Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Clinical outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy (5x5 Gy) with a simultaneous integrated boost (5x6 Gy) in locally advanced rectal cancer.
View through CrossRef
60
Background:
Hypofractionated RT (5x5 Gy) with or without subsequent chemotherapy is a standard of care used at the National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland, as a preoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. To maximize the chance of achieving a complete response (CR), when surgery is not planned or when there are clinically involved lymph nodes located outside the standard TME field, RT can be augmented with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) delivering 5x6 Gy. This report aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of hypofractionated RT with a SIB in rectal cancer.
Methods:
From Dec 2018 to Sep 2022, 78 consecutive pts with a median age of 67 years (range 36–89 years), received hypofractionated RT utilizing the SIB-VMAT technique. The radiation dose fractionation was 5x5 Gy to the rectum, mesorectum and elective lymph nodes and a SIB to the GTV for a total dose of 30 Gy.
Results:
30 pts (38.5%) received a SIB for the rectal tumor, of which 15 pts (19.2%) were deemed unfit for surgery, 10 pts (12.8%) refused surgical treatment, 3 pts (3.8%) had an oligometastatic disease, and 2 pts (2.6%) had an advanced primary tumor. 48 pts (61.5%) received a SIB to the clinically involved lymph nodes located outside the standard TME field. All 78 pts completed RT as planned without interruptions or dose modifications and with an acceptable toxicity profile. There was a 26.9% (n = 21) incidence of G2 toxicities (diarrhea, proctitis, skin toxicity, cystitis or lumbosacral plexus neuropathy) and a 3.8% (n = 3) incidence of G3 toxicities (diarrhea or proctitis). After a median follow-up of 917 days (range 33–1927 days), an assessment of response was conducted in 68 cases. In 94.1% (n = 64) there was no progression at the site irradiated to a dose of 30 Gy. After completion of RT, mr-TRG was evaluated in 28 pts. In 46.4% (n = 13) mr-TRG 1-2 (cCR) was achieved. Of the 24 pts qualified for the watch and wait strategy, 17 had follow-up. Of this group, 64.7% (n = 11) remained progression-free, and 11 pts had an adequate evaluation for cCR (imaging and endoscopy), resulting in a 63.6% (n = 7) rate of cCR. 43 pts underwent surgery, of which 97.7% (n = 42) had R0 resection. In 41 cases pathological TRG was assessed according to AJCC or Ryan, of which 41.4% (n = 17) achieved TRG 0-1 (pCR). In 40 cases the operated pts had no initial metastatic spread, among them 67.5% (n = 27) remain disease-free. 67 pts reported disease-related symptoms before RT. After treatment, 89.6% (n = 60) of those pts achieved symptomatic improvement in either rectal bleeding, bowel frequency, or pain control.
Conclusions:
Hypofractionated RT with SIB-VMAT delivering a dose of 30 Gy/25 Gy/5 fractions provides good local control and is a safe and viable option for both young and elderly patients who will not undergo surgery and for patients with involved lymph nodes located outside the standard TME field to maximize the chance of achieving CR.
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Clinical outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy (5x5 Gy) with a simultaneous integrated boost (5x6 Gy) in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Description:
60
Background:
Hypofractionated RT (5x5 Gy) with or without subsequent chemotherapy is a standard of care used at the National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland, as a preoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer.
To maximize the chance of achieving a complete response (CR), when surgery is not planned or when there are clinically involved lymph nodes located outside the standard TME field, RT can be augmented with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) delivering 5x6 Gy.
This report aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of hypofractionated RT with a SIB in rectal cancer.
Methods:
From Dec 2018 to Sep 2022, 78 consecutive pts with a median age of 67 years (range 36–89 years), received hypofractionated RT utilizing the SIB-VMAT technique.
The radiation dose fractionation was 5x5 Gy to the rectum, mesorectum and elective lymph nodes and a SIB to the GTV for a total dose of 30 Gy.
Results:
30 pts (38.
5%) received a SIB for the rectal tumor, of which 15 pts (19.
2%) were deemed unfit for surgery, 10 pts (12.
8%) refused surgical treatment, 3 pts (3.
