Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

e0536 Comparative effects of percutaneous coronary intervention for culprit coronary artery or together with non-culprit coronary artery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease

View through CrossRef
Background Rapid recanalisation of the culprit lesion is the main goal of primary angioplasty for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but strategy for treatment of culprit and non-culprit lesions in multi-vessel coronary artery disease remains unclear. Objectives Aims to examine the 6-month outcomes for non-culprit interventions performed at the time of the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Methods A total of 1120 patients treated with primary angioplasty between 2008 and 2009 were classified in groups of patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVD). We examined the associated 6 month outcomes following non-culprit interventions performed at the time of primary PCI. Patients were subdivided in two groups on the basis of the revascularization strategy: 1) patients undergoing PCI of the culprit coronary artery only; 2) patients undergoing PCI of both the culprit coronary artery and non-culprit coronary artery during the initial procedure. All the patients were followed up for 6-month for major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Results The two groups did not differ with respect to baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. At 6-month, compared with PCI restricted to the culprit coronary artery only, multivessel PCI was associated with higher rates of re-infarction (7.9% vs 2.6%, p<0.001), revascularization (14.5% vs 6.8%, p<0.001), and MACEs (26.7% vs 14.8%, p<0.001). Conclusions Non-culprit coronary interventions were significantly associated with increased mortality. Our data suggest that in patients with MVD, primary PCI should be directed at the culprit coronary artery only, with decisions about PCI of non-culprit lesions guided by objective evidence of residual ischaemia at late follow-up. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Title: e0536 Comparative effects of percutaneous coronary intervention for culprit coronary artery or together with non-culprit coronary artery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease
Description:
Background Rapid recanalisation of the culprit lesion is the main goal of primary angioplasty for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but strategy for treatment of culprit and non-culprit lesions in multi-vessel coronary artery disease remains unclear.
Objectives Aims to examine the 6-month outcomes for non-culprit interventions performed at the time of the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in multi-vessel coronary artery disease.
Methods A total of 1120 patients treated with primary angioplasty between 2008 and 2009 were classified in groups of patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVD).
We examined the associated 6 month outcomes following non-culprit interventions performed at the time of primary PCI.
Patients were subdivided in two groups on the basis of the revascularization strategy: 1) patients undergoing PCI of the culprit coronary artery only; 2) patients undergoing PCI of both the culprit coronary artery and non-culprit coronary artery during the initial procedure.
All the patients were followed up for 6-month for major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Results The two groups did not differ with respect to baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics.
At 6-month, compared with PCI restricted to the culprit coronary artery only, multivessel PCI was associated with higher rates of re-infarction (7.
9% vs 2.
6%, p<0.
001), revascularization (14.
5% vs 6.
8%, p<0.
001), and MACEs (26.
7% vs 14.
8%, p<0.
001).
Conclusions Non-culprit coronary interventions were significantly associated with increased mortality.
Our data suggest that in patients with MVD, primary PCI should be directed at the culprit coronary artery only, with decisions about PCI of non-culprit lesions guided by objective evidence of residual ischaemia at late follow-up.
Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Related Results

Early Onset of Coronary Subclavian Steal Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Early Onset of Coronary Subclavian Steal Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Coronary subclavian steal syndrome (CSSS) is a rare phenomenon that often goes undiagnosed and causes severe complications, including death. This report prese...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Some way over expanding the plaque volume up high, there is a risk on myocardial salvage
Some way over expanding the plaque volume up high, there is a risk on myocardial salvage
Abstract Background Slow flow phenomenon is impaired coronary flow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in abs...
A study on risk factors of coronary artery disease in Chong Qing city
A study on risk factors of coronary artery disease in Chong Qing city
Objective To investigate the relationship between risk factors and coronary artery disease in Chong Qing city, and to provide scientific basis for preventing and ...

Back to Top