Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Do Robo-Advisors As Moderating Variables Weaken The Overconfidence and Loss Aversion Behavior Bias of Young Investors’ Mutual Fund Investment Decisions?

View through CrossRef
Background: Behavioral bias factors influence individual decision-making. Technological innovations in the financial services industry have introduced automated financial advisors, or robo-advisors, to assist in mutual fund investment decisions and reduce behavioral biases. Purpose: This study aims to prove the influence of overconfidence and loss aversion behavior bias on mutual fund investment decisions by using robo-advisors as moderator variables.Design/methodology/approach: The research sample was 100 respondents with the criteria of young investors in the age range of 18 to 25 who invested in mutual funds for the last five years and were officially registered with the Financial Services Authority. The data processing method uses multiple linear analysis with moderation dummy variable, using a robo-advisor or not.Finding/Result: The results indicate that overconfidence and loss aversion biases significantly impact mutual fund investment decisions positively. Apart from that, the results also show that robo-advisors succeed in weakening the relationship between overconfidence bias and mutual fund investment decisions. Meanwhile, robo-advisors show results that cannot moderate the relationship between loss aversion and mutual fund investment decisions.Conclusion: Robo-advisors moderate the relationship between overconfidence bias and investment decisions but do not moderate the relationship between loss aversion and mutual fund investment decisions. The high overconfidence is caused by the ease of access to information related to investment assets that is widely spread through social media. Young investors are expected to be able to screen all information related to investment knowledge to reduce loss aversion from young investors. It can help investors make more rational decisions.Originality/value (State of the art):This research is unique because it examines the behavioral biases associated with robo-advisors on investment decisions, especially investments in mutual funds. This research is novel and includes artificial intelligence technology developing in finance using robo-advisor and mutual fund investment. These have managerial implications, such as the high overconfidence in the younger generation due to easy access to information related to investment assets, which is widely spread via social media. Knowledge related to finance is considered capable of reducing loss aversion from young investors to help them make more rational and better decisions. Robo-advisor technology has reduced the irrationality of mutual fund investors' investment decisions. The research results show that overconfidence and loss aversion bias positively and significantly influence investment decisions. Apart from that, the results also show that robo-advisors succeed in weakening the relationship between overconfidence bias and investment decisions. Meanwhile, robo-advisors show results that cannot moderate the relationship between loss aversion and investment decisions. Keywords: Robo-advisor, behavioral bias, overconfidence, loss aversion, mutual fund investment decision
Title: Do Robo-Advisors As Moderating Variables Weaken The Overconfidence and Loss Aversion Behavior Bias of Young Investors’ Mutual Fund Investment Decisions?
Description:
Background: Behavioral bias factors influence individual decision-making.
Technological innovations in the financial services industry have introduced automated financial advisors, or robo-advisors, to assist in mutual fund investment decisions and reduce behavioral biases.
Purpose: This study aims to prove the influence of overconfidence and loss aversion behavior bias on mutual fund investment decisions by using robo-advisors as moderator variables.
Design/methodology/approach: The research sample was 100 respondents with the criteria of young investors in the age range of 18 to 25 who invested in mutual funds for the last five years and were officially registered with the Financial Services Authority.
The data processing method uses multiple linear analysis with moderation dummy variable, using a robo-advisor or not.
Finding/Result: The results indicate that overconfidence and loss aversion biases significantly impact mutual fund investment decisions positively.
Apart from that, the results also show that robo-advisors succeed in weakening the relationship between overconfidence bias and mutual fund investment decisions.
Meanwhile, robo-advisors show results that cannot moderate the relationship between loss aversion and mutual fund investment decisions.
Conclusion: Robo-advisors moderate the relationship between overconfidence bias and investment decisions but do not moderate the relationship between loss aversion and mutual fund investment decisions.
The high overconfidence is caused by the ease of access to information related to investment assets that is widely spread through social media.
Young investors are expected to be able to screen all information related to investment knowledge to reduce loss aversion from young investors.
It can help investors make more rational decisions.
Originality/value (State of the art):This research is unique because it examines the behavioral biases associated with robo-advisors on investment decisions, especially investments in mutual funds.
This research is novel and includes artificial intelligence technology developing in finance using robo-advisor and mutual fund investment.
These have managerial implications, such as the high overconfidence in the younger generation due to easy access to information related to investment assets, which is widely spread via social media.
Knowledge related to finance is considered capable of reducing loss aversion from young investors to help them make more rational and better decisions.
Robo-advisor technology has reduced the irrationality of mutual fund investors' investment decisions.
The research results show that overconfidence and loss aversion bias positively and significantly influence investment decisions.
Apart from that, the results also show that robo-advisors succeed in weakening the relationship between overconfidence bias and investment decisions.
Meanwhile, robo-advisors show results that cannot moderate the relationship between loss aversion and investment decisions.
Keywords: Robo-advisor, behavioral bias, overconfidence, loss aversion, mutual fund investment decision.

Related Results

PEMBENTUKAN KARAKTER SOSIAL BERBASIS TRADISI ROBO-ROBO MASYARAKAT MELAYU MEMPAWAH
PEMBENTUKAN KARAKTER SOSIAL BERBASIS TRADISI ROBO-ROBO MASYARAKAT MELAYU MEMPAWAH
Tradisi Robo-Robo Masyarakat Melayu Mempawah merupakan ritual tolak bala yang dilaksanakan setiap tahun pada hari Rabu terakhir bulan Safar. Tradisi ini mencerminkan nilai-nilai so...
Risk Tolerance, Overconfidence and Investment Decisions in Nepal
Risk Tolerance, Overconfidence and Investment Decisions in Nepal
In the present globalized, modernized and digitalized business environment, investors are attracted to the stock market for their investment in financial assets rather than real as...
The Moderating Role of Fund Size on the Relationship between Overconfidence and Portfolio Financial Performance of Mutual Funds in Kenya
The Moderating Role of Fund Size on the Relationship between Overconfidence and Portfolio Financial Performance of Mutual Funds in Kenya
A decline in financial performance has recently been observed for a number of mutual funds in Kenya. Overall, differences in important metrics show inconsistent economic performanc...
Robo-Advisors: A Closer Look
Robo-Advisors: A Closer Look
Robo-advisors have been touted by the Department of Labor as a source of investment advice that can benefit retirement investors by minimizing costs and avoiding conflicts of inter...
Abstract 73: Dysregulation of Robo-4 causes Pathological Cerebrovascular Angiogenesis in Diabetes
Abstract 73: Dysregulation of Robo-4 causes Pathological Cerebrovascular Angiogenesis in Diabetes
Diabetes increases the risk and exacerbates the progress of cerebral complications including stroke and cognitive impairment. Diabetic Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats suffer loss of vascul...
AN EVALUATION OF ROBO-ADVISOR RISK ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRES IN SELECTED ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMIES
AN EVALUATION OF ROBO-ADVISOR RISK ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRES IN SELECTED ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMIES
This study was conducted to evaluate the risk assessment questionnaires of a sample of 30 robo-advisors from seven selected Asia Pacific economies. Using a descriptive research app...

Back to Top