Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Just Fee or Just a Fee? An Examination of Credit Card Late Fees

View through CrossRef
The Federal Credit CARD Act of 2009 made important changes to the credit card market, including a requirement that penalty fees be reasonable and proportional to the borrower’s violation. In interpreting "reasonable and proportional" an understanding of the nature of penalty fees is essential. Why do issuers charge them and what determines the amount that they charge? The majority of penalty fees collected by issuers come in the form of late fees. This study takes a closer look at the dynamics of late fee charges by constructing a database of issuer practices, to help understand how issuers set fees and finds the following: Nine of the top ten best predictors of late fees were related to deceptive or aggressive pricing. Issuers that are aggressive in areas outside of pricing tended to charge higher late fees. For example, issuers that send out a lot of cash advance checks or are aggressive in recovering losses charge higher late fees. The volume of complaints to the Better Business Bureau relative to the size of the issuer was another factor that was also significantly related to late fees. The type of issuer is strongly associated with late fee charges. The single best predictor of the amount an institution charges as a late fee is whether the issuer is a credit union. Credit unions charged a median fee of $20 compared to banks’ $39 for late fees. The type of issuer was a better predictor of late fee levels than risk (as measured by an issuer’s net losses on their credit card portfolio). Credit losses are a very weak predictor of late fee amounts. When other variables were included in the statistical analysis, higher risk was not correlated with higher late fees. The results suggest that, rather than as a means to deter behavior, issuer practices reflect an underlying revenue and pricing philosophy; this philosophy along with issuer type (most notably whether an issuer is a credit union) drive any observed relationship between losses and penalty fee prices.
Title: A Just Fee or Just a Fee? An Examination of Credit Card Late Fees
Description:
The Federal Credit CARD Act of 2009 made important changes to the credit card market, including a requirement that penalty fees be reasonable and proportional to the borrower’s violation.
In interpreting "reasonable and proportional" an understanding of the nature of penalty fees is essential.
Why do issuers charge them and what determines the amount that they charge? The majority of penalty fees collected by issuers come in the form of late fees.
This study takes a closer look at the dynamics of late fee charges by constructing a database of issuer practices, to help understand how issuers set fees and finds the following: Nine of the top ten best predictors of late fees were related to deceptive or aggressive pricing.
Issuers that are aggressive in areas outside of pricing tended to charge higher late fees.
For example, issuers that send out a lot of cash advance checks or are aggressive in recovering losses charge higher late fees.
The volume of complaints to the Better Business Bureau relative to the size of the issuer was another factor that was also significantly related to late fees.
The type of issuer is strongly associated with late fee charges.
The single best predictor of the amount an institution charges as a late fee is whether the issuer is a credit union.
Credit unions charged a median fee of $20 compared to banks’ $39 for late fees.
The type of issuer was a better predictor of late fee levels than risk (as measured by an issuer’s net losses on their credit card portfolio).
Credit losses are a very weak predictor of late fee amounts.
When other variables were included in the statistical analysis, higher risk was not correlated with higher late fees.
The results suggest that, rather than as a means to deter behavior, issuer practices reflect an underlying revenue and pricing philosophy; this philosophy along with issuer type (most notably whether an issuer is a credit union) drive any observed relationship between losses and penalty fee prices.

Related Results

The cost of convenience
The cost of convenience
Hospitality businesses in New Zealand are seeing fewer and fewer payments made by cash, as customers opt for the convenience of paying their bill electronically. If customers love ...
The Proportional Fee, Transaction Fee and Membership Fee
The Proportional Fee, Transaction Fee and Membership Fee
There are in general three types of fees used by platforms: the fixed membership fee, transaction fee and proportional fee. In real-life, all three fees are used by different platf...
Some legal issues about credit cards in Vietnam - Compare with US law provisions
Some legal issues about credit cards in Vietnam - Compare with US law provisions
Credit card service is a relatively special type of service. In essence, the specialness of this type of business is expressed in the fact that credit institutions have combined th...
The Economics of Credit Cards
The Economics of Credit Cards
The skyrocketing bankruptcy filing rates of recent years are well known. Some commentators and scholars have charged that the cause of the bankruptcy boom has been promiscuous lend...
Analisis Pemberian Pembiayaan Pada PT. BPRS Al-Washliyah Medan
Analisis Pemberian Pembiayaan Pada PT. BPRS Al-Washliyah Medan
This study aims to determine the procedure for granting credit, as well as the obstacles that occur in collecting non-performing loans at PT. BPRS Al Washliyah Medan. The results s...
Credit Cards: A Sectoral Analysis
Credit Cards: A Sectoral Analysis
Background: India, being one among the fastest growing economies in the World, yet there exists an enormous gap in having access to formal credit when compared to advanced countrie...
Consumer Credit and Payment Cards
Consumer Credit and Payment Cards
We consider debit and credit card networks. Our contribution is to introduce the role of consumer credit into these payment networks, and to assess the way this affects competition...

Back to Top