Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluation System of Patent Criteria in European Union Law

View through CrossRef
Field and Aims: An invention is the result of the inventor's intellectual effort, which is created in the form of an industrial product or industrial process. The person who makes the invention has the right to patent that invention. According to paragraph 1 of Article 60 of the European Patent Convention, the patent belongs to the inventor or his representative. According to the European patent convention, for an invention to be eligible for a patent, it must meet the necessary conditions and criteria. According to Article 52 of the European patent convention, these necessary criteria are: 1-novelty 2-innovative step 3-industrial application; in addition to the above three conditions, the invention should not be one of the exceptions to patent registration and should be disclosed. Method: In this article, with a descriptive and analytical method and relying on reliable sources, the method of evaluating the criteria required for patenting in the European Union has been discussed. Finding and Conclusion: The finding of this research shows that in the European patent office, based on paragraph 1 of Article 42 of the European patent convention, the problem-solution method, which is an objective criterion, is used to evaluate the innovative step condition. This approach was formed to deal with the phenomenon of commenting based on the personal inference of evaluators. In addition to the above approach, secondary criteria are also used in the evaluation of this condition. According to Article 57 of the European patent convention, the criterion for assessing the condition of industrial application in the European Union is a technical criterion that states the claimed invention, at the time of application, shows a specific application in a specific field. In the European Union, an invention is considered new when it is not part of the prior art or industry. Prior art or industry includes anything that has been mad
Title: Evaluation System of Patent Criteria in European Union Law
Description:
Field and Aims: An invention is the result of the inventor's intellectual effort, which is created in the form of an industrial product or industrial process.
The person who makes the invention has the right to patent that invention.
According to paragraph 1 of Article 60 of the European Patent Convention, the patent belongs to the inventor or his representative.
According to the European patent convention, for an invention to be eligible for a patent, it must meet the necessary conditions and criteria.
According to Article 52 of the European patent convention, these necessary criteria are: 1-novelty 2-innovative step 3-industrial application; in addition to the above three conditions, the invention should not be one of the exceptions to patent registration and should be disclosed.
Method: In this article, with a descriptive and analytical method and relying on reliable sources, the method of evaluating the criteria required for patenting in the European Union has been discussed.
Finding and Conclusion: The finding of this research shows that in the European patent office, based on paragraph 1 of Article 42 of the European patent convention, the problem-solution method, which is an objective criterion, is used to evaluate the innovative step condition.
This approach was formed to deal with the phenomenon of commenting based on the personal inference of evaluators.
In addition to the above approach, secondary criteria are also used in the evaluation of this condition.
According to Article 57 of the European patent convention, the criterion for assessing the condition of industrial application in the European Union is a technical criterion that states the claimed invention, at the time of application, shows a specific application in a specific field.
In the European Union, an invention is considered new when it is not part of the prior art or industry.
Prior art or industry includes anything that has been mad.

Related Results

Patent as Promise
Patent as Promise
<div> For patent law to serve its purpose of encouraging innovation, would-be inventors must believe that the government will honor its promise to protect their right to exc...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Contemporary Views on Economics of Patents
Contemporary Views on Economics of Patents
A patent is a legal right to exclude granted by the state to the inventor of a novel and useful invention. Much legal ink has been spilled on the meaning of these terms. “Novel” me...
Patent Law in Islamic Economics Challenges and Opportunities
Patent Law in Islamic Economics Challenges and Opportunities
One important way to protect intellectual property rights is to use patent law to encourage creativity and innovation. In Islamic economics, the application of patent law raises se...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...
Patent Monopoly-Protecting Your Ideas
Patent Monopoly-Protecting Your Ideas
Abstract For many companies and technical personnel in the petroleum industry, patents are a necessary part of doing business. In this paper, the monopoly provide...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...

Back to Top