Transcriptional Changes Before and After Forgetting of a Long-Term Sensitization Memory in Aplysia californica

This is a pre-print of a paper now published in Neurobiology of Learning and Memory: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2018.09.007 Most long-term memories are forgotten, becoming progressively less likely to be recalled. Still, some memory fragments may persist beyond forgetting, as savings memory (easier relearning) can persist long after recall has become impossible. What happens to a memory trace during forgetting that makes it inaccessible for recall and yet still effective to spark easier re-learning? We are addressing this question by tracking the transcriptional changes that accompany learning and then forgetting of a long-term sensitization memory in the tail-elicited siphon withdrawal reflex of Aplysia californica. First, we tracked savings memory. We found that even though recall of sensitization fades completely within 1 week of training, savings memory is still robustly expressed at 2 weeks post training. Next, we tracked the time-course of regulation of 11 transcripts we previously identified as potentially being regulated beyond the decay of recall. Remarkably, 3 transcripts still show strong regulation of expression 2 weeks after training and an additional 4 are regulated for at least 1 week. These long-lasting changes in gene expression always began early in the memory process, within 1 day of training. We present a synthesis of our results tracking gene expression changes accompanying sensitization and provide a testable model of how sensitization memory is forgotten.