Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Reinvestigation of the role of the optic vesicle in embryonic lens induction
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The induction of the lens by the optic vesicle in amphibians is often cited as support for the view that a single inductive event can lead to determination in a multipotent tissue. This conclusion is based on transplantation experiments whose results indicate that many regions of embryonic ectoderm which would normally form epidermis can form a lens if brought into contact with the optic vesicle. Although additional evidence argues that during normal development other tissues, acting before the optic vesicle, also contribute to lens induction, it is still widely held, on the basis of these transplantation experiments, that the optic vesicle alone can elicit lens formation in ectoderm. While testing this conclusion by transplanting optic vesicles beneath ventral ectoderm in Xenopus laevis embryos, it became apparent that contamination of optic vesicles by presumptive lens ectoderm cells can generate lenses in these experiments, illustrating the need for adequate host and donor marking procedures. Since previous studies rarely used host and donor marking, it was not clear whether they actually demonstrated that the optic vesicle can induce lenses. Using careful host and donor marking procedures with horseradish peroxidase as a lineage tracer, we show that the optic vesicle cannot stimulate lens formation in neurula- or gastrula-stage ectoderm of Xenopus laevis. Since the general conclusion that the optic vesicle is sufficient for lens induction rests on studies in many organisms, we felt it was important to begin to test this conclusion in other amphibians as well. Similar experiments were therefore performed with Rana palustris embryos, since it was in this organism that optic vesicle transplant studies had originally argued that this tissue alone can cause lens induction. Under conditions similar to those used in the original report, but with careful controls to assess the origin of lenses in transplants, we found that the optic vesicle alone cannot elicit lens formation. Our data lead us to propose that the optic vesicle in amphibians is not generally sufficient for lens induction. Instead, we argue that lens induction occurs by a multistep process in which an essential phase in lens determination occurs as a result of inductive interactions preceding contact of ectoderm with the optic vesicle.
Title: Reinvestigation of the role of the optic vesicle in embryonic lens induction
Description:
Abstract
The induction of the lens by the optic vesicle in amphibians is often cited as support for the view that a single inductive event can lead to determination in a multipotent tissue.
This conclusion is based on transplantation experiments whose results indicate that many regions of embryonic ectoderm which would normally form epidermis can form a lens if brought into contact with the optic vesicle.
Although additional evidence argues that during normal development other tissues, acting before the optic vesicle, also contribute to lens induction, it is still widely held, on the basis of these transplantation experiments, that the optic vesicle alone can elicit lens formation in ectoderm.
While testing this conclusion by transplanting optic vesicles beneath ventral ectoderm in Xenopus laevis embryos, it became apparent that contamination of optic vesicles by presumptive lens ectoderm cells can generate lenses in these experiments, illustrating the need for adequate host and donor marking procedures.
Since previous studies rarely used host and donor marking, it was not clear whether they actually demonstrated that the optic vesicle can induce lenses.
Using careful host and donor marking procedures with horseradish peroxidase as a lineage tracer, we show that the optic vesicle cannot stimulate lens formation in neurula- or gastrula-stage ectoderm of Xenopus laevis.
Since the general conclusion that the optic vesicle is sufficient for lens induction rests on studies in many organisms, we felt it was important to begin to test this conclusion in other amphibians as well.
Similar experiments were therefore performed with Rana palustris embryos, since it was in this organism that optic vesicle transplant studies had originally argued that this tissue alone can cause lens induction.
Under conditions similar to those used in the original report, but with careful controls to assess the origin of lenses in transplants, we found that the optic vesicle alone cannot elicit lens formation.
Our data lead us to propose that the optic vesicle in amphibians is not generally sufficient for lens induction.
Instead, we argue that lens induction occurs by a multistep process in which an essential phase in lens determination occurs as a result of inductive interactions preceding contact of ectoderm with the optic vesicle.
Related Results
RPE specification in the chick is mediated by surface ectoderm-derived BMP and Wnt signalling
RPE specification in the chick is mediated by surface ectoderm-derived BMP and Wnt signalling
The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is indispensable for vertebrate eye development and vision. In the classical model of optic vesicle patterning, the surface ectoderm produces f...
Neuritis optik idiopatik dengan penyerta central serous chorioretinopathy sebagai manifestasi chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy: Sebuah laporan kasus
Neuritis optik idiopatik dengan penyerta central serous chorioretinopathy sebagai manifestasi chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy: Sebuah laporan kasus
Introduction: Idiopathic optic neuritis is an optic neuropathy with characteristics of optic nerve dysfunction that can be caused by various disorders of the optic nerve, including...
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
Lens Induction
Lens Induction
AbstractLens tissue develops from the embryonic head ectoderm through its interaction with the retinal primordium, the optic vesicle. This developmental mechanism has served as a p...
Outcomes Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML in First Completion Remission Are Comparable between MRD Negative Patients and MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction Only and Are Superior to MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction and
Outcomes Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML in First Completion Remission Are Comparable between MRD Negative Patients and MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction Only and Are Superior to MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction and
Background:
Data suggests that the presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) at the time of transplant for AML portends a poor prognosis. The timing of MRD asses...
Clinical features of COVID-19-related optic neuritis: a retrospective study
Clinical features of COVID-19-related optic neuritis: a retrospective study
ObjectiveThis retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical features of optic neuritis associated with COVID-19 (COVID-19 ON), comparing them with neuromyelitis optica-asso...
Optic Nerve Disorders
Optic Nerve Disorders
Abstract
Just as neuro-ophthalmology links ophthalmology with other medical specialties, so too the optic nerve links the eye with the central nervous system. Thus, ...
Comparative Clinical Performance of Rigid versus Soft Hyper Dk Contact Lenses Used for Continuous Wear
Comparative Clinical Performance of Rigid versus Soft Hyper Dk Contact Lenses Used for Continuous Wear
ABSTRACT
Purpose.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the comparative clinical performance of two hyper Dk contac...

