Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Codesign of a digital health tool for suicide prevention: protocol for a scoping review
View through CrossRef
Introduction
The role of digital health in providing psychological treatment and support for the prevention of suicide is well documented. Particular emphasis has been placed on digital health technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Providing psychological support reduces the burden of mental health conditions. The challenge is to provide support in the context of patient isolation, which highlights the role of digital technology (video conferencing, smartphone apps and social media). There is, however, a dearth of literature where experts by experience have been involved in the end-to-end process of developing digital health tools for suicide prevention.
Methods and analysis
This study aims to codesign a digital health tool for suicide prevention focusing on the enablers and barriers. The scoping review protocol is phase I within a three-phase study. The protocol will inform the second phase of the study which is the scoping review. The results of the review will inform a funding application to National Institute for Health and Care Research to codesign a digital health tool for suicide prevention (the third phase). The search strategy will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual for Scoping Reviews and incorporates the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist to ensure reporting standards are maintained. The methodology will be supplemented by frameworks by Arksey and O’Malley and Levac
et al
. The search strategy dates for screening are from November 2022 to March 2023. Five databases will be searched: Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Grey literature searches include government and non-government health websites, Google and Google Scholar. The data will be extracted and organised into relevant categories. The results will be synthesised into themes and inform phase II of the study.
Ethics and dissemination
Ethics granted by the University of Bradford on 15 August 2022, reference E995. The project team will design a digital health tool, results will be published in a peer-review journal and disseminated through conferences.
Study registration number
Safety (Mental Health) Innovation Challenge Fund 2022–2023 Protocol RM0223/42079 Ver 0.1.
Title: Codesign of a digital health tool for suicide prevention: protocol for a scoping review
Description:
Introduction
The role of digital health in providing psychological treatment and support for the prevention of suicide is well documented.
Particular emphasis has been placed on digital health technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Providing psychological support reduces the burden of mental health conditions.
The challenge is to provide support in the context of patient isolation, which highlights the role of digital technology (video conferencing, smartphone apps and social media).
There is, however, a dearth of literature where experts by experience have been involved in the end-to-end process of developing digital health tools for suicide prevention.
Methods and analysis
This study aims to codesign a digital health tool for suicide prevention focusing on the enablers and barriers.
The scoping review protocol is phase I within a three-phase study.
The protocol will inform the second phase of the study which is the scoping review.
The results of the review will inform a funding application to National Institute for Health and Care Research to codesign a digital health tool for suicide prevention (the third phase).
The search strategy will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual for Scoping Reviews and incorporates the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist to ensure reporting standards are maintained.
The methodology will be supplemented by frameworks by Arksey and O’Malley and Levac
et al
.
The search strategy dates for screening are from November 2022 to March 2023.
Five databases will be searched: Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Grey literature searches include government and non-government health websites, Google and Google Scholar.
The data will be extracted and organised into relevant categories.
The results will be synthesised into themes and inform phase II of the study.
Ethics and dissemination
Ethics granted by the University of Bradford on 15 August 2022, reference E995.
The project team will design a digital health tool, results will be published in a peer-review journal and disseminated through conferences.
Study registration number
Safety (Mental Health) Innovation Challenge Fund 2022–2023 Protocol RM0223/42079 Ver 0.
1.
Related Results
Macroeconomic and Social Precursors of Suicide Rates in the Philippines: A Quantitative Analysis (Preprint)
Macroeconomic and Social Precursors of Suicide Rates in the Philippines: A Quantitative Analysis (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Suicide is a complex, serious and multifaceted public health issue that poses significant challenges to societies worldwide. In fact, it represen...
Codesign of digital health tools for suicide prevention: A scoping review
Codesign of digital health tools for suicide prevention: A scoping review
Abstract
The importance of codesigning digital health tools for suicide prevention has gained popularity since 2012. Promoted as cost-effective and innovative, digi...
Po koncu: žalovanje in reintegracija bližnjih po samomoru
Po koncu: žalovanje in reintegracija bližnjih po samomoru
Suicide is one of the biggest social and public health problems. Every year about 450 Slovenians and about 800,000 people around the world die by suicide. Suicide represents a sign...
Codesign of Digital Health Tools for Suicide Prevention: A Scoping Review
Codesign of Digital Health Tools for Suicide Prevention: A Scoping Review
The importance of codesigning digital health tools for suicide prevention has gained popularity since 2012. Promoted as cost-effective and innovative, digital health tools are wide...
Mental Health and Suicide Decriminalization: Connecting the Dots
Mental Health and Suicide Decriminalization: Connecting the Dots
Suicide is a current public health crisis as every year, more than 800,000 individuals die by suicide worldwide. According to World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, 77% of thes...
Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction
As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
Trend and gender-based association of the Bangladeshi student suicide during the COVID-19 pandemic: a GIS-based nationwide distribution
Trend and gender-based association of the Bangladeshi student suicide during the COVID-19 pandemic: a GIS-based nationwide distribution
Background:
Students are one of the most vulnerable groups to suicide. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, a Bangladeshi study was conducted assessing their suicide p...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...

