Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Marx’s Concept of Socialism
View through CrossRef
Abstract
One of the most important theoretical challenges facing us is developing a viable alternative to capitalism. Achieving this requires rethinking basic premises of social theory and practice, given the difficulties of freeing humanity from such problems as alienation, class domination, and the capitalist law of value. Taking off from Marx’s Concept of the Alternative to Capitalism, this article explores how Marx’s critique of capital, value production, and abstract universal labor time is grounded in an emancipatory vision of a post-capitalist society—a vision that has been largely overlooked. While Marx never wrote “blueprints of the future,” the full breadth of his work as revealed in the Marx-Engels Gesaumtausgabe indicates that his vision of a post-capitalist society went further than specifying the need to abolish private property and “anarchic” exchange relations. This chapter seeks to show how Marx’s writings on this issue provide important theoretical ground for envisioning a non-capitalist future in the twenty-first century.
Title: Marx’s Concept of Socialism
Description:
Abstract
One of the most important theoretical challenges facing us is developing a viable alternative to capitalism.
Achieving this requires rethinking basic premises of social theory and practice, given the difficulties of freeing humanity from such problems as alienation, class domination, and the capitalist law of value.
Taking off from Marx’s Concept of the Alternative to Capitalism, this article explores how Marx’s critique of capital, value production, and abstract universal labor time is grounded in an emancipatory vision of a post-capitalist society—a vision that has been largely overlooked.
While Marx never wrote “blueprints of the future,” the full breadth of his work as revealed in the Marx-Engels Gesaumtausgabe indicates that his vision of a post-capitalist society went further than specifying the need to abolish private property and “anarchic” exchange relations.
This chapter seeks to show how Marx’s writings on this issue provide important theoretical ground for envisioning a non-capitalist future in the twenty-first century.
Related Results
Socialism and Its Critics
Socialism and Its Critics
This chapter discusses criticisms of socialism and how it can respond. The ways socialism can respond to criticisms are categorized into several types. The chapter outlines communi...
Interview with David McLellan July 2018
Interview with David McLellan July 2018
David McLellan, interviewed here, is a Fellow of Goldsmiths College, University of London and Emeritus Professor of Political Theory, University of Kent. Since the 1970s he has bee...
The Sociology of Socialism: A Review and Prospectus
The Sociology of Socialism: A Review and Prospectus
Is socialism still relevant for sociology? Sociology and socialism are entwined logically and historically. But today, American sociology seems mostly silent about socialism. This ...
A STUDY OF IDEOLOGICAL SHIFTS OF PAKISTAN PEOPLE'S PARTY FROM SOCIALISM TO PRAGMATISM (1967-2024)
A STUDY OF IDEOLOGICAL SHIFTS OF PAKISTAN PEOPLE'S PARTY FROM SOCIALISM TO PRAGMATISM (1967-2024)
The political parties are not just a group of people but they have a clear organization structure, ideas, beliefs & interests which make a party individual from existing once. ...
FROM POLITICS TO THEORY: THE EARLY PUBLIC RECEPTION OF MARX IN BRITAIN, 1885–1887
FROM POLITICS TO THEORY: THE EARLY PUBLIC RECEPTION OF MARX IN BRITAIN, 1885–1887
The visibility of Karl Marx in England had a ’major breakthrough’ accordingto Willis (1977): the publication of the first volume of ’Das Kapital’ in English in1887. Although Willis...
¿Por qué leer a Marx hoy?
¿Por qué leer a Marx hoy?
¿Y por qué no habría de leerlo? En el caso particular de Marx, ha habido a lo largo del tiempo, y hay aún, tanto discurso anti-Marx y también antimarxista que, entre todos los auto...
Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx
Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx
Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx: On Totalitarianism and the Tradition of Western Political Thought is the first book to examine Hannah Arendt’s unpublished writings on Marx in their to...
Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007.
Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007.
AbstractAndrew Kliman’s Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’ sets out to refute the ‘myth’ that Marx’s original presentation of the theory of the value is internally inconsistent. A century...

