Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Effect of 3 Different Doses of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine (2.5µg, 5µg, and 10 µg) on Subarachnoid Block Characteristics: A Prospective Randomized Double Blind DoseResponse Trial

View through CrossRef
Background: The extended analgesic efficacy of intrathecal dexmedetomidine (ITD) has been investigated in a few clinical trials; however, there is a lack of conclusive evidence upon its ideal dosage. Objectives: To elucidate the dose-response relationship between ITD and subarachnoid block characteristics, particularly the duration of analgesia and differential analgesia (DA: defined as time difference from the offset of motor blockade to the first analgesic requirement on numerical rating scale ≥ 4.0). Study Design: Prospective, randomized double blind active control trial. Setting: Medical college teaching hospital. Methods: Ninety adult (18 – 60 years) patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries were randomized into 3 groups to receive intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine 3 mL with 2.5 µg (group BD2.5), 5µg (group BD5), or 10 µg (group BD10) dexmedetomidine in 0.5 mL normal saline. The 2 segment sensory regression times (TSSRT), duration of motor blockade analgesia, DA, and perioperative adverse effects were assessed. The primary outcome was duration of analgesia and DA. Statistics: ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis test, Chi-square (χ2), and Fisher’s exact test, significance: P < 0.05. Results: The onset of sensory block was significantly earlier in group BD10 compared with group BD5 (P = 0.035) and BD2.5 (P = 0.010) while the onset of motor block was significantly earlier in group BD10 compared with BD2.5 (P = 0.020). There was a significant and dose-dependent prolongation of the duration of sensory block (127.50, 149.17, and 187.50 minutes; P < 0.001), motor block (258.50, 331, and 365 minutes; P < 0.001), analgesia (306.17, 396.50, and 512 minutes; P < 0.001), and DA (47.67, 65.50, and147 minutes; P < 0.001) with escalating doses of ITD, respectively. Group BD10 required significantly fewer rescue analgesics compared with other 2 groups (P = 0.001). Except for mild sedation which was significantly higher in group BD10; all the groups were comparable with respect to hemodynamic and other adverse effects. Limitations: Lack of placebo group, exclusion of higher doses (15µg) of ITD, and short duration of postoperative follow-up. Conclusions: The addition of 10 µg compared with 2.5 µg or 5µg ITD to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine is associated with significantly earlier onset of sensory and motor block as well as prolonged duration of sensory block, motor block, analgesia, and DA with a comparable adverse effect profile. Key words: Analgesia, bupivacaine, dexmedetomidine, differential analgesia, intrathecal, pain, spinal anaesthesia
American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians
Title: Effect of 3 Different Doses of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine (2.5µg, 5µg, and 10 µg) on Subarachnoid Block Characteristics: A Prospective Randomized Double Blind DoseResponse Trial
Description:
Background: The extended analgesic efficacy of intrathecal dexmedetomidine (ITD) has been investigated in a few clinical trials; however, there is a lack of conclusive evidence upon its ideal dosage.
Objectives: To elucidate the dose-response relationship between ITD and subarachnoid block characteristics, particularly the duration of analgesia and differential analgesia (DA: defined as time difference from the offset of motor blockade to the first analgesic requirement on numerical rating scale ≥ 4.
0).
Study Design: Prospective, randomized double blind active control trial.
Setting: Medical college teaching hospital.
Methods: Ninety adult (18 – 60 years) patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries were randomized into 3 groups to receive intrathecal 0.
5% bupivacaine 3 mL with 2.
5 µg (group BD2.
5), 5µg (group BD5), or 10 µg (group BD10) dexmedetomidine in 0.
5 mL normal saline.
The 2 segment sensory regression times (TSSRT), duration of motor blockade analgesia, DA, and perioperative adverse effects were assessed.
The primary outcome was duration of analgesia and DA.
Statistics: ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis test, Chi-square (χ2), and Fisher’s exact test, significance: P < 0.
05.
Results: The onset of sensory block was significantly earlier in group BD10 compared with group BD5 (P = 0.
035) and BD2.
5 (P = 0.
010) while the onset of motor block was significantly earlier in group BD10 compared with BD2.
5 (P = 0.
020).
There was a significant and dose-dependent prolongation of the duration of sensory block (127.
50, 149.
17, and 187.
50 minutes; P < 0.
001), motor block (258.
50, 331, and 365 minutes; P < 0.
001), analgesia (306.
17, 396.
50, and 512 minutes; P < 0.
001), and DA (47.
67, 65.
50, and147 minutes; P < 0.
001) with escalating doses of ITD, respectively.
Group BD10 required significantly fewer rescue analgesics compared with other 2 groups (P = 0.
001).
Except for mild sedation which was significantly higher in group BD10; all the groups were comparable with respect to hemodynamic and other adverse effects.
Limitations: Lack of placebo group, exclusion of higher doses (15µg) of ITD, and short duration of postoperative follow-up.
Conclusions: The addition of 10 µg compared with 2.
5 µg or 5µg ITD to 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine is associated with significantly earlier onset of sensory and motor block as well as prolonged duration of sensory block, motor block, analgesia, and DA with a comparable adverse effect profile.
Key words: Analgesia, bupivacaine, dexmedetomidine, differential analgesia, intrathecal, pain, spinal anaesthesia.

Related Results

Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Comparative evaluation of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in patients undergoing lower-limb surgery under spinal anesthesia
Comparative evaluation of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in patients undergoing lower-limb surgery under spinal anesthesia
Background: Different adjuvants have been studied to enhance the quality and extend the duration of spinal anesthesia. The use of dexmedetomidine has been increased in recent times...
Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Background & objectives: The anesthetists have been trying various adjuvants with local anesthetic agents for spinal anesthesia to prolong the duration of analgesia and to redu...
Block Quality Of Dexmedetomidine-Based Spinal Anaesthesia In Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Meta-Analysis Of Clinical Trials
Block Quality Of Dexmedetomidine-Based Spinal Anaesthesia In Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Meta-Analysis Of Clinical Trials
Background: Dexmedetomidine is used as an adjuvant to local anesthetic agents in spinal anesthesia and is believed to increase quality of sensory and motor blocks. Our aim was to a...

Back to Top