Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Comparison of Three Guidelines on Recommendations of Antidote Storage in the Hospital
View through CrossRef
Introduction:
Antidote stocking is a crucial part in the treatment of poisoned patients. There are multiple guidelines providing recommendations on the stocking of antidotes. This study aimed to compare the recommendations in three different guidelines.
Methods:
Three guidelines on antidote stocking were compared: the United States’ Expert Consensus Guidelines for Stocking of Antidotes in Hospitals That Provide Emergency Care, the United Kingdom’s Royal College of Emergency Medicine and National Poisons Information Service Guideline on Antidote Availability for Emergency Departments, and Australia’s Queensland Poisons Information Centre (QPIC) guideline. The comparison focused on recommendations for antidote availability and stocking quantities.
Results:
The US, UK, and Australian guidelines made recommendations for 45, 40, and 40 antidotes, respectively. Antivenom recommendations differed significantly among the guidelines. Only the US and UK guidelines further categorised antidotes based on urgency, providing recommendations on whether antidotes should be immediately available or within an hour. The Australian guideline only provided recommendations on whether to stock the antidote, without specifying urgency. The three guidelines concurred in their recommendations for 22 antidotes that should be stocked in hospitals.
The US and UK guidelines provided recommendations on the quantities of each antidote to be stored for treating an adult during the first 24 hours. The UK guideline also indicated any special storage conditions. In contrast, the Australian guideline recommended varying quantities of antidotes to be stored according to the locality of health facilities, with tertiary facilities recommended to keep the largest quantities and rural facilities the least.
Conclusion:
The recommendations from various guidelines concurred on most antidotes to be kept. Anti-venom recommendations differed, likely due to geographical variations. Storage quantity recommendations were based on amounts for initial treatment up to 24 hours or practical considerations such as locality.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: A Comparison of Three Guidelines on Recommendations of Antidote Storage in the Hospital
Description:
Introduction:
Antidote stocking is a crucial part in the treatment of poisoned patients.
There are multiple guidelines providing recommendations on the stocking of antidotes.
This study aimed to compare the recommendations in three different guidelines.
Methods:
Three guidelines on antidote stocking were compared: the United States’ Expert Consensus Guidelines for Stocking of Antidotes in Hospitals That Provide Emergency Care, the United Kingdom’s Royal College of Emergency Medicine and National Poisons Information Service Guideline on Antidote Availability for Emergency Departments, and Australia’s Queensland Poisons Information Centre (QPIC) guideline.
The comparison focused on recommendations for antidote availability and stocking quantities.
Results:
The US, UK, and Australian guidelines made recommendations for 45, 40, and 40 antidotes, respectively.
Antivenom recommendations differed significantly among the guidelines.
Only the US and UK guidelines further categorised antidotes based on urgency, providing recommendations on whether antidotes should be immediately available or within an hour.
The Australian guideline only provided recommendations on whether to stock the antidote, without specifying urgency.
The three guidelines concurred in their recommendations for 22 antidotes that should be stocked in hospitals.
The US and UK guidelines provided recommendations on the quantities of each antidote to be stored for treating an adult during the first 24 hours.
The UK guideline also indicated any special storage conditions.
In contrast, the Australian guideline recommended varying quantities of antidotes to be stored according to the locality of health facilities, with tertiary facilities recommended to keep the largest quantities and rural facilities the least.
Conclusion:
The recommendations from various guidelines concurred on most antidotes to be kept.
Anti-venom recommendations differed, likely due to geographical variations.
Storage quantity recommendations were based on amounts for initial treatment up to 24 hours or practical considerations such as locality.
Related Results
Potable Water Sources, Household Hygiene, and Sanitation Practices in Ikpoba Okha LGA, Edo State: Implications for Public Health and Sustainable Water Management
Omoregie, Andrew Edosa.1 Omoregie Abieyuwa Peace2 Okoro, Enyinnaya Okoro.3
1 College of Medi
Potable Water Sources, Household Hygiene, and Sanitation Practices in Ikpoba Okha LGA, Edo State: Implications for Public Health and Sustainable Water Management
Omoregie, Andrew Edosa.1 Omoregie Abieyuwa Peace2 Okoro, Enyinnaya Okoro.3
1 College of Medi
BACKGROUND
Access to potable drinking water and sufficient sanitation continues to be an urgent global concern, particularly in developing regions where con...
Antidote Response Network
Antidote Response Network
Introduction:
The Antidote Response Network (ARN) strengthens local preparedness and response to a chemical incident by addressing local antidote availability, ...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Carbon Storage Assurance Facility Enterprise (CarbonSAFE): Carbon Storage Infrastructure Development for a Sustainable Future
Carbon Storage Assurance Facility Enterprise (CarbonSAFE): Carbon Storage Infrastructure Development for a Sustainable Future
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management’s (FECM) Carbon Transport and Storage (CTS) Program focuses on addressing technical and non-techni...
Préparation d'un antidote neutralisant les anticoagulants oraux directs anti-FXa
Préparation d'un antidote neutralisant les anticoagulants oraux directs anti-FXa
En France, ce sont presque 2 millions de sujets âgés de plus de 65 ans qui sont traités actuellement par un anticoagulant classique ou, par un anticoagulant oral (AOD) qui cible sp...
Divergent C. elegans toxin alleles are suppressed by distinct mechanisms
Divergent C. elegans toxin alleles are suppressed by distinct mechanisms
Toxin-antidote elements (TAs) are selfish DNA sequences that bias their transmission to the next generation. TAs typically consist of two linked genes: a toxin and an antidote. The...
Gender Differences in Authorship and Quality of Anesthesia Clinical Practice Guidelines From 2016 to 2020 Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrument
Gender Differences in Authorship and Quality of Anesthesia Clinical Practice Guidelines From 2016 to 2020 Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrument
INTRODUCTION:
Women continue to be underrepresented in academic anesthesiology. This study assessed guidelines in anesthesia journals over the past 5 years, eva...

