Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Tenure Rights and Benefit Sharing Arrangements for REDD: A Case Study of Two REDD Pilot Projects in Cambodia
View through CrossRef
Deforestation and forest degradation account for up to 20% of the total annual anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, current approaches to address climate change include strategies to reduce deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD). Even though REDD is still under discussion within the UNFCCC framework, many REDD pilot projects are being implemented across the tropics. Securing local communities’ tenure rights and their equitable access to forest conservation benefits are critical in REDD because local communities could be excluded from REDD benefits if their land and forest access rights are not adequately addressed. In Cambodia, two REDD pilot projects: Community Forestry Carbon Offset Project (CFCOP) in Oddar Meanchey province and the Seima Protection Forest Project (SPF) in Mundulkiri province, are being implemented. This study aims to to contribute to the development of an effective REDD mechanism in Cambodia by examining land and forest tenures and benefit sharing arrangements under the two REDD pilot projects in Cambodia. The paper employs concepts of discourse coalitions and rules of the game to explain tenure rights and benefit sharing arrangements in the two projects. The study is based on literature review, analysis of key text documents and interviews with 19 respondents from government, civil society, donor community, community and private sector involved in the two REDD pilot projects and from outside. Results show that all forestlands in Cambodia belong to the state and various forest tenure regimes exit in Cambodia. These forest regimes include forest concessions, community forests, protection forests, protected areas, private forests and economic land concessions. Currently, the two REDD pilot projects are being implemented in community forests and protection forests. In both projects, local communities are granted forest access rights. In addition, the projects have legitimized tenure rights of local communities in the project areas as provided for through the Land and Forestry Law in Cambodia. The study also indicates that revenues from carbon credits generated by the projects will be shared with the local communities. According to the Government Decision No.699, more than 50% of net revenues will be channeled to local communities in the CFCOP while the sharing of the revenues in the SPF is still under consideration. The study offers lessons that could guide other REDD projects in securing local communities’ forest access rights and their rights to benefits from forest conservation.
Title: Tenure Rights and Benefit Sharing Arrangements for REDD: A Case Study of Two REDD Pilot Projects in Cambodia
Description:
Deforestation and forest degradation account for up to 20% of the total annual anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions.
As a result, current approaches to address climate change include strategies to reduce deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD).
Even though REDD is still under discussion within the UNFCCC framework, many REDD pilot projects are being implemented across the tropics.
Securing local communities’ tenure rights and their equitable access to forest conservation benefits are critical in REDD because local communities could be excluded from REDD benefits if their land and forest access rights are not adequately addressed.
In Cambodia, two REDD pilot projects: Community Forestry Carbon Offset Project (CFCOP) in Oddar Meanchey province and the Seima Protection Forest Project (SPF) in Mundulkiri province, are being implemented.
This study aims to to contribute to the development of an effective REDD mechanism in Cambodia by examining land and forest tenures and benefit sharing arrangements under the two REDD pilot projects in Cambodia.
The paper employs concepts of discourse coalitions and rules of the game to explain tenure rights and benefit sharing arrangements in the two projects.
The study is based on literature review, analysis of key text documents and interviews with 19 respondents from government, civil society, donor community, community and private sector involved in the two REDD pilot projects and from outside.
Results show that all forestlands in Cambodia belong to the state and various forest tenure regimes exit in Cambodia.
These forest regimes include forest concessions, community forests, protection forests, protected areas, private forests and economic land concessions.
Currently, the two REDD pilot projects are being implemented in community forests and protection forests.
In both projects, local communities are granted forest access rights.
In addition, the projects have legitimized tenure rights of local communities in the project areas as provided for through the Land and Forestry Law in Cambodia.
The study also indicates that revenues from carbon credits generated by the projects will be shared with the local communities.
According to the Government Decision No.
699, more than 50% of net revenues will be channeled to local communities in the CFCOP while the sharing of the revenues in the SPF is still under consideration.
The study offers lessons that could guide other REDD projects in securing local communities’ forest access rights and their rights to benefits from forest conservation.
Related Results
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Challenges and lessons learned for REDD+ finance and its governance
Challenges and lessons learned for REDD+ finance and its governance
Abstract
Discussion on reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries began at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) C...
Environmental Democracy and Forest Carbon (REDD+)
Environmental Democracy and Forest Carbon (REDD+)
Public funders and private investors are pouring billions of dollars into Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) in the developing world. In R...
Redd+ Safeguards in Indonesia
Redd+ Safeguards in Indonesia
Since REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) covers the core issues of Indonesian forestry, such as conservation, halting deforestation, and providing...
Who Owns REDD+? Carbon Markets, Carbon Rights and Entitlements to REDD+ Finance
Who Owns REDD+? Carbon Markets, Carbon Rights and Entitlements to REDD+ Finance
The question of who is entitled to benefit from transactions under the United Nations framework to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) remains one of...
REDD+ organisational arrangements and potential for sectoral integration: Evidence from Cameroon
REDD+ organisational arrangements and potential for sectoral integration: Evidence from Cameroon
AbstractThe organisational arrangements of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanism have been scrutinised for their capacity to support em...
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
The European “refugee crisis” of today may lead to tomorrow’s integration difficulties. The large-scale influx of refugees has brought and is bringing many who, unless the situatio...
Laboratory Model Study of Single Five-Spot and Single Injection Well Pilot Waterflooding
Laboratory Model Study of Single Five-Spot and Single Injection Well Pilot Waterflooding
Abstract
Many full-scale waterflooding operations are preceded by pilot floods, one purpose of which is to provide an estimate of recoverable oil. A laboratory mo...

