Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A systematic review and meta-analysis of candesartan and losartan in the management of essential hypertension
View through CrossRef
Background: Candesartan is a relatively novel antihypertensive agent of the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Several clinical trials have compared candesartan with losartan in the management of essential hypertension. However, systematic assessment of efficacy and safety between candesartan and losartan is still lacking.Methods: We reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing candesartan with losartan for net reduction in blood pressure from baseline, response and control rates, and incidences of common and serious adverse events.Weighted mean differences (WMD), and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous data, respectively.Results: A total of 12 RCTs with 3644 patients were included in this meta-analysis. When comparing the efficacy of candesartan and losartan in reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at the end of the follow-up period, results with candesartan were superior to losartan in the reduction SBP and DBP (WMD, -2.97; 95% CI, -4.18 — -1.77; p < 0.001; WMD, -1.76; 95% CI, -2.57 — -0.96; p < 0.001; respectively). Candesartan had better response and control rates than losartan. (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06—1.18; p < 0.01; RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06—1.50; p = 0.008). Reported common adverse events for the two agents were not significantly different (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.86—1.12; p = 0.78). The incidence of serious adverse events for candesartan was lower than for losartan (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25—0.92; p = 0.03). The net reduction of DBP showed negative correlation with baseline DBP in both candesartan and losartan groups (regression coefficient -1.81, p = 0.03 and regression coefficient -1.56, p = 0.02, respectively).Conclusions: Candesartan is superior to losartan in reducing blood pressure. Candesartan also causes fewer serious adverse events than losartan.
Title: A systematic review and meta-analysis of candesartan and losartan in the management of essential hypertension
Description:
Background: Candesartan is a relatively novel antihypertensive agent of the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB).
Several clinical trials have compared candesartan with losartan in the management of essential hypertension.
However, systematic assessment of efficacy and safety between candesartan and losartan is still lacking.
Methods: We reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing candesartan with losartan for net reduction in blood pressure from baseline, response and control rates, and incidences of common and serious adverse events.
Weighted mean differences (WMD), and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous data, respectively.
Results: A total of 12 RCTs with 3644 patients were included in this meta-analysis.
When comparing the efficacy of candesartan and losartan in reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at the end of the follow-up period, results with candesartan were superior to losartan in the reduction SBP and DBP (WMD, -2.
97; 95% CI, -4.
18 — -1.
77; p < 0.
001; WMD, -1.
76; 95% CI, -2.
57 — -0.
96; p < 0.
001; respectively).
Candesartan had better response and control rates than losartan.
(RR, 1.
12; 95% CI, 1.
06—1.
18; p < 0.
01; RR, 1.
26; 95% CI, 1.
06—1.
50; p = 0.
008).
Reported common adverse events for the two agents were not significantly different (RR, 0.
98; 95% CI, 0.
86—1.
12; p = 0.
78).
The incidence of serious adverse events for candesartan was lower than for losartan (RR, 0.
48; 95% CI, 0.
25—0.
92; p = 0.
03).
The net reduction of DBP showed negative correlation with baseline DBP in both candesartan and losartan groups (regression coefficient -1.
81, p = 0.
03 and regression coefficient -1.
56, p = 0.
02, respectively).
Conclusions: Candesartan is superior to losartan in reducing blood pressure.
Candesartan also causes fewer serious adverse events than losartan.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
A Comparative Change in Left Ventricular Mass Index on Echocardiography in Hypertensive Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients Taking Candesartan
A Comparative Change in Left Ventricular Mass Index on Echocardiography in Hypertensive Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients Taking Candesartan
Background: To assess the evolution of the left ventricular mass index on echocardiography in candesartan-treated hypertension individuals with and without diabetes. Study Design: ...
Pharmacogenomics and the Concept of Personalized Medicine for the Management of Hypertension
Pharmacogenomics and the Concept of Personalized Medicine for the Management of Hypertension
Hypertension poses a significant global burden due to low adherence to antihypertensive medications. Hypertension treatment aims to bring blood pressure within physiological ranges...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
The Role of the Clinical Pharmacist in A Case of Losartan-Induced Faintness and Dysarthria
The Role of the Clinical Pharmacist in A Case of Losartan-Induced Faintness and Dysarthria
Background: A common first-line antihypertensive the medication losartan has excellent absorption after being taken orally and undergoes extensive first-pass metabolic processes. L...
The Role of Candesartan in Heart Failure Management: A Literature Review
The Role of Candesartan in Heart Failure Management: A Literature Review
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent cardiovascular condition with increasing prevalence due to an aging population and higher rates of comorbidities. Candesartan, an angi...
The therapy of microalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension
The therapy of microalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension
Objective
To delineate the speculation that triple combination of small doses of calcium antagonist (levoamlodipine), ACEI (imidapril) and ARB (candesartan) may e...
STRATEGIES FOR THE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF HYPERTENSION IN RURAL COMMUNITIES
STRATEGIES FOR THE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF HYPERTENSION IN RURAL COMMUNITIES
Hypertension is a prevalent chronic condition that can lead to serious complications such as cardiovascular disease, stroke and kidney failure. The prevalence of hypertension is es...

