Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Governmental Policy of Supporting the Georgian Nobility under Alexander III: Debts and Estates
View through CrossRef
This article analyses the circumstances behind the decision to provide material assistance to the “impoverished” Georgian nobility by the ruling authorities of the Russian Empire in the 1870s–1890s. The Caucasian Governor-General, Grand Duke Mikhail Nikolaevich raised the issue in 1878 in connection with the uncovered large debt of some Georgian nobles to the Transcaucasian Order of Public Charity. The Governor-General asked to add up the debt of 3 million roubles pointing to several objective factors that prevented the nobles from paying their debts on time. But the Caucasian Committee only agreed to waive interest charges of the Georgian nobility which they had not been paying for several years. Even the efforts of the Grand Duke, who personally addressed Alexander II, did not yield results, since the government leaders were indifferent to the “noble question” at the time but strictly protected the interests of the Treasury, due to the deplorable state of the Empire’s finances after the Russo-Turkish war of 1877–1878. Only the change of political course under Alexander III allowed A. M. Dondukov-Korsakov, the new chief of the Caucasus, to raise the issue of material support for the Georgian nobility again. The author carries out a detailed analysis of the work of the Commission convened by Dondukov in Tiflis. Special attention is paid to the struggle that unfolded between the Minister of Finance N. H. Bunge and Dondukov, who eventually not only granted Georgian noblemen significant benefits when paying off debts in 1884 but also facilitated the opening of a branch of the Noble Land Bank in Tiflis in 1890. Dondukov was able to convince Alexander III that helping Georgian nobles was an integral part of such a key direction of his domestic policy as support for the local Russian nobility.
Title: The Governmental Policy of Supporting the Georgian Nobility under Alexander III: Debts and Estates
Description:
This article analyses the circumstances behind the decision to provide material assistance to the “impoverished” Georgian nobility by the ruling authorities of the Russian Empire in the 1870s–1890s.
The Caucasian Governor-General, Grand Duke Mikhail Nikolaevich raised the issue in 1878 in connection with the uncovered large debt of some Georgian nobles to the Transcaucasian Order of Public Charity.
The Governor-General asked to add up the debt of 3 million roubles pointing to several objective factors that prevented the nobles from paying their debts on time.
But the Caucasian Committee only agreed to waive interest charges of the Georgian nobility which they had not been paying for several years.
Even the efforts of the Grand Duke, who personally addressed Alexander II, did not yield results, since the government leaders were indifferent to the “noble question” at the time but strictly protected the interests of the Treasury, due to the deplorable state of the Empire’s finances after the Russo-Turkish war of 1877–1878.
Only the change of political course under Alexander III allowed A.
M.
Dondukov-Korsakov, the new chief of the Caucasus, to raise the issue of material support for the Georgian nobility again.
The author carries out a detailed analysis of the work of the Commission convened by Dondukov in Tiflis.
Special attention is paid to the struggle that unfolded between the Minister of Finance N.
H.
Bunge and Dondukov, who eventually not only granted Georgian noblemen significant benefits when paying off debts in 1884 but also facilitated the opening of a branch of the Noble Land Bank in Tiflis in 1890.
Dondukov was able to convince Alexander III that helping Georgian nobles was an integral part of such a key direction of his domestic policy as support for the local Russian nobility.
Related Results
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
The role and significance of the Bosnian nobility in the historical currents of medieval Bosnia can be reliably traced in the 14th and 15th centuries when various socio-political f...
Some Issues of the Economic Aspect of the Georgian National Mentality
Some Issues of the Economic Aspect of the Georgian National Mentality
The national economic mentality, which was formed over the centuries under the influence of various factors, determines the nature of the nation's socio-economic rules and their en...
Nobility and Gentry in the Early Modern Atlantic World
Nobility and Gentry in the Early Modern Atlantic World
Early modern societies were organized in ranks or degrees, one of the highest being the nobility. The meaning of this word was different in the European countries but the superiori...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...
How Scientific Research Impacts Policy Cycle
How Scientific Research Impacts Policy Cycle
Scientific research is increasingly referenced in policy documents issued by international, national,
and regional organizations, reflecting its role in governance and decision-mak...
Dynamics of Religious Identity Change in the Context of Georgian Crypto-Orthodoxy
Dynamics of Religious Identity Change in the Context of Georgian Crypto-Orthodoxy
Abstract
In the process of the invasion wars of Shah Abbas the First (1571–1629), the history of the emergence of two Georgian language islands in Iran (Fereydany Georgian) and...
Sorption Behaviors of Light Lanthanides(III) (La(III), Ce(III), Pr(III), Nd(III)) and Cr(III) Using Nitrolite
Sorption Behaviors of Light Lanthanides(III) (La(III), Ce(III), Pr(III), Nd(III)) and Cr(III) Using Nitrolite
The sorption of light lanthanides(III) (La(III), Ce(III), Pr(III), Nd(III)) and chromium(III) ions from acidic solutions on Nitrolite was studied at varying ions concentrations, pH...
Mead in the Baltic Society: from Beekeepers to Nobility
Mead in the Baltic Society: from Beekeepers to Nobility
Although the living tradition of making mead and partaking of it has become extinct in Latvia and Lithuania in the course of the recent centuries, its traces can still be found in ...

