Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Brake Burnishing Effect on AEB Performance

View through CrossRef
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) evaluates autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems as part of its front crash prevention (FCP) ratings. To prepare the test vehicles' brakes, each vehicle must have 200 miles on the odometer and be subjected to the abbreviated brake burnish procedure of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 126. Other organizations conducting AEB testing follow the more extensive burnishing procedure described in FMVSS 135; Light Vehicle Brake Systems. This study compares the effects on AEB performance of the two burnishing procedures using seven 2014 model year vehicles.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Six of the vehicles achieved maximum AEB speed reductions after 60 or fewer FMVSS 135 stops. After braking performance stabilized, the Mercedes ML350, BMW 328i, and Volvo S80 showed increased speed reductions compared with stops using brand new brake components. The Acura RLX and Cadillac CTS showed no change in speed reductions, and the speed reductions of the Dodge Durango and Lexus IS 250 worsened.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">After the FMVSS 135 burnishing was complete, AEB runs at 20 and 40 km/h were conducted to compare the results from the original IIHS FCP rating tests. For each of the vehicles, the IIHS FCP rating was not changed by different burnishing procedures.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Results show that AEB speed reductions can improve or degrade as new brakes progress through the FMVSS 135 burnishing cycle. However, the differences in either direction are small and none of the tested vehicles had speed reduction differences that were great enough to change the IIHS FCP ratings.</div></div>
Title: Brake Burnishing Effect on AEB Performance
Description:
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) evaluates autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems as part of its front crash prevention (FCP) ratings.
To prepare the test vehicles' brakes, each vehicle must have 200 miles on the odometer and be subjected to the abbreviated brake burnish procedure of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 126.
Other organizations conducting AEB testing follow the more extensive burnishing procedure described in FMVSS 135; Light Vehicle Brake Systems.
This study compares the effects on AEB performance of the two burnishing procedures using seven 2014 model year vehicles.
</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Six of the vehicles achieved maximum AEB speed reductions after 60 or fewer FMVSS 135 stops.
After braking performance stabilized, the Mercedes ML350, BMW 328i, and Volvo S80 showed increased speed reductions compared with stops using brand new brake components.
The Acura RLX and Cadillac CTS showed no change in speed reductions, and the speed reductions of the Dodge Durango and Lexus IS 250 worsened.
</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">After the FMVSS 135 burnishing was complete, AEB runs at 20 and 40 km/h were conducted to compare the results from the original IIHS FCP rating tests.
For each of the vehicles, the IIHS FCP rating was not changed by different burnishing procedures.
</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Results show that AEB speed reductions can improve or degrade as new brakes progress through the FMVSS 135 burnishing cycle.
However, the differences in either direction are small and none of the tested vehicles had speed reduction differences that were great enough to change the IIHS FCP ratings.
</div></div>.

Related Results

Test Bench Brake Calliper with Maximum Power Range
Test Bench Brake Calliper with Maximum Power Range
RENK Test System is one of the world´s leading providers of customized test systems used in development, production and quality assurance. Based on its many years of experience, RT...
Brake Guidance System for Commercial Vehicles with Coordinated Friction and Engine Brakes
Brake Guidance System for Commercial Vehicles with Coordinated Friction and Engine Brakes
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Using friction brakes for long time can increase easily its temperature and lower vehicle brake performanc...
Empirical Study of the Braking Performance of Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking (P-AEB)
Empirical Study of the Braking Performance of Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking (P-AEB)
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Vehicle manufacturers are beginning to improve existing autonomous emergency braking (AEB) algorithms by a...
Low friction hybrid nanocomposite material for brake pad application
Low friction hybrid nanocomposite material for brake pad application
Despite the huge improvements made in the development of vehicle brake pad materials, problems such long stopping distances, noise pollution, and heat dissipation still continue to...
Redundant Brake Boost Control Strategy of Integrated Electro-hydraulic Braking System
Redundant Brake Boost Control Strategy of Integrated Electro-hydraulic Braking System
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The traditional braking system has been unable to meet the redundant safety requiremen...
Measuring and Characterizing Brake System Performance During Race Track/High Energy Driving Conditions
Measuring and Characterizing Brake System Performance During Race Track/High Energy Driving Conditions
<div class="htmlview paragraph">Recent years have seen an increased emphasis on producing automobiles with a ‘performance’ image, and a corresponding level of performance cap...
Investigation of thermo-structural behavior of disc brake
Investigation of thermo-structural behavior of disc brake
Abstract Over decades, disc brakes have gained popularity and have been progressively used across many vehicle types, from light motorbikes to huge road trucks and trains. ...

Back to Top