Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The application analysis of 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube for thoracoscopic lobectomy of lung cancer

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Currently, thoracoscopic lobectomy is widely used in clinical practice, and postoperative placement of ultrafine drainage tube has advantages of reducing postoperative pain and accelerating postoperative recovery in patients. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of placement of 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube after thoracoscopic lobectomy and its superiority over traditional 24F chest drainage tube. Methods A retrospective data analysis was conducted in 134 patients who underwent placement of 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube or 24F chest drainage tube with thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer from January 2018 to December 2019. Patients with 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube were included in group A (n = 67) and those with 24F chest drainage tube were included in group B (n = 67). The drainage time, the total drainage volume, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain score and postoperative complication of both groups were analyzed and compared. Results Compared to group B, group A had lower pain scores on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3 (3.72 ± 0.65point vs 3.94 ± 0.67point, P = 0.027; 2.72 ± 0.93point vs 3.13 ± 1.04point, P = 0.016; and 1.87 ± 0.65point vs 2.39 ± 1.22point, P = 0.005), shorter drainage time (4.25 ± 1.79d vs 6.04 ± 1.96d, P = 0.000), fewer drainage volume (1100.42 ± 701.57 ml vs 1369.39 ± 624.25 ml, P = 0.021); and shorter postoperative hospital stay (8.46 ± 2.48d vs 9.37 ± 1.70d, P = 0.014). Postoperative complications such as subcutaneous emphysema, pulmonary infection, atelectasis, chest tube reinsertion and intrathoracic hemorrhage showed no differences between both groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Compared with 24F chest drainage tube, the application of an 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube after thoracoscopic lobectomy has significantly shortened the drainage time, reduced the total drainage volume, reduced the postoperative pain degree, shortened the hospital day, and effectively detected postoperative intrathoracic hemorrhage. So, it is considered as an effective, safe and reliable drainage method.
Title: The application analysis of 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube for thoracoscopic lobectomy of lung cancer
Description:
Abstract Background Currently, thoracoscopic lobectomy is widely used in clinical practice, and postoperative placement of ultrafine drainage tube has advantages of reducing postoperative pain and accelerating postoperative recovery in patients.
This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of placement of 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube after thoracoscopic lobectomy and its superiority over traditional 24F chest drainage tube.
Methods A retrospective data analysis was conducted in 134 patients who underwent placement of 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube or 24F chest drainage tube with thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer from January 2018 to December 2019.
Patients with 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube were included in group A (n = 67) and those with 24F chest drainage tube were included in group B (n = 67).
The drainage time, the total drainage volume, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain score and postoperative complication of both groups were analyzed and compared.
Results Compared to group B, group A had lower pain scores on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3 (3.
72 ± 0.
65point vs 3.
94 ± 0.
67point, P = 0.
027; 2.
72 ± 0.
93point vs 3.
13 ± 1.
04point, P = 0.
016; and 1.
87 ± 0.
65point vs 2.
39 ± 1.
22point, P = 0.
005), shorter drainage time (4.
25 ± 1.
79d vs 6.
04 ± 1.
96d, P = 0.
000), fewer drainage volume (1100.
42 ± 701.
57 ml vs 1369.
39 ± 624.
25 ml, P = 0.
021); and shorter postoperative hospital stay (8.
46 ± 2.
48d vs 9.
37 ± 1.
70d, P = 0.
014).
Postoperative complications such as subcutaneous emphysema, pulmonary infection, atelectasis, chest tube reinsertion and intrathoracic hemorrhage showed no differences between both groups (P > 0.
05).
Conclusion Compared with 24F chest drainage tube, the application of an 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube after thoracoscopic lobectomy has significantly shortened the drainage time, reduced the total drainage volume, reduced the postoperative pain degree, shortened the hospital day, and effectively detected postoperative intrathoracic hemorrhage.
So, it is considered as an effective, safe and reliable drainage method.

Related Results

Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
Segmentectomies in patients with primary malignant lung tumors
Segmentectomies in patients with primary malignant lung tumors
Objective. To study the immediate and long-term outcomes of segmentectomy and lobectomy for malignant lung tumors. Material and methods. A retrospective study included patients wit...
Hyalinizing Trabecular Tumor: A Case Series with Literature Review
Hyalinizing Trabecular Tumor: A Case Series with Literature Review
Abstract Introduction: Hyalinizing trabecular tumor (HTT) is a rare thyroid neoplasm originating from follicular cells and poses diagnostic challenges due to its cytologic and hist...
Mellkasi sérültek drenázsadatainak vizsgálata
Mellkasi sérültek drenázsadatainak vizsgálata
Abstract: Introduction: Chest injuries cause a significant number of pneumothorax (PTX) and hemothorax (HTX). The most commonly used treatment is chest-tube drainage. The position...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Comparison of the Efficacy of SP-VATS Segmentectomy, SP-VATS Lobectomy, and 3P-VATS of Lobectomy in NSCLC Patients
Comparison of the Efficacy of SP-VATS Segmentectomy, SP-VATS Lobectomy, and 3P-VATS of Lobectomy in NSCLC Patients
Abstract Objective: To analyze and study the clinical efficacy of single portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SP-VATS) segmentectomy, SP-VATS lobectomy, and convent...
Perioperative outcomes of robotic‐assisted versus video‐assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A propensity score matched analysis
Perioperative outcomes of robotic‐assisted versus video‐assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A propensity score matched analysis
AbstractBackgroundThe existing literature on perioperative outcomes of robotic‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) versus video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung lob...

Back to Top