8%) had an oligometastatic disease, and 2 pts (2.
6%) had an advanced primary tumor.
48 pts (61.
5%) received a SIB to the clinically involved lymph nodes located outside the standard TME field.
All 78 pts completed RT as planned without interruptions or dose modifications and with an acceptable toxicity profile.
There was a 26.
9% (n = 21) incidence of G2 toxicities (diarrhea, proctitis, skin toxicity, cystitis or lumbosacral plexus neuropathy) and a 3.
8% (n = 3) incidence of G3 toxicities (diarrhea or proctitis).
After a median follow-up of 917 days (range 33–1927 days), an assessment of response was conducted in 68 cases.
In 94.
1% (n = 64) there was no progression at the site irradiated to a dose of 30 Gy.
After completion of RT, mr-TRG was evaluated in 28 pts.
In 46.
4% (n = 13) mr-TRG 1-2 (cCR) was achieved.
Of the 24 pts qualified for the watch and wait strategy, 17 had follow-up.
Of this group, 64.
7% (n = 11) remained progression-free, and 11 pts had an adequate evaluation for cCR (imaging and endoscopy), resulting in a 63.
6% (n = 7) rate of cCR.
43 pts underwent surgery, of which 97.
7% (n = 42) had R0 resection.
In 41 cases pathological TRG was assessed according to AJCC or Ryan, of which 41.
4% (n = 17) achieved TRG 0-1 (pCR).
In 40 cases the operated pts had no initial metastatic spread, among them 67.
5% (n = 27) remain disease-free.
67 pts reported disease-related symptoms before RT.
After treatment, 89.
6% (n = 60) of those pts achieved symptomatic improvement in either rectal bleeding, bowel frequency, or pain control.
Conclusions:
Hypofractionated RT with SIB-VMAT delivering a dose of 30 Gy/25 Gy/5 fractions provides good local control and is a safe and viable option for both young and elderly patients who will not undergo surgery and for patients with involved lymph nodes located outside the standard TME field to maximize the chance of achieving CR.
Related Results
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
<p dir="ltr">In recent decades, rectal cancer treatment has shifted from traditional surgical resection to include additional modalities such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy...
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
<p dir="ltr">In recent decades, rectal cancer treatment has shifted from traditional surgical resection to include additional modalities such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy...
UNCONVENTIONAL FRACTIONATION RADIOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN TREATMENT OF INOPERABLE LUNG CANCER
UNCONVENTIONAL FRACTIONATION RADIOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN TREATMENT OF INOPERABLE LUNG CANCER
The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated versus hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with inoperable lung cancer.Material and Met...
Quantitative Assessment of Rectal Dose–Volume Histogram (DVH) Constraint Deviations in Image-Guided Hypofractionated Prostate Radiotherapy
Quantitative Assessment of Rectal Dose–Volume Histogram (DVH) Constraint Deviations in Image-Guided Hypofractionated Prostate Radiotherapy
Introduction: We aimed to investigate changes in rectal dose during the treatment course for prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy with daily image-gu...
Abstract P4-12-22: Curative hypofractionated radiotherapy for stage I-III breast cancer patients- Experience from a tertiary cancer centre in South India
Abstract P4-12-22: Curative hypofractionated radiotherapy for stage I-III breast cancer patients- Experience from a tertiary cancer centre in South India
Abstract
Background Randomized controlled trials in Western population have demonstrated hypofractionated radiotherapy to be a safe and effective option as compared ...
Whole-breast hypofractionated IMRT and brachytherapy boost after conservative surgery for breast cancer: Early results of a prospective non-randomised trial.
Whole-breast hypofractionated IMRT and brachytherapy boost after conservative surgery for breast cancer: Early results of a prospective non-randomised trial.
46 Background: To report early results obtained in a prospective group of patients (pts) treated with whole breast IMRT radiotherapy plus a brachytherapy boost to the tumor bed af...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
The Clinical Outcome of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy With CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery for Perioptic Pituitary Adenoma
The Clinical Outcome of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy With CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery for Perioptic Pituitary Adenoma
Stereotactic radiation technique including single fraction radiosurgery and conventional fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is widely reported as an effective treatment of pitu...

