Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Producer/User Distinction in Journalism
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Journalism can be defined as a communication process between producers and consumers. Traditionally, both ends have been addressed as separate spheres. Journalism and journalism studies developed around the study of journalism producers—that is, journalists and their professional identities and practices. The audience was long considered the end point of journalism; the public sphere was where journalism was consumed. Rather than also studying audiences’ news use practices, the audience was generally imagined as a mass of passive sensation seekers unappreciative of the value of good journalism and taken for granted as a result. This dichotomous view of users and producers has since then been challenged.
First, the inequality in attention given to producers over users was addressed during a sociological turn in the study of journalism since the 1990s. This “turn” inspired a series of seminal studies focusing on the audience of journalism, showing how layered people’s interpretative practices are and how these are contextually shaped. Although journalism studies in the 21st century still tend to orient their gaze more to producers than users, the audience’s part in shaping the role of journalism in society is being increasingly acknowledged.
In parallel, with the continuing advancements in information and communication technologies, the conceptual distinction between producers and users in itself was questioned. Whereas the role of audiences in producing news was already explored in studies of community media and public journalism, it was the adoption of digital media that led to the blurring of lines between media producers and users. This distinction has encouraged journalism researchers to explore practices such as citizen and participatory journalism, leading to new conceptions of the user/producer dimension in journalism.
The user/producer dimension in journalism may be blurred, but it has not dissolved. Especially from a more structural perspective, professional journalists and news organizations still have preferential access to the news ecosystem and larger impact on the policy agenda. Conceptually however, news users should be conceived as potential contributors to the production and distribution of journalism. As such, news users are not the end point of journalism but an essential part of it.
Title: The Producer/User Distinction in Journalism
Description:
Abstract
Journalism can be defined as a communication process between producers and consumers.
Traditionally, both ends have been addressed as separate spheres.
Journalism and journalism studies developed around the study of journalism producers—that is, journalists and their professional identities and practices.
The audience was long considered the end point of journalism; the public sphere was where journalism was consumed.
Rather than also studying audiences’ news use practices, the audience was generally imagined as a mass of passive sensation seekers unappreciative of the value of good journalism and taken for granted as a result.
This dichotomous view of users and producers has since then been challenged.
First, the inequality in attention given to producers over users was addressed during a sociological turn in the study of journalism since the 1990s.
This “turn” inspired a series of seminal studies focusing on the audience of journalism, showing how layered people’s interpretative practices are and how these are contextually shaped.
Although journalism studies in the 21st century still tend to orient their gaze more to producers than users, the audience’s part in shaping the role of journalism in society is being increasingly acknowledged.
In parallel, with the continuing advancements in information and communication technologies, the conceptual distinction between producers and users in itself was questioned.
Whereas the role of audiences in producing news was already explored in studies of community media and public journalism, it was the adoption of digital media that led to the blurring of lines between media producers and users.
This distinction has encouraged journalism researchers to explore practices such as citizen and participatory journalism, leading to new conceptions of the user/producer dimension in journalism.
The user/producer dimension in journalism may be blurred, but it has not dissolved.
Especially from a more structural perspective, professional journalists and news organizations still have preferential access to the news ecosystem and larger impact on the policy agenda.
Conceptually however, news users should be conceived as potential contributors to the production and distribution of journalism.
As such, news users are not the end point of journalism but an essential part of it.
Related Results
Peranan Citizen Journalism di Media Online
Peranan Citizen Journalism di Media Online
Abstract. Along with the times, the media has also experienced a very large development so that the emergence of the internet as a change that can provide information to the public...
Advocacy Journalism in the Digital Age: Balancing Ethical Implications and Contemporary Realities
Advocacy Journalism in the Digital Age: Balancing Ethical Implications and Contemporary Realities
Over the past few decades, journalism has changed tremendously, moving from traditional objective reporting to a more subjective and opinionated approach. Advocacy journalism is a ...
Looking back at journalism ethics research over the past decade: An analysis of research in
digital journalism
,
journalism
,
journalism practice
Looking back at journalism ethics research over the past decade: An analysis of research in
digital journalism
,
journalism
,
journalism practice
This study aims to identify research trends and central concepts in the field of journalism ethics over the past decade. Focusing on four major journals— Digital Journalism, Journa...
“George Orwell Invented Journalism Studies”
“George Orwell Invented Journalism Studies”
To inaugurate our series of conversations with scholars in journalism studies with a view to securing some useful insights into the history and practice of journalism education, Pr...
Exploring the Normative Foundation of Journalism Education: Nordic Journalism Educators’ Conceptions of Future Journalism and Professional Qualifications
Exploring the Normative Foundation of Journalism Education: Nordic Journalism Educators’ Conceptions of Future Journalism and Professional Qualifications
This article deals with Nordic journalism educators’ conceptions of journalism by placing the concept of normativity at the center. The values, norms and ideas concerning journalis...
Quantifying global digital journalism research: a bibliometric landscape
Quantifying global digital journalism research: a bibliometric landscape
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a comprehensive analysis of the current status and development of the digital journalism field from 1987 to 2021 using the Dimensions...
Activist and Radical Journalism
Activist and Radical Journalism
Activist and radical journalism, and radical media as its outlet, are defined as media and journalism that posit an alternative vision to the current state of affairs and its polic...
Tracing the Trajectory: A Literature Review on Racism in Canadian Journalism
Tracing the Trajectory: A Literature Review on Racism in Canadian Journalism
Racial inequities and the lack of racial representation within Canada's journalism industry are persistent. Existing literature on the underrepresentation of Black, Indigenous or a...

