Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Who becomes a sperm donor: personality characteristics in a national sample of identifiable donors

View through CrossRef
Please cite this paper as:Sydsjö G, Lampic C, Brändström S, Gudmundsson J, Karlström P, Solensten N, Thurin‐Kjellberg A, Skoog Svanberg A. Who becomes a sperm donor: personality characteristics in a national sample of identifiable donors. BJOG 2012;119:33–39.Objective To study the personality characteristics of identifiable sperm donors in a national sample in comparison with the same characteristics of a control group.Design Descriptive study.Setting All clinics (n = 7) performing gamete donation in Sweden.Population All Swedish sperm donors recruited during 2005–08. An age‐matched group of Swedish men served as controls.Methods Standardised questionnaires were used to measure personality.Main outcome measures Demographics and the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI).Results The mean age of the donors was 33.8 ± 7.8 years (18–56 years). About one‐third (36.5%) of the donors had biological children of their own. With regard to personality, significant differences were present on harm avoidance, with lower means for sperm donors (P = 0.002, 95% CI −3.74 to −0.85), and on self‐directedness and cooperativeness, with higher means for donors (P = 0.002, 95% CI 0.97–4.19;P = 0.001; 95% CI 0.75–2.95, respectively), compared with controls. This indicates that the donors in general feel less worried and suffer less from uncertainty, shyness and fatigability than controls. They also perceive themselves as being autonomous, with a capacity to take responsibility, to behave in a goal‐directed manner, to be resourceful and self‐acceptant, and to behave in a manner guided by meaningful values and goals. Furthermore, they describe themselves as being well integrated in humanity or society, and having a good capacity for identification with and acceptance of other people.Conclusions The screening process at the clinics seems to generate a group of stable, mature and well‐integrated donors, and this is a promising result for the future.
Title: Who becomes a sperm donor: personality characteristics in a national sample of identifiable donors
Description:
Please cite this paper as:Sydsjö G, Lampic C, Brändström S, Gudmundsson J, Karlström P, Solensten N, Thurin‐Kjellberg A, Skoog Svanberg A.
Who becomes a sperm donor: personality characteristics in a national sample of identifiable donors.
BJOG 2012;119:33–39.
Objective To study the personality characteristics of identifiable sperm donors in a national sample in comparison with the same characteristics of a control group.
Design Descriptive study.
Setting All clinics (n = 7) performing gamete donation in Sweden.
Population All Swedish sperm donors recruited during 2005–08.
An age‐matched group of Swedish men served as controls.
Methods Standardised questionnaires were used to measure personality.
Main outcome measures Demographics and the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI).
Results The mean age of the donors was 33.
8 ± 7.
8 years (18–56 years).
About one‐third (36.
5%) of the donors had biological children of their own.
With regard to personality, significant differences were present on harm avoidance, with lower means for sperm donors (P = 0.
002, 95% CI −3.
74 to −0.
85), and on self‐directedness and cooperativeness, with higher means for donors (P = 0.
002, 95% CI 0.
97–4.
19;P = 0.
001; 95% CI 0.
75–2.
95, respectively), compared with controls.
This indicates that the donors in general feel less worried and suffer less from uncertainty, shyness and fatigability than controls.
They also perceive themselves as being autonomous, with a capacity to take responsibility, to behave in a goal‐directed manner, to be resourceful and self‐acceptant, and to behave in a manner guided by meaningful values and goals.
Furthermore, they describe themselves as being well integrated in humanity or society, and having a good capacity for identification with and acceptance of other people.
Conclusions The screening process at the clinics seems to generate a group of stable, mature and well‐integrated donors, and this is a promising result for the future.

Related Results

Follow-up of 12,559 Unrelated Donors of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells or Bone Marrow
Follow-up of 12,559 Unrelated Donors of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells or Bone Marrow
Abstract Abstract 365 Donor follow-up is indicated to detect potential long-term risks for allogeneic stem cell donors. We sent a follow-up questionna...
Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor
Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor
Abstract STUDY QUESTION What interests and experiences do donor-conceived adults have with respect to same-donor peers/siblings,...
Perspectives on sperm donor anonymity: insights from donor-conceived adults in Belgium
Perspectives on sperm donor anonymity: insights from donor-conceived adults in Belgium
Abstract STUDY QUESTION Are donor-conceived adults in Belgium interested in obtaining donor information, and do these interests ...
MO927IMPACT OF DONOR AGE ON LIVING DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
MO927IMPACT OF DONOR AGE ON LIVING DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
Abstract Background and Aims Although elderly living donors are recognized as a marginal donor for kidney transplantation, the n...

Back to Top