Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Revitalizing Revision Surgery: A Novel Technique for Broken Screw Extraction and Replacement in Lumbar Spine Fixation

View through CrossRef
Abstract Transpedicular instrumentation is a cornerstone of spine surgery because of the vertebral pedicle's superior anatomical and biomechanical properties, which enable short-segment, three-dimensional stabilization. However, implant failure occurs in 3 to 7% of cases, with about 25% attributed to screw breakage. Removing broken fragments without compromising pedicle integrity remains technically challenging, and many existing techniques require bone removal that weakens subsequent fixation. Reported complications include fragment retrieval failure, nerve root injury, and dural tears. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel technique for extracting broken lumbar pedicle screws while preserving pedicle integrity and enabling successful reinstrumentation, and to assess associated clinical and radiological outcomes. We conducted a retrospective series of 20 patients with radiologically confirmed broken lumbar pedicle screws at Menoufia University Hospitals after informed consent and Institutional Review Board approval. Patients were followed up after 6 months of the revision to assess clinical and radiological outcomes. Data were tabulated and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2019 and SPSS, version 25. All patients underwent revision of previous lumbar fixation using the novel extraction technique. The mean age of the patients was 49.4 ± 8.7 years. Mean visual analog scale improved from 7.05 ± 1.36 preoperatively to 2.4 ± 0.68 postoperatively. Successful extraction of broken pedicle screws and reinstrumentation was achieved in all cases, with no intraoperative complications. At 6-month follow-up, all patients demonstrated clinical improvement and stable radiological fusion, without implant failure. Management of broken pedicle screws is challenging, especially when pedicle preservation is required. Our technique enables safe extraction of deeply seated fragments while preserving pedicle integrity and original trajectory, facilitating a larger screw reinsertion.
Title: Revitalizing Revision Surgery: A Novel Technique for Broken Screw Extraction and Replacement in Lumbar Spine Fixation
Description:
Abstract Transpedicular instrumentation is a cornerstone of spine surgery because of the vertebral pedicle's superior anatomical and biomechanical properties, which enable short-segment, three-dimensional stabilization.
However, implant failure occurs in 3 to 7% of cases, with about 25% attributed to screw breakage.
Removing broken fragments without compromising pedicle integrity remains technically challenging, and many existing techniques require bone removal that weakens subsequent fixation.
Reported complications include fragment retrieval failure, nerve root injury, and dural tears.
We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel technique for extracting broken lumbar pedicle screws while preserving pedicle integrity and enabling successful reinstrumentation, and to assess associated clinical and radiological outcomes.
We conducted a retrospective series of 20 patients with radiologically confirmed broken lumbar pedicle screws at Menoufia University Hospitals after informed consent and Institutional Review Board approval.
Patients were followed up after 6 months of the revision to assess clinical and radiological outcomes.
Data were tabulated and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2019 and SPSS, version 25.
All patients underwent revision of previous lumbar fixation using the novel extraction technique.
The mean age of the patients was 49.
4 ± 8.
7 years.
Mean visual analog scale improved from 7.
05 ± 1.
36 preoperatively to 2.
4 ± 0.
68 postoperatively.
Successful extraction of broken pedicle screws and reinstrumentation was achieved in all cases, with no intraoperative complications.
At 6-month follow-up, all patients demonstrated clinical improvement and stable radiological fusion, without implant failure.
Management of broken pedicle screws is challenging, especially when pedicle preservation is required.
Our technique enables safe extraction of deeply seated fragments while preserving pedicle integrity and original trajectory, facilitating a larger screw reinsertion.

Related Results

Revision Ankle Syndesmosis Fixation: Functional Outcome after TightRope® Fixation
Revision Ankle Syndesmosis Fixation: Functional Outcome after TightRope® Fixation
ABSTRACT Introduction Syndesmotic injuries present a challenge to orthopedic surgeons. Malreduction of the syndesmosis has been reported to cause instability and secondary osteoar...
Screw versus staple fixation for Akin osteotomy
Screw versus staple fixation for Akin osteotomy
Introduction Akin osteotomies are commonly fixed with a screw or staple. Hardware-related symptoms are not uncommon. We compared the outcomes and costs of the two implants. Methods...
CT Imaging Anatomical Study of Percutaneous Magic Screw Fixation for Acetabular Posterior Column Fracture
CT Imaging Anatomical Study of Percutaneous Magic Screw Fixation for Acetabular Posterior Column Fracture
Abstract Background: Research into minimally-invasive fixation of acetabular posterior column fracture has mostly focused on anatomic measurement through the ischial tubero...
Lumbar Spine Distraction Exercise—Surprisingly Innovation in Conservative Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disorder
Lumbar Spine Distraction Exercise—Surprisingly Innovation in Conservative Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disorder
Introduction It is not possible to prevent the progression of degenerative disc disease of lumbar spine. Conservative treatment offered today help minimize the ...
Comparison of posterior open screw fixation with percutaneous fixation among traumatic thoracolumbar fracture patients.
Comparison of posterior open screw fixation with percutaneous fixation among traumatic thoracolumbar fracture patients.
Objectives: To compare outcome and adverse events of open posterior pedicle screw fixation with percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation among patients suffering traumatic tho...
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Background Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common causes of low back and leg pain. Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration leads to the decrease of intervertebral height, the ...

Back to Top