Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Obstruction of Justice in Corruption Cases
View through CrossRef
The purpose of this article is to analyze the investigation authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) on the counteraction case of corruption justice process. The reason for the writing is the existence of different interpretation of the authority of the KPK Investigator to conduct an investigation on the counteraction case of justice process in Article 21 of Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Law junto Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of the Corruption (the Law of Corruption Act). The analysis method of the problem formulation applies Grammatical Interpretation, Systematic Interpretation, and Teleological Interpretation. The legislation analyzed, besides the Anti-Corruption Law, is the Decree of the People’s Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia Number XI / MPR / 1998 concerning State Administrators that are clean and free of corruption, collusion, and nepotism; also Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission junto Law Number 10 of 2015 concerning the Establishment of Government Regulations in lieu of Law Number 1 of 2015 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. The conclusion of this article is that the KPK Investigator is not authorized to conduct an investigation on the counteraction case of corruption justice process.
Title: Obstruction of Justice in Corruption Cases
Description:
The purpose of this article is to analyze the investigation authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) on the counteraction case of corruption justice process.
The reason for the writing is the existence of different interpretation of the authority of the KPK Investigator to conduct an investigation on the counteraction case of justice process in Article 21 of Law No.
31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Law junto Law No.
20 of 2001 concerning Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of the Corruption (the Law of Corruption Act).
The analysis method of the problem formulation applies Grammatical Interpretation, Systematic Interpretation, and Teleological Interpretation.
The legislation analyzed, besides the Anti-Corruption Law, is the Decree of the People’s Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia Number XI / MPR / 1998 concerning State Administrators that are clean and free of corruption, collusion, and nepotism; also Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission junto Law Number 10 of 2015 concerning the Establishment of Government Regulations in lieu of Law Number 1 of 2015 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission.
The conclusion of this article is that the KPK Investigator is not authorized to conduct an investigation on the counteraction case of corruption justice process.
Related Results
ON THE METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE CORRUPTION POTENTIAL OF LEGAL ACTS
ON THE METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE CORRUPTION POTENTIAL OF LEGAL ACTS
The article is devoted to the methodology for assessing legal acts for corruption, since the sphere where corruption originates and spreads, respectively, is legislation.
Corrupti...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Corruption understandings
Corruption understandings
This dissertation examines the evolving conceptualizations of corruption in Indonesia during the late colonial period (1902–1942), focusing on how Indonesians debated and defined c...
The concept of corruption risks
The concept of corruption risks
There are valid ratified international instruments at the global level in Ukraine, namely the Criminal Convention for the Suppression of Corruption, and the United Nations Conventi...
Obligation to Combat Corruption as Erga Omnes Obligation in Customary International Law and Jus Cogens
Obligation to Combat Corruption as Erga Omnes Obligation in Customary International Law and Jus Cogens
Obligation to Combat Corruption as Erga Omnes Obligation in Customary International Law and Jus Cogens
In the era of globalization, international trade and cooperation, t...
Integration of the gender approach to the corruption prevention system
Integration of the gender approach to the corruption prevention system
It is an indisputable fact that corruption is one of the most global problems, which makes impossible and slows down the effective development of society and threatens its stabilit...
Anti-corruption policy in Ukraine – ways of improvement and current state
Anti-corruption policy in Ukraine – ways of improvement and current state
The article contains a study of the current state of the fight against corruption in Ukraine, the reasons for the adoption of the new Anti-Corruption Strategy 2014-2017, its purpos...
Penguatan Sikap Anti Korupsi Pada Guru Dan Siswa Di SMP Islam Terpadu Bina Amal Gunungpati Semarang
Penguatan Sikap Anti Korupsi Pada Guru Dan Siswa Di SMP Islam Terpadu Bina Amal Gunungpati Semarang
The problem of corruption in Indonesia has become a public conversation, both through the news, electronic media and social media. This is related to corruption cases and corrupt b...

