Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Stephanus’ Sources: the Tradition of ἐθνικά
View through CrossRef
This chapter focuses on some problems associated with Stephanus' ultimate sources, and considers how much his text contributes to the subject of ethnic terminology. Stephanus is not the earliest writer on or compiler of a catalogue of places and ethnics, but his work alone survives, though only in an epitomised form, and is thus the essential part of the evidence. The goal is to interrogate the text in the hope that it will throw more light on the various aspects of ethnic formations in general use. The chapter examines the text of the Epitome with especial reference to the main sources of earlier date, with particular consideration to (a) Alexander Polyhistor, of Miletus, a contemporary of Sulla, to whom he owed his Roman citizenship, with the nomen Cornelius, whose enormous output — some thirty separate titles in all — included numerous works concerned with ethnic forms; (b) Herennius Philon of Byblos, the Phoenician‐Greek ‘translator’ or author of the Phoenician history which passed under the name of Sanchuniathon, and author of a work on ‘Famous Cities and their Famous Sons’, which included much information on ethnic forms; and (c) Alexandrian Oros, of the fourth/fifth century ad, who formed perhaps the final link between Stephanus and his predecessors, and also between Stephanus and contemporary or later writers.
Title: Stephanus’ Sources: the Tradition of ἐθνικά
Description:
This chapter focuses on some problems associated with Stephanus' ultimate sources, and considers how much his text contributes to the subject of ethnic terminology.
Stephanus is not the earliest writer on or compiler of a catalogue of places and ethnics, but his work alone survives, though only in an epitomised form, and is thus the essential part of the evidence.
The goal is to interrogate the text in the hope that it will throw more light on the various aspects of ethnic formations in general use.
The chapter examines the text of the Epitome with especial reference to the main sources of earlier date, with particular consideration to (a) Alexander Polyhistor, of Miletus, a contemporary of Sulla, to whom he owed his Roman citizenship, with the nomen Cornelius, whose enormous output — some thirty separate titles in all — included numerous works concerned with ethnic forms; (b) Herennius Philon of Byblos, the Phoenician‐Greek ‘translator’ or author of the Phoenician history which passed under the name of Sanchuniathon, and author of a work on ‘Famous Cities and their Famous Sons’, which included much information on ethnic forms; and (c) Alexandrian Oros, of the fourth/fifth century ad, who formed perhaps the final link between Stephanus and his predecessors, and also between Stephanus and contemporary or later writers.
Related Results
Lycian Ἐρευάτης in Stephanus of Byzantium
Lycian Ἐρευάτης in Stephanus of Byzantium
Abstract
This paper deals with the Lycian toponym Ἐρευάτης, attested in the epitome of the Ethnica by Stephanus of Byzantium, from a linguistic point of view. Fir...
After Stephanus
After Stephanus
The epitomised Stephanus is the only text of an Ethnika surviving from antiquity. Consequently we cannot speak of his successors in the same way that he himself may be regarded as ...
Stephanus of Byzantium’s Vocabulary
Stephanus of Byzantium’s Vocabulary
The text of the Epitome of Stephanus contains no preliminary statement of principle regarding grammatical rules for individual ethnics, and although reference may be made under ind...
Phylogeny and evolutionary analysis of the whole mitochondrial genome of Neohirasea stephanus Redtenbacher, 1908 (Phasmatodea, Loncodidae)
Phylogeny and evolutionary analysis of the whole mitochondrial genome of Neohirasea stephanus Redtenbacher, 1908 (Phasmatodea, Loncodidae)
Neohirasea stephanus belongs to the subfamily Necrosciinae in phasmida, which is the most abundant subfamily. In this study, the mitochondrial genome of Neohirasea&nbs...
PERUBAHAN TRADISI KAMOMOOSE DI KECAMATAN LAKUDO KABUPATEN BUTON TENGAH: 1940-2017
PERUBAHAN TRADISI KAMOMOOSE DI KECAMATAN LAKUDO KABUPATEN BUTON TENGAH: 1940-2017
This study aims to describe: (1) the background of the birth of Kamomoose in Lakudo District, Central Buton Regency (2) the change in the Kamomoose tradition in Lakudo District of ...
Tradisi Omed-omedan dalam Perspektif Industri Budaya
Tradisi Omed-omedan dalam Perspektif Industri Budaya
The Omed-omedan tradition is one of the unique traditions in the city of Denpasar, precisely in Banjar Kaja, Kelurahan Sesetan. The Omed-omedan tradition is a mythology accepted as...
Confucian Tradition, Modernization, and Globalization
Confucian Tradition, Modernization, and Globalization
Drawing on important theories on tradition and modernization that developed in the past few decades, this article is intended to argue against two extreme views concerning traditio...
Tradisi Omed-Omedan Banjar Kaja Kelurahan Sesetan Keca- Matan Denpasar Selatan
Tradisi Omed-Omedan Banjar Kaja Kelurahan Sesetan Keca- Matan Denpasar Selatan
Balinese always preserve cultural traditions as the inheritance of their ancestors. Omed-omedan tradition is a unique and rare tradition since such tradition cannot be encountered ...

