Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Effect of 3 Different Doses of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine (2.5µg, 5µg, and 10 µg) on Subarachnoid Block Characteristics: A Prospective Randomized Double Blind DoseResponse Trial
View through CrossRef
Background: The extended analgesic efficacy of intrathecal dexmedetomidine (ITD) has been
investigated in a few clinical trials; however, there is a lack of conclusive evidence upon its ideal
dosage.
Objectives: To elucidate the dose-response relationship between ITD and subarachnoid block
characteristics, particularly the duration of analgesia and differential analgesia (DA: defined as time
difference from the offset of motor blockade to the first analgesic requirement on numerical rating
scale ≥ 4.0).
Study Design: Prospective, randomized double blind active control trial.
Setting: Medical college teaching hospital.
Methods: Ninety adult (18 – 60 years) patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb
surgeries were randomized into 3 groups to receive intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine 3 mL with 2.5 µg
(group BD2.5), 5µg (group BD5), or 10 µg (group BD10) dexmedetomidine in 0.5 mL normal saline.
The 2 segment sensory regression times (TSSRT), duration of motor blockade analgesia, DA, and
perioperative adverse effects were assessed. The primary outcome was duration of analgesia and DA.
Statistics: ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis test, Chi-square (χ2), and Fisher’s exact test, significance: P < 0.05.
Results: The onset of sensory block was significantly earlier in group BD10 compared with group
BD5 (P = 0.035) and BD2.5 (P = 0.010) while the onset of motor block was significantly earlier in group
BD10 compared with BD2.5 (P = 0.020). There was a significant and dose-dependent prolongation of
the duration of sensory block (127.50, 149.17, and 187.50 minutes; P < 0.001), motor block (258.50,
331, and 365 minutes; P < 0.001), analgesia (306.17, 396.50, and 512 minutes; P < 0.001), and DA
(47.67, 65.50, and147 minutes; P < 0.001) with escalating doses of ITD, respectively. Group BD10
required significantly fewer rescue analgesics compared with other 2 groups (P = 0.001). Except for
mild sedation which was significantly higher in group BD10; all the groups were comparable with
respect to hemodynamic and other adverse effects.
Limitations: Lack of placebo group, exclusion of higher doses (15µg) of ITD, and short duration of
postoperative follow-up.
Conclusions: The addition of 10 µg compared with 2.5 µg or 5µg ITD to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine
is associated with significantly earlier onset of sensory and motor block as well as prolonged duration
of sensory block, motor block, analgesia, and DA with a comparable adverse effect profile.
Key words: Analgesia, bupivacaine, dexmedetomidine, differential analgesia, intrathecal, pain,
spinal anaesthesia
Title: Effect of 3 Different Doses of Intrathecal
Dexmedetomidine (2.5µg, 5µg, and 10 µg)
on Subarachnoid Block Characteristics: A
Prospective Randomized Double Blind DoseResponse Trial
Description:
Background: The extended analgesic efficacy of intrathecal dexmedetomidine (ITD) has been
investigated in a few clinical trials; however, there is a lack of conclusive evidence upon its ideal
dosage.
Objectives: To elucidate the dose-response relationship between ITD and subarachnoid block
characteristics, particularly the duration of analgesia and differential analgesia (DA: defined as time
difference from the offset of motor blockade to the first analgesic requirement on numerical rating
scale ≥ 4.
0).
Study Design: Prospective, randomized double blind active control trial.
Setting: Medical college teaching hospital.
Methods: Ninety adult (18 – 60 years) patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb
surgeries were randomized into 3 groups to receive intrathecal 0.
5% bupivacaine 3 mL with 2.
5 µg
(group BD2.
5), 5µg (group BD5), or 10 µg (group BD10) dexmedetomidine in 0.
5 mL normal saline.
The 2 segment sensory regression times (TSSRT), duration of motor blockade analgesia, DA, and
perioperative adverse effects were assessed.
The primary outcome was duration of analgesia and DA.
