Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Portal Setup: the Key Point in the Learning Curve for Hip Arthroscopy Technique
View through CrossRef
ObjectiveTo analyze the learning curve experience of hip arthroscopy based on patient demographics, surgical time, portal setup time, and postoperative complications and to find the key point in the learning curve.MethodsFrom May 2016 to February 2019, a prospective study on the learning curve experience of hip arthroscopy was performed in our hospital. We evaluated the first 50 consecutive hip arthroscopy procedures performed by a single surgeon. There were nine females and 41 males with a mean age of 30.8 years. We divide the patients into early group and late group according to the date of their operation, with each group including 25 patients. Data on patient demographics, types of procedure, surgical time, portal setup time, and postoperative complications were collected. Functional scores were assessed with the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).ResultsPatients were followed up for 16.4 months on average (range, 13–27 months). The early group of patients had a mean age of 35.2 years and the late group a mean age of 26.5 years. The most common procedures performed for the early group were debridement (17 patients, 68%), and in the late group, most patients underwent labral repair (18 patients, 72%). Mean total surgical time was 168 min for the early group and 143 min for the late group, and there was no statistically significant difference between two groups. The portal setup time in the early group and late group was 40.2 ± 12.4 min and 18.5 ± 6.2 min, respectively (P < 0.001), and the portal setup time was significantly longer in the early group. Further analysis of the learning curve of portal setup showed that the average portal setup time was not statistically significant changed after 30 cases. There were six complications including iatrogenic cartilage injury and iatrogenic labrum injury in the early group and five complications including perineal crush injury and nerve stretch injury in the late group. The functional score of patients in the late group was significantly higher than that in the early group during follow‐up.ConclusionThe steep learning curve of hip arthroscopy is mainly caused by the challenge of portal setup and portalrelated complications were more common in the early group than in the late group. Surgical time is not an effective indicator for evaluating progress on the learning curve of hip arthroscopy.
Title: Portal Setup: the Key Point in the Learning Curve for Hip Arthroscopy Technique
Description:
ObjectiveTo analyze the learning curve experience of hip arthroscopy based on patient demographics, surgical time, portal setup time, and postoperative complications and to find the key point in the learning curve.
MethodsFrom May 2016 to February 2019, a prospective study on the learning curve experience of hip arthroscopy was performed in our hospital.
We evaluated the first 50 consecutive hip arthroscopy procedures performed by a single surgeon.
There were nine females and 41 males with a mean age of 30.
8 years.
We divide the patients into early group and late group according to the date of their operation, with each group including 25 patients.
Data on patient demographics, types of procedure, surgical time, portal setup time, and postoperative complications were collected.
Functional scores were assessed with the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).
ResultsPatients were followed up for 16.
4 months on average (range, 13–27 months).
The early group of patients had a mean age of 35.
2 years and the late group a mean age of 26.
5 years.
The most common procedures performed for the early group were debridement (17 patients, 68%), and in the late group, most patients underwent labral repair (18 patients, 72%).
Mean total surgical time was 168 min for the early group and 143 min for the late group, and there was no statistically significant difference between two groups.
The portal setup time in the early group and late group was 40.
2 ± 12.
4 min and 18.
5 ± 6.
2 min, respectively (P < 0.
001), and the portal setup time was significantly longer in the early group.
Further analysis of the learning curve of portal setup showed that the average portal setup time was not statistically significant changed after 30 cases.
There were six complications including iatrogenic cartilage injury and iatrogenic labrum injury in the early group and five complications including perineal crush injury and nerve stretch injury in the late group.
The functional score of patients in the late group was significantly higher than that in the early group during follow‐up.
ConclusionThe steep learning curve of hip arthroscopy is mainly caused by the challenge of portal setup and portalrelated complications were more common in the early group than in the late group.
Surgical time is not an effective indicator for evaluating progress on the learning curve of hip arthroscopy.
Related Results
Hip Arthroscopy and Its Impact on Performance in National Hockey League Players Using Team-Based Advanced Performance Statistics
Hip Arthroscopy and Its Impact on Performance in National Hockey League Players Using Team-Based Advanced Performance Statistics
Background: Ice hockey players have a high rate of hip pathology, which can lead to hip arthroscopy. Previous studies have not utilized team-based advanced performance statistics i...
Mix En Meng It Op: Emile YX?'s Alternative Race and Language Politics in South African Hip-Hop
Mix En Meng It Op: Emile YX?'s Alternative Race and Language Politics in South African Hip-Hop
This paper explores South African hip-hop activist Emile YX?'s work to suggest that he presents an alternative take on mainstream US and South African hip-hop. While it is arguable...
Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy
Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy
Objectives: Modern treatment of hip dysplasia has focused on the correction of the structural deformity with the periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), which addresses the deformity by re...
DXA-derived hip shape is associated with hip fracture: a longitudinal study of 38,123 UK Biobank participants
DXA-derived hip shape is associated with hip fracture: a longitudinal study of 38,123 UK Biobank participants
Abstract
Despite advancements in fracture prediction tools and osteoporosis management, hip fractures remain a significant consequence of bone fragility, with a 22% one...
Evaluating the compatibility between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy in diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury
Evaluating the compatibility between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy in diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury
Introduction: This research aims to evaluate the compatibility between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy in diagnosis of types and locations of anterior cruciate lig...
Editor's welcome, PORTAL, Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2004
Editor's welcome, PORTAL, Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2004
Welcome to the inaugural issue of PORTAL
On behalf of the Executive Editorial Committee of PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, it is a great ple...
EP6.2 A Neuromuscular Based Hip Injury Prevention Program (HIPP) for Adolescent Athletes at Risk for Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement
EP6.2 A Neuromuscular Based Hip Injury Prevention Program (HIPP) for Adolescent Athletes at Risk for Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement
Abstract
The overall prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and symptomatic hip labral tears is estimated to be between 14-17% in asymptomatic young adults...
20 Does hip involvement affect foot and ankle in juvenile idiopathic arthritis?
20 Does hip involvement affect foot and ankle in juvenile idiopathic arthritis?
Abstract
Background
Although ankle and foot involvements are common in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), they are often negle...

