Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Governmental Policy of Supporting the Georgian Nobility under Alexander III: Debts and Estates

View through CrossRef
This article analyses the circumstances behind the decision to provide material assistance to the “impoverished” Georgian nobility by the ruling authorities of the Russian Empire in the 1870s–1890s. The Caucasian Governor-General, Grand Duke Mikhail Nikolaevich raised the issue in 1878 in connection with the uncovered large debt of some Georgian nobles to the Transcaucasian Order of Public Charity. The Governor-General asked to add up the debt of 3 million roubles pointing to several objective factors that prevented the nobles from paying their debts on time. But the Caucasian Committee only agreed to waive interest charges of the Georgian nobility which they had not been paying for several years. Even the efforts of the Grand Duke, who personally addressed Alexander II, did not yield results, since the government leaders were indifferent to the “noble question” at the time but strictly protected the interests of the Treasury, due to the deplorable state of the Empire’s finances after the Russo-Turkish war of 1877–1878. Only the change of political course under Alexander III allowed A. M. Dondukov-Korsakov, the new chief of the Caucasus, to raise the issue of material support for the Georgian nobility again. The author carries out a detailed analysis of the work of the Commission convened by Dondukov in Tiflis. Special attention is paid to the struggle that unfolded between the Minister of Finance N. H. Bunge and Dondukov, who eventually not only granted Georgian noblemen significant benefits when paying off debts in 1884 but also facilitated the opening of a branch of the Noble Land Bank in Tiflis in 1890. Dondukov was able to convince Alexander III that helping Georgian nobles was an integral part of such a key direction of his domestic policy as support for the local Russian nobility.
Ural Federal University
Title: The Governmental Policy of Supporting the Georgian Nobility under Alexander III: Debts and Estates
Description:
This article analyses the circumstances behind the decision to provide material assistance to the “impoverished” Georgian nobility by the ruling authorities of the Russian Empire in the 1870s–1890s.
The Caucasian Governor-General, Grand Duke Mikhail Nikolaevich raised the issue in 1878 in connection with the uncovered large debt of some Georgian nobles to the Transcaucasian Order of Public Charity.
The Governor-General asked to add up the debt of 3 million roubles pointing to several objective factors that prevented the nobles from paying their debts on time.
But the Caucasian Committee only agreed to waive interest charges of the Georgian nobility which they had not been paying for several years.
Even the efforts of the Grand Duke, who personally addressed Alexander II, did not yield results, since the government leaders were indifferent to the “noble question” at the time but strictly protected the interests of the Treasury, due to the deplorable state of the Empire’s finances after the Russo-Turkish war of 1877–1878.
Only the change of political course under Alexander III allowed A.
M.
Dondukov-Korsakov, the new chief of the Caucasus, to raise the issue of material support for the Georgian nobility again.
The author carries out a detailed analysis of the work of the Commission convened by Dondukov in Tiflis.
Special attention is paid to the struggle that unfolded between the Minister of Finance N.
H.
Bunge and Dondukov, who eventually not only granted Georgian noblemen significant benefits when paying off debts in 1884 but also facilitated the opening of a branch of the Noble Land Bank in Tiflis in 1890.
Dondukov was able to convince Alexander III that helping Georgian nobles was an integral part of such a key direction of his domestic policy as support for the local Russian nobility.

Related Results

Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
The role and significance of the Bosnian nobility in the historical currents of medieval Bosnia can be reliably traced in the 14th and 15th centuries when various socio-political f...
UNCLAIMED ESTATES IN WEST MALAYSIA: A LEGAL ANALYSIS AND REFORM PROPOSALS ON NON-ADMINISTERED ESTATES
UNCLAIMED ESTATES IN WEST MALAYSIA: A LEGAL ANALYSIS AND REFORM PROPOSALS ON NON-ADMINISTERED ESTATES
In West Malaysia, the existing legal framework categorises unclaimed estates into four distinct types namely, unclaimed money, undistributed funds, ownerless estates (bona vacantia...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
Some Issues of the Economic Aspect of the Georgian National Mentality
Some Issues of the Economic Aspect of the Georgian National Mentality
The national economic mentality, which was formed over the centuries under the influence of various factors, determines the nature of the nation's socio-economic rules and their en...
Nobility and Gentry in the Early Modern Atlantic World
Nobility and Gentry in the Early Modern Atlantic World
Early modern societies were organized in ranks or degrees, one of the highest being the nobility. The meaning of this word was different in the European countries but the superiori...
MPD physics performance studies in Bi+Bi collisions at √sNN = 9.2 GeV
MPD physics performance studies in Bi+Bi collisions at √sNN = 9.2 GeV
TheMulti-Purpose Detector (MPD) is one of the three experiments of the Nuclotron Ion Collider-fAcility (NICA) complex, which is currently under construction at the Joint Institute ...
CONTEMPORARY AZERBAIJANI–GEORGIAN LITERARY RELATIONS: LEILA ERADZE AND DILARA ALIYEVA
CONTEMPORARY AZERBAIJANI–GEORGIAN LITERARY RELATIONS: LEILA ERADZE AND DILARA ALIYEVA
Beginning from the mid-twentieth century, the literary friendship between Azerbaijan and Georgia – particularly in the field of poetry – entered a new stage within the framework of...
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Introduction This essay begins with the premise that resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation despite adversity (Garmezy and Rutter), and resilience building are importa...

Back to Top