Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Soft tissue grafting for the prevention and management of peri‐implantitis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Aim
To critically summarize the current evidence on the role of the peri‐implant soft tissue phenotype [specifically the width of keratinized peri‐implant mucosa (KPIM) and the soft tissue thickness (STT)] and of the soft tissue grafting procedures used for the prevention and management of peri‐implant diseases.
Materials and Methods
A narrative review of the literature was conducted, using PubMed for articles published up to December 2025, complemented by manual searching of reference lists. All different study designs were considered, prioritizing the highest available level of evidence.
Results
Peri‐implant diseases are multifactorial biofilm‐induced chronic inflammatory conditions. Their onset, progression, and response to treatment are influenced by the characteristics of the peri‐implant soft tissues, which, unlike periodontal tissues, form a weaker biological seal, rendering them more susceptible to inflammation‐driven tissue breakdown. A reduced width of KPIM is consistently associated with higher plaque accumulation, mucosal inflammation, discomfort during oral hygiene, and a greater prevalence of peri‐implant diseases. It should be emphasized, however, that most of this evidence derives from cross‐sectional and observational studies. KPIM augmentation procedures improve peri‐implant soft tissue health and patient‐reported outcomes, and STT augmentation by increasing mucosal thickness (MT) may enhance soft‐tissue margin stability and reduce marginal bone loss. These benefits are best supported for surrogate outcomes, whereas the independent effect of soft tissue augmentation (STA) on the prevention of peri‐implantitis remains less certain. In the treatment of peri‐implantitis, there is some evidence that simultaneous or staged STA (particularly KPIM reconstruction) may improve clinical stability; however, its effect on disease resolution remains unclear, as most available studies lack a negative control group.
Conclusions
Soft tissue grafting is a clinically relevant, phenotype‐modifying strategy for preventing and managing peri‐implant diseases. Risk‐based, phenotype‐driven decision‐making (distinguishing KPIM augmentation from targeted STT augmentation) is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes.
Title: Soft tissue grafting for the prevention and management of peri‐implantitis
Description:
Abstract
Aim
To critically summarize the current evidence on the role of the peri‐implant soft tissue phenotype [specifically the width of keratinized peri‐implant mucosa (KPIM) and the soft tissue thickness (STT)] and of the soft tissue grafting procedures used for the prevention and management of peri‐implant diseases.
Materials and Methods
A narrative review of the literature was conducted, using PubMed for articles published up to December 2025, complemented by manual searching of reference lists.
All different study designs were considered, prioritizing the highest available level of evidence.
Results
Peri‐implant diseases are multifactorial biofilm‐induced chronic inflammatory conditions.
Their onset, progression, and response to treatment are influenced by the characteristics of the peri‐implant soft tissues, which, unlike periodontal tissues, form a weaker biological seal, rendering them more susceptible to inflammation‐driven tissue breakdown.
A reduced width of KPIM is consistently associated with higher plaque accumulation, mucosal inflammation, discomfort during oral hygiene, and a greater prevalence of peri‐implant diseases.
It should be emphasized, however, that most of this evidence derives from cross‐sectional and observational studies.
KPIM augmentation procedures improve peri‐implant soft tissue health and patient‐reported outcomes, and STT augmentation by increasing mucosal thickness (MT) may enhance soft‐tissue margin stability and reduce marginal bone loss.
These benefits are best supported for surrogate outcomes, whereas the independent effect of soft tissue augmentation (STA) on the prevention of peri‐implantitis remains less certain.
In the treatment of peri‐implantitis, there is some evidence that simultaneous or staged STA (particularly KPIM reconstruction) may improve clinical stability; however, its effect on disease resolution remains unclear, as most available studies lack a negative control group.
Conclusions
Soft tissue grafting is a clinically relevant, phenotype‐modifying strategy for preventing and managing peri‐implant diseases.
Risk‐based, phenotype‐driven decision‐making (distinguishing KPIM augmentation from targeted STT augmentation) is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes.
Related Results
Peri-implantitis: risk factors and outcome of reconstructive therapy
Peri-implantitis: risk factors and outcome of reconstructive therapy
This thesis is focused on (I) the outcome of reconstructive treatment of peri-implant defects and (II) risk factors for the development of peri-implantitis. Background An increas...
Development of an immunogenomic landscape for the competing endogenous RNAs network of peri-implantitis
Development of an immunogenomic landscape for the competing endogenous RNAs network of peri-implantitis
Abstract
Background: Peri-implantitis is an inflammation that occurs around the implant, resulting in varying degrees of inflammatory damage to the soft and hard tissues. T...
Titanium release in peri‐implantitis
Titanium release in peri‐implantitis
SummaryObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the titanium (Ti) content of biopsies from patients with severe peri‐implantitis or controls without Ti exposure.Backgroun...
Soft tissue features of peri‐implant diseases and related treatment
Soft tissue features of peri‐implant diseases and related treatment
AbstractBackgroundThe need for soft tissue grafting at implant sites for preventing and treating peri‐implant diseases is a currently investigated and debated topic.PurposeThe aim ...
Peri-implantitis and Severity Level
Peri-implantitis and Severity Level
Abstract
Objectives Different diagnostic criteria were used for diagnosis of peri-implant diseases. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore prevalence of peri-implant ...
Comprehensive microbiological findings in peri‐implantitis and periodontitis
Comprehensive microbiological findings in peri‐implantitis and periodontitis
AbstractAimThe microbial differences between peri‐implantitis and periodontitis in the same subjects were examined using 16S rRNA gene clone library analysis and real‐time polymera...
Integrative microbiome- and metatranscriptome-based analyses reveal diagnostic biomarkers for peri-implantitis
Integrative microbiome- and metatranscriptome-based analyses reveal diagnostic biomarkers for peri-implantitis
Abstract
Peri-implantitis is a severe biofilm-associated infection of the tissues around dental implants that increases the risk of implant failu...
Subgingival microbiome in patients with healthy and ailing dental implants
Subgingival microbiome in patients with healthy and ailing dental implants
AbstractDental implants are commonly used to replace missing teeth. However, the dysbiotic polymicrobial communities of peri-implant sites are responsible for peri-implant diseases...

