants liked the demonstrations, examples used, hands‐on nature of the training, and the presentation materials.ConclusionA hands‐on naloxone training is beneficial for training rural clinicians and staff to respond to opioid overdose. This training may be a promising solution to reduce response time between recognition of opioid symptoms and administration of the life‐saving medication, naloxone. Future studies should examine the efficacy of this training in larger samples with the inclusion of rural interdisciplinary teams, trusted community leaders, and family and friends of those impacted by opioid use disorder.Clinical relevanceThis innovative hands‐on naloxone training is designed for rural clinicians and residents who are most likely to witness individuals experiencing opioid toxicity. The primary goal is to reduce response time between recognition of signs and symptoms and administration of the life‐saving medication, Naloxone.
Title: An exploratory study of a hands‐on naloxone training for rural clinicians and staff
Description:
AbstractIntroductionSince the COVID‐19 pandemic, an increase in fentanyl‐combined drugs has led to a surge in opioid overdose deaths in the United States.
Higher opioid overdose mortality rates are problematic in rural communities, and there are few prevention, treatment, and recovery resources for individuals experiencing opioid use disorder.
MethodThis exploratory project aimed to investigate a hands‐on naloxone training for rural clinicians and staff.
Rural clinicians and staff at two behavioral health centers were recruited to participate in a 30‐min lecture and 30‐min hands‐on intranasal naloxone training using a low‐fidelity mannequin.
A pre‐post opioid knowledge questionnaire, rubric based on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration toolkit, and investigator‐generated survey were used to evaluate opioid knowledge and response, demonstration of intranasal naloxone administration, and participants' perceptions of the training.
Enrollment characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics and paired t‐tests were used to assess mean differences.
ResultsOf the nine participants in the project, seven (87.
5%) were female and six (75.
0%) were Black.
Four participants assumed a therapist role, attained a MS or MA degree, and had 5 or more years of experience working in healthcare.
The total mean rubric score for all participants was 96.
0 (SD = 8.
8).
No significant pre‐post mean differences among opioid knowledge, overdose risk, and overdose response categories were found, all p > 0.
05.
However, post‐intervention mean scores were slightly higher in all categories except overdose risk.
Most participants (77.
8%) responded that they felt comfortable handling an opioid situation and teaching the training to community members.
Open‐ended responses indicated that participants liked the demonstrations, examples used, hands‐on nature of the training, and the presentation materials.
ConclusionA hands‐on naloxone training is beneficial for training rural clinicians and staff to respond to opioid overdose.
This training may be a promising solution to reduce response time between recognition of opioid symptoms and administration of the life‐saving medication, naloxone.
Future studies should examine the efficacy of this training in larger samples with the inclusion of rural interdisciplinary teams, trusted community leaders, and family and friends of those impacted by opioid use disorder.
Clinical relevanceThis innovative hands‐on naloxone training is designed for rural clinicians and residents who are most likely to witness individuals experiencing opioid toxicity.
The primary goal is to reduce response time between recognition of signs and symptoms and administration of the life‐saving medication, Naloxone.

Related Results

Naloxone Use for Opioid Reversal in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease
Naloxone Use for Opioid Reversal in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease
Abstract Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are known to require increased dosing of drugs including opioids due to differences in renal and hepatic metabolism....
Naloxone Knowledge, Carrying, Purchase, and Use
Naloxone Knowledge, Carrying, Purchase, and Use
ImportanceWidespread naloxone access is a key policy response to the opioid crisis. Naloxone availability is typically estimated from pharmacy sales, which exclude naloxone provide...
Naloxone Improves Splanchnic Perfusion in Conscious Dogs through Effects on the Central Nervous System
Naloxone Improves Splanchnic Perfusion in Conscious Dogs through Effects on the Central Nervous System
Background In patients undergoing colonoscopy, naloxone has vasodilative properties. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is mediated by central or p...
Pharmacists’ naloxone offering and dispensing practices
Pharmacists’ naloxone offering and dispensing practices
Objective: The primary objective of this paper is to understand pharmacists’ naloxone offering and dispensing practices and factors affecting those practices. The secondary objecti...
Analgesic efficacy of intravenous naloxone for the treatment of postoperative pruritus: A meta-analysis
Analgesic efficacy of intravenous naloxone for the treatment of postoperative pruritus: A meta-analysis
Objectives: Pruritus may be a significant problem for patients in the postoperative period. There are many options for the treatment of pruritus including intravenous (IV) naloxone...
Improving harm reduction with a naloxone intervention in primary care to prescribe and educate a support person
Improving harm reduction with a naloxone intervention in primary care to prescribe and educate a support person
Objective: To determine whether a pharmacist-led intervention would increase the number of naloxone prescriptions and naloxone administration education in a primary care family med...
Comparing the safety and efficacy of intravenous naloxone administration in opioid-naive and opioid-tolerant hospitalized oncology patients
Comparing the safety and efficacy of intravenous naloxone administration in opioid-naive and opioid-tolerant hospitalized oncology patients
Objective: To compare naloxone doses and clinical outcomes after emergency opioid reversal in opioid-naïve and opioid-tolerant inpatients.Design: Cross-sectional, retrospective cha...

Back to Top