Impact of scatter correction on personalized dosimetry in selective internal radiotherapy using 166Ho-PLLA: a single-center study including Monte-Carlo simulation, phantom and patient imaging

Abstract Background Developments in transarterial radioembolization led to the conception of new microspheres loaded with holmium-166 (166Ho). However, due to the complexity of the scatter components in 166Ho single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), questions about image quality and dosimetry are emerging. The aims of this work are to investigate the scatter components and correction methods to propose a suitable solution, and to evaluate the impact on image quality and dosimetry including Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations, phantom, and patient data. Methods Dual energy window (DEW) and triple energy window (TEW) methods were investigated for scatter correction purposes and compared using Contrast Recovery Coefficients (CRC) and Contrast to Noise Ratios (CNR). First, MC simulations were carried out to assess all the scatter components in the energy windows used, also to confirm the choice of the parameter needed for the DEW method. Then, MC simulations of acquisitions of a Jaszczak phantom were conducted with conditions mimicking an ideal scatter correction. These simulated projections can be reconstructed and compared with real acquisitions corrected by both methods and then reconstructed. Finally, both methods were applied on patient data and their impact on personalized dosimetry was evaluated. Results MC simulations confirmed the use of k = 1 for the DEW method. These simulations also confirmed the complexity of scatter components in the main energy window used with a high energy gamma rays component of about half of the total counts detected, together with a negligible X rays component and a negligible presence of fluorescence. CRC and CNR analyses, realized on simulated scatter-free projections of the phantom and on scatter corrected acquisitions of the same phantom, suggested an increased efficiency of the TEW method, even at the price of higher level of noise. Finally, these methods, applied on patient data, showed significant differences in terms of non-tumoral liver absorbed dose, non-tumoral liver fraction under 50 Gy, tumor absorbed dose, and tumor fraction above 150 Gy. Conclusions This study demonstrated the impact of scatter correction on personalized dosimetry on patient data. The use of a TEW method is proposed for scatter correction in 166Ho SPECT imaging.