Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Framing the Innovation Mindset

View through CrossRef
Aim/Purpose: To build the skills of innovation, we must first establish a framework for the belief system that surrounds effective innovation practice. In building any belief system, sometimes outdated beliefs need to be replaced with better, more carefully researched ideas. One such belief, discovered in our research and elsewhere, is that creativity is innate and that great ideas arise through chance or happenstance. Background: One belief regarding innovation and creativity, discovered in our research and elsewhere, is the belief that creativity is innate. History has repeatedly shown this to be untrue, yet people still believe it. We have found within our research another belief is that innovation happens through random, unstructured processes -- that great ideas arise through chance or happenstance. However, participants also believed that innovation is a skill. If someone believes innovation is a skill but also believes innovation is innate, random, and unstructured, this disconnect presents obstacles for the training and development of innovation skills. Methodology: This research is based on a combination of background research and direct survey of innovators, educators, scientists, and engineers, in addition to the general public. The survey is used to illuminate the nature of significant beliefs related to creativity and innovation practice. Contribution: We examine the myths and truths behind creativity as well as the false beliefs behind innovation as we present a closed model for innovation and the key framing elements needed to build a successful, trainable, developable system that is the innovation mindset. And like any skill, creativity and innovation can be taught and learned using tools and processes that can be followed, tracked, and documented. If innovation is a skill, creativity should not re-quire magic or the production of ideas out of thin air. Findings: This paper identifies the historic nature of creativity as well as the general strategies used by innovators in implementing innovation practices and pro-poses a framework that supports the effective development of the innovation mindset. Recommendations for Practitioners: Apply the framework and encourage ideation and innovation participants to appreciate that they can learn to be creative and innovative. Start as early as possible in the education process, as all of these skills can be instructed at early ages. Recommendations for Researchers: Continue to gather survey data to support a refined understanding of the motivations behind the disconnect between innovation as a methodical skill and the beliefs in the use of random ideation techniques. Impact on Society: Transforming the understanding of creativity and innovation from one of mythical belief to one of methodical skill application will dramatically alter the lifelong impact of knowledge gained in support of global economic and environmental challenges. Future Research: A continuation of the recommended research paths and collaboration with other creativity researchers leading to improved methods for dissuading mythical beliefs toward formalized, systematic ideation and innovation practices. *** NOTE: This Proceedings paper was revised and published in the journal Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 18, 83-102. Click DOWNLOAD PDF to download the published paper. ***
Title: Framing the Innovation Mindset
Description:
Aim/Purpose: To build the skills of innovation, we must first establish a framework for the belief system that surrounds effective innovation practice.
In building any belief system, sometimes outdated beliefs need to be replaced with better, more carefully researched ideas.
One such belief, discovered in our research and elsewhere, is that creativity is innate and that great ideas arise through chance or happenstance.
Background: One belief regarding innovation and creativity, discovered in our research and elsewhere, is the belief that creativity is innate.
History has repeatedly shown this to be untrue, yet people still believe it.
We have found within our research another belief is that innovation happens through random, unstructured processes -- that great ideas arise through chance or happenstance.
However, participants also believed that innovation is a skill.
If someone believes innovation is a skill but also believes innovation is innate, random, and unstructured, this disconnect presents obstacles for the training and development of innovation skills.
Methodology: This research is based on a combination of background research and direct survey of innovators, educators, scientists, and engineers, in addition to the general public.
The survey is used to illuminate the nature of significant beliefs related to creativity and innovation practice.
Contribution: We examine the myths and truths behind creativity as well as the false beliefs behind innovation as we present a closed model for innovation and the key framing elements needed to build a successful, trainable, developable system that is the innovation mindset.
And like any skill, creativity and innovation can be taught and learned using tools and processes that can be followed, tracked, and documented.
If innovation is a skill, creativity should not re-quire magic or the production of ideas out of thin air.
Findings: This paper identifies the historic nature of creativity as well as the general strategies used by innovators in implementing innovation practices and pro-poses a framework that supports the effective development of the innovation mindset.
Recommendations for Practitioners: Apply the framework and encourage ideation and innovation participants to appreciate that they can learn to be creative and innovative.
Start as early as possible in the education process, as all of these skills can be instructed at early ages.
Recommendations for Researchers: Continue to gather survey data to support a refined understanding of the motivations behind the disconnect between innovation as a methodical skill and the beliefs in the use of random ideation techniques.
Impact on Society: Transforming the understanding of creativity and innovation from one of mythical belief to one of methodical skill application will dramatically alter the lifelong impact of knowledge gained in support of global economic and environmental challenges.
Future Research: A continuation of the recommended research paths and collaboration with other creativity researchers leading to improved methods for dissuading mythical beliefs toward formalized, systematic ideation and innovation practices.
*** NOTE: This Proceedings paper was revised and published in the journal Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 18, 83-102.
Click DOWNLOAD PDF to download the published paper.
***.

Related Results

A Comprehensive Investigation Into The Effects of Mindset
A Comprehensive Investigation Into The Effects of Mindset
Why do some adolescents struggle more with academic setbacks and challenges than others? Professor Carol Dweck’s research highlights the importance of mindset—beliefs about one’s a...
Framing the Innovation Mindset
Framing the Innovation Mindset
Aim/Purpose: To build the skills of innovation, we must first establish a framework for the belief system that surrounds effective innovation practice. In building any belief syst...
The Digital Mindset : Theoretical Foundation and Empirical Evidence
The Digital Mindset : Theoretical Foundation and Empirical Evidence
Digital technologies are transforming the future of work, highlighting the increasing importance of human capital within organizations. A pivotal factor in this shift is the “digit...
How growth mindset influences mathematics achievements: A study of Chinese middle school students
How growth mindset influences mathematics achievements: A study of Chinese middle school students
IntroductionIt has been suggested that students with growth mindsets are more likely to achieve better mathematics learning results than their counterparts with fixed mindsets. How...
Innovation, Innovation Strategy, and Strategic Innovation
Innovation, Innovation Strategy, and Strategic Innovation
Abstract Purpose The purposes of this chapter are to propose definitions of innovation, product innovation, business mode...
Innovation ambidexterity effects on product innovation performance: the mediating role of decentralization
Innovation ambidexterity effects on product innovation performance: the mediating role of decentralization
PurposeThe purpose of the study was to analyse the impact of innovation ambidexterity represented by explorative and exploitative innovation capabilities and their combined effects...
Executive innovation
Executive innovation
One recent quote for the role of CEOs and other C-Suite executives on the innovation of a firm is: "Innovation executives are not expected to be the innovators, but the great ones ...
Adult Third Culture Kids
Adult Third Culture Kids
Leaders of multinational organizations require a global mindset due to an increasingly global society that necessitates them to conduct business cross-culturally and virtually (Bee...

Back to Top