Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Pharmacokinetic Study of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Combined with Rifampin in Healthy Volunteers

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF) was studied in combination with rifampin in 24 healthy subjects in a multiple-dose, open-label, single-group, two-period study. All subjects were given tenofovir DF at 300 mg once a day (QD) from days 1 to 10 (period 1). From days 11 to 20 the subjects received tenofovir DF at 300 mg combined with rifampin at 600 mg QD (period 2). The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of tenofovir (day 10 and 20) and rifampin (day 20) were assessed. The drug-related adverse events (AEs) experienced during this study were mostly mild. Only one grade 3 AE possibly or probably related to the treatment (raised liver enzyme levels) occurred during period 2; the subject was withdrawn from the study. Pharmacokinetic data for 23 subjects were thus evaluable. Point estimates for the mean ratios of tenofovir with rifampin versus tenofovir alone for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC 0-24 ), the maximum concentration of drug in plasma ( C max ), and the minimum concentration of drug in plasma ( C min ) were 0.88, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively. The 90% classical confidence intervals for AUC 0-24 , C max , and C min were 0.84 to 0.92, 0.78 to 0.90, and 0.80 to 0.91, respectively, thus suggesting pharmacokinetic equivalence. Similarly, coadministration of rifampin and tenofovir DF did not result in changes in the values of the tenofovir pharmacokinetic parameters. For rifampin, the values of the pharmacokinetic parameters found in this study were comparable to those found in the literature, indicating that tenofovir DF has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of rifampin. In conclusion, adaptation of either the rifampin or the tenofovir DF dose for the simultaneous treatment of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in HIV-infected patients is probably not required.
Title: Pharmacokinetic Study of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Combined with Rifampin in Healthy Volunteers
Description:
ABSTRACT Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF) was studied in combination with rifampin in 24 healthy subjects in a multiple-dose, open-label, single-group, two-period study.
All subjects were given tenofovir DF at 300 mg once a day (QD) from days 1 to 10 (period 1).
From days 11 to 20 the subjects received tenofovir DF at 300 mg combined with rifampin at 600 mg QD (period 2).
The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of tenofovir (day 10 and 20) and rifampin (day 20) were assessed.
The drug-related adverse events (AEs) experienced during this study were mostly mild.
Only one grade 3 AE possibly or probably related to the treatment (raised liver enzyme levels) occurred during period 2; the subject was withdrawn from the study.
Pharmacokinetic data for 23 subjects were thus evaluable.
Point estimates for the mean ratios of tenofovir with rifampin versus tenofovir alone for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC 0-24 ), the maximum concentration of drug in plasma ( C max ), and the minimum concentration of drug in plasma ( C min ) were 0.
88, 0.
84, and 0.
85, respectively.
The 90% classical confidence intervals for AUC 0-24 , C max , and C min were 0.
84 to 0.
92, 0.
78 to 0.
90, and 0.
80 to 0.
91, respectively, thus suggesting pharmacokinetic equivalence.
Similarly, coadministration of rifampin and tenofovir DF did not result in changes in the values of the tenofovir pharmacokinetic parameters.
For rifampin, the values of the pharmacokinetic parameters found in this study were comparable to those found in the literature, indicating that tenofovir DF has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of rifampin.
In conclusion, adaptation of either the rifampin or the tenofovir DF dose for the simultaneous treatment of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in HIV-infected patients is probably not required.

Related Results

Real-Life Impact on Lipid Profile of a Switch from Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-Infected Patients
Real-Life Impact on Lipid Profile of a Switch from Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-Infected Patients
Background: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is a prodrug of tenofovir diphosphate that exposes patients to renal toxicity over the long term. Tenofovir alafenamide, a new prodrug, no...
Pharmacokinetic interaction between TMC114/ritonavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy volunteers
Pharmacokinetic interaction between TMC114/ritonavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy volunteers
What is already known about this subject • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and some of the HIV protease inhibitors show drug–drug interactions that cannot be predicted based on their...
Switchover to Tenofovir Disoproxil in Chronic HBV Patients with Primary Treatment Failure to Entecavir
Switchover to Tenofovir Disoproxil in Chronic HBV Patients with Primary Treatment Failure to Entecavir
Background/Aim: Primary treatment failure to entecavir is known to occur in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Although the prevalence is low, the optimal management of thi...
Tenofovir Overdosage-A Rarely Reported Phenomenon in Literature
Tenofovir Overdosage-A Rarely Reported Phenomenon in Literature
Introduction: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) has infected affected thirty three percent of the world population, two billion have been infected worldwide and out of them, 350 million suff...

Back to Top