Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Apologies and Accounts
View through CrossRef
Apology is an action in which one admits the wrongfulness of an act and one’s responsibility for it in dealing with some type of problematic situation, such as interactional offenses in conversation, rule-breaking behaviors, embarrassment, violations of expectations, and social predicaments that can damage relationships. Account is another action in which one tries to explain such a situation so that one can transform the problematic quality of it. Apologies and accounts are both communication practices used to deal with problematic situations, and they can therefore be dealt with together. These two actions are ubiquitous in everyday lives, and studies on them, therefore, especially on apologies, abound across many disciplines. The concepts of apologies and accounts are important for three reasons. First, they help us understand the way in which society is maintained through individual conduct. By apologizing, one claims that one’s act was an exception to the rule, and, as a result, the original rule is sustained. Second, the concepts of apologies and accounts help us understand the way in which one restores one’s preferred image of self, or “face,” and the other’s face, as well as the relationship with the other. Third, these concepts help us explore culturally appropriate communication conduct. By engaging in apologies and accounts, one’s taken-for-granted views of what is wrong and what is acceptable can be revealed. Apologies have been studied in a variety of contexts (e.g., interpersonal, organizational, political, mediated, cultural) and in various fields, including philosophy, sociology, social psychology, sociolinguistics, cross-cultural pragmatics, applied linguistics, rhetoric, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, interpersonal communication, and intercultural communication. Because there has been far more research on the topic than could be covered in one article, this piece focuses on apologies and accounts mainly in interpersonal face-to-face settings, with an emphasis on literature in communication. It also touches on apologies made by political figures. For apologies in other public arenas (e.g., media and online apologies; corporate apologies in crisis communication; apologies in judicial, medical, religious, and international conflicts), see other sources, such as the separate Oxford Bibliographies article “Image Repair Theory.”
Title: Apologies and Accounts
Description:
Apology is an action in which one admits the wrongfulness of an act and one’s responsibility for it in dealing with some type of problematic situation, such as interactional offenses in conversation, rule-breaking behaviors, embarrassment, violations of expectations, and social predicaments that can damage relationships.
Account is another action in which one tries to explain such a situation so that one can transform the problematic quality of it.
Apologies and accounts are both communication practices used to deal with problematic situations, and they can therefore be dealt with together.
These two actions are ubiquitous in everyday lives, and studies on them, therefore, especially on apologies, abound across many disciplines.
The concepts of apologies and accounts are important for three reasons.
First, they help us understand the way in which society is maintained through individual conduct.
By apologizing, one claims that one’s act was an exception to the rule, and, as a result, the original rule is sustained.
Second, the concepts of apologies and accounts help us understand the way in which one restores one’s preferred image of self, or “face,” and the other’s face, as well as the relationship with the other.
Third, these concepts help us explore culturally appropriate communication conduct.
By engaging in apologies and accounts, one’s taken-for-granted views of what is wrong and what is acceptable can be revealed.
Apologies have been studied in a variety of contexts (e.
g.
, interpersonal, organizational, political, mediated, cultural) and in various fields, including philosophy, sociology, social psychology, sociolinguistics, cross-cultural pragmatics, applied linguistics, rhetoric, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, interpersonal communication, and intercultural communication.
Because there has been far more research on the topic than could be covered in one article, this piece focuses on apologies and accounts mainly in interpersonal face-to-face settings, with an emphasis on literature in communication.
It also touches on apologies made by political figures.
For apologies in other public arenas (e.
g.
, media and online apologies; corporate apologies in crisis communication; apologies in judicial, medical, religious, and international conflicts), see other sources, such as the separate Oxford Bibliographies article “Image Repair Theory.
”.
Related Results
Apologies to Indigenous Peoples in Comparative Perspective
Apologies to Indigenous Peoples in Comparative Perspective
Australia, Canada, and the United States formally apologized to their Indigenous peoples in February 2008, June 2008, and December 2009, respectively. The Indigenous peoples in the...
A Linguo-Cultural Approach to Apologies: The Cases of English and Spanish
A Linguo-Cultural Approach to Apologies: The Cases of English and Spanish
Apologies are both speech acts and face-threatening acts. While apologies have received scholarly attention, they have rarely been examined through a linguo-cultural lens, i.e., st...
Reconstructing apology: David Cameron's Bloody Sunday