Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Relevance of David B. Resnik's Ethical Principles in Academic Writing and Research for Students

View through CrossRef
This study investigates the application of David B. Resnik's ethical principles—honesty, objectivity, integrity, carefulness, and openness—in academic writing and research among students. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, surveys and student paper analyses were conducted to measure awareness, adherence, and challenges. The results indicate that 95% of students are aware of general ethical principles in academic writing, yet only 70% are familiar with Resnik’s specific framework, leaving 30% unaware of these detailed concepts. Regarding practice, 100% of respondents consistently cited sources correctly, but 66% admitted to paraphrasing without proper attribution, showing gaps between ethical knowledge and application. Challenges identified include maintaining honesty (51%), avoiding plagiarism (29%), ensuring openness (11%), and minimizing bias (9%), often influenced by external pressures and resource limitations. To address these issues, students suggested practical solutions such as workshops, seminars, and digital guides to enhance understanding and compliance with ethical standards. This study emphasizes the importance of ethics education, institutional policy enhancements, and accessible resources to strengthen the implementation of academic integrity, bridging the gap between awareness and consistent ethical practice.
Title: The Relevance of David B. Resnik's Ethical Principles in Academic Writing and Research for Students
Description:
This study investigates the application of David B.
Resnik's ethical principles—honesty, objectivity, integrity, carefulness, and openness—in academic writing and research among students.
Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, surveys and student paper analyses were conducted to measure awareness, adherence, and challenges.
The results indicate that 95% of students are aware of general ethical principles in academic writing, yet only 70% are familiar with Resnik’s specific framework, leaving 30% unaware of these detailed concepts.
Regarding practice, 100% of respondents consistently cited sources correctly, but 66% admitted to paraphrasing without proper attribution, showing gaps between ethical knowledge and application.
Challenges identified include maintaining honesty (51%), avoiding plagiarism (29%), ensuring openness (11%), and minimizing bias (9%), often influenced by external pressures and resource limitations.
To address these issues, students suggested practical solutions such as workshops, seminars, and digital guides to enhance understanding and compliance with ethical standards.
This study emphasizes the importance of ethics education, institutional policy enhancements, and accessible resources to strengthen the implementation of academic integrity, bridging the gap between awareness and consistent ethical practice.

Related Results

Materialism and Environmental Knowledge as a Mediator for Relationships between Religiosity and Ethical Consumption
Materialism and Environmental Knowledge as a Mediator for Relationships between Religiosity and Ethical Consumption
ABSTRACTOn a global and regional scale, Indonesia has one of the least environmentally sustainable economies in the Asia-Pacific region. Consumption is one of the key factors contr...
A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
Teaching and Engaging International Students
Teaching and Engaging International Students
International student mobility has been increasingly subject to turbulences in politics, culture, economics, natural disasters, and public health. The new decade has witnessed an u...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
EFL University Students’ Self-Regulated Writing Strategies: The Role of Individual Differences
EFL University Students’ Self-Regulated Writing Strategies: The Role of Individual Differences
Background. Self-regulated learning strategies play an essential role in the success of students’ learning of writing. The use of these strategies might be influenced by the studen...
A study analyzing the digital writing perception of university students
A study analyzing the digital writing perception of university students
Objectives The purpose of this study was to analyze university students' perception of digital writing by gender and major, and also to analyze the factors that influence these di...

Back to Top