Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An External Acetabular Alignment Guide Decreases Positional Variance

View through CrossRef
Introduction: Certain patient and operative factors limit accurate estimation of acetabular component positioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to determine whether an intraoperative external alignment guide decreases variance in acetabular component positioning. Materials and Methods: Adult patients who underwent primary THA from 2014–2018 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria were navigation, robot-assisted surgery, and inflammatory, post-traumatic, or avascular arthritis. One surgeon used an external guide while the second surgeon resected osteophytes and utilized available anatomical landmarks for positioning. Anteversion and inclination, variance, “safe zone” positioning, operative time, and hip instability were assessed. Multivariable regression models were used to examine effects on primary and secondary outcomes. Results: 409 patients were included, of which 182 underwent component placement with landmarks only. Patients undergoing component placement with landmarks only were younger (p=0.002) and more often smokers (p=0.016). After multivariable risk adjustment, use of the external alignment guide was independently associated with 2.7° higher anteversion (CI: 1.6° to 3.8°) and smaller anteversion variance (-0.3, CI: -0.6 to 0.1) compared to landmarks only. It was independently associated with 3.2° higher inclination (CI: 2.0° to 4.4°), but there was no difference in inclination variance (-0.1, CI: -0.3 to 0.2). The external alignment guide was independently associated with a 14-minute shorter operative time (CI: 9.6 to 18.7) and smaller operative time variance (-0.9, CI: -1.2 to 0.6). Discussion: Use of anatomical landmarks alone was associated with increased likelihood of safe zone positioning but lower precision and longer operative time. While this study was limited by lack of randomization and its retrospective nature, an acetabular positioner may be preferable to palpable or visible anatomy alone for acetabular component placement.
Title: An External Acetabular Alignment Guide Decreases Positional Variance
Description:
Introduction: Certain patient and operative factors limit accurate estimation of acetabular component positioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA).
This study aimed to determine whether an intraoperative external alignment guide decreases variance in acetabular component positioning.
Materials and Methods: Adult patients who underwent primary THA from 2014–2018 were reviewed.
Exclusion criteria were navigation, robot-assisted surgery, and inflammatory, post-traumatic, or avascular arthritis.
One surgeon used an external guide while the second surgeon resected osteophytes and utilized available anatomical landmarks for positioning.
Anteversion and inclination, variance, “safe zone” positioning, operative time, and hip instability were assessed.
Multivariable regression models were used to examine effects on primary and secondary outcomes.
Results: 409 patients were included, of which 182 underwent component placement with landmarks only.
Patients undergoing component placement with landmarks only were younger (p=0.
002) and more often smokers (p=0.
016).
After multivariable risk adjustment, use of the external alignment guide was independently associated with 2.
7° higher anteversion (CI: 1.
6° to 3.
8°) and smaller anteversion variance (-0.
3, CI: -0.
6 to 0.
1) compared to landmarks only.
It was independently associated with 3.
2° higher inclination (CI: 2.
0° to 4.
4°), but there was no difference in inclination variance (-0.
1, CI: -0.
3 to 0.
2).
The external alignment guide was independently associated with a 14-minute shorter operative time (CI: 9.
6 to 18.
7) and smaller operative time variance (-0.
9, CI: -1.
2 to 0.
6).
Discussion: Use of anatomical landmarks alone was associated with increased likelihood of safe zone positioning but lower precision and longer operative time.
While this study was limited by lack of randomization and its retrospective nature, an acetabular positioner may be preferable to palpable or visible anatomy alone for acetabular component placement.

Related Results

The Transverse Acetabular Ligament: Optimizing Version
The Transverse Acetabular Ligament: Optimizing Version
In total hip arthroplasty (THA), excessive retroversion is associated with posterior instability, anterior impingement, and resultant groin pain. Excessive anteversion can lead to ...
The Salter innominate osteotomy does not lead to acetabular retroversion
The Salter innominate osteotomy does not lead to acetabular retroversion
In children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), Salter’s innominate osteotomy aims to surgically manipulate the acetabulum to increase anterior coverage and aid joint su...
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract Introduction The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
Acetabular Rim Variants
Acetabular Rim Variants
Background and Indications: Acetabular rim ossification variants have a reported incidence of 17%. These variants include labral calcifications, os acetabuli or acetabu...
Peri-acetabular bone mineral density in total hip replacement
Peri-acetabular bone mineral density in total hip replacement
ObjectivesTo quantify and compare peri-acetabular bone mineral density (BMD) between a monoblock acetabular component using a metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing and a modular titanium sh...
Evaluation results of using GAP II acetabular cage for acetabulum in revision total hip arthroplasty
Evaluation results of using GAP II acetabular cage for acetabulum in revision total hip arthroplasty
Acetabular revision arthroplasty with major bone loss is one of the most difficult operations in hip arthroplasty, The graft augmentation prosthesis (GAP) has been designed particu...
Acetabulum Cup Alignment with and Without Guide in Total Hip Replacement
Acetabulum Cup Alignment with and Without Guide in Total Hip Replacement
Introduction: Successful total hip replacement (THR) depends on the precise concentricity of acetabular cups. Malposition may cause dislocation, impingement, early loosening, and r...
Changes of Variability in Response to Increasing Greenhouse Gases. Part II: Hydrology
Changes of Variability in Response to Increasing Greenhouse Gases. Part II: Hydrology
Abstract This paper examines hydrological variability and its changes in two different versions of a coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation model developed at ...

Back to Top