Statistics: ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis test, Chi-square (χ2), and Fisher’s exact test, significance: P < 0.
05.
Results: The onset of sensory block was significantly earlier in group BD10 compared with group
BD5 (P = 0.
035) and BD2.
5 (P = 0.
010) while the onset of motor block was significantly earlier in group
BD10 compared with BD2.
5 (P = 0.
020).
There was a significant and dose-dependent prolongation of
the duration of sensory block (127.
50, 149.
17, and 187.
50 minutes; P < 0.
001), motor block (258.
50,
331, and 365 minutes; P < 0.
001), analgesia (306.
17, 396.
50, and 512 minutes; P < 0.
001), and DA
(47.
67, 65.
50, and147 minutes; P < 0.
001) with escalating doses of ITD, respectively.
Group BD10
required significantly fewer rescue analgesics compared with other 2 groups (P = 0.
001).
Except for
mild sedation which was significantly higher in group BD10; all the groups were comparable with
respect to hemodynamic and other adverse effects.
Limitations: Lack of placebo group, exclusion of higher doses (15µg) of ITD, and short duration of
postoperative follow-up.
Conclusions: The addition of 10 µg compared with 2.
5 µg or 5µg ITD to 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine
is associated with significantly earlier onset of sensory and motor block as well as prolonged duration
of sensory block, motor block, analgesia, and DA with a comparable adverse effect profile.
Key words: Analgesia, bupivacaine, dexmedetomidine, differential analgesia, intrathecal, pain,
spinal anaesthesia.
Related Results
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Comparative evaluation of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in patients undergoing lower-limb surgery under spinal anesthesia
Comparative evaluation of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in patients undergoing lower-limb surgery under spinal anesthesia
Background: Different adjuvants have been studied to enhance the quality and extend the duration of spinal anesthesia. The use of dexmedetomidine has been increased in recent times...
Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Background & objectives: The anesthetists have been trying various adjuvants with local anesthetic agents for spinal anesthesia to prolong the duration of analgesia and to redu...
<b>Effects of Three Different Doses of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine Added to Bupivacaine on Effectiveness of Subarachnoid Block in Elective Caesarean Sections: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study</b>
<b>Effects of Three Different Doses of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine Added to Bupivacaine on Effectiveness of Subarachnoid Block in Elective Caesarean Sections: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study</b>
Background: Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine is commonly used for elective cesarean section, but its limited postoperative analgesic duration and dose-related hemodyna...
Intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulphate for postoperative analgesia and stress response after caesarean delivery; randomized controlled double‐blind study
Intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulphate for postoperative analgesia and stress response after caesarean delivery; randomized controlled double‐blind study
AbstractBackgroundVarious adjuvants were added to intrathecal anaesthetics to improve quality of the block and postoperative analgesia. We hypothesized that intrathecal dexmedetomi...
Effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine coadministered with hyperbaric bupivacaine in the lower abdominal surgery: Results of a double-blind, randomized, and controlled trial between two different doses
Effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine coadministered with hyperbaric bupivacaine in the lower abdominal surgery: Results of a double-blind, randomized, and controlled trial between two different doses
Background: Although various adjuvants have been added to local anesthetic agents to potentiate its effect, dexmedetomidine is a relatively new drug with only a fewer studies.
Aim...
Block Quality Of Dexmedetomidine-Based Spinal Anaesthesia In Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Meta-Analysis Of Clinical Trials
Block Quality Of Dexmedetomidine-Based Spinal Anaesthesia In Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Meta-Analysis Of Clinical Trials
Background: Dexmedetomidine is used as an adjuvant to local anesthetic agents in spinal anesthesia and is believed to increase quality of sensory and motor blocks. Our aim was to a...
COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE VERSUS FENTANYL AS ADJUVANTS TO BUPIVACAINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY
COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE VERSUS FENTANYL AS ADJUVANTS TO BUPIVACAINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY
Background:The supraclavicular approach to blockage of nerves around the brachial plexus is a commonly used technique for upper extremity surgical procedures. The performanc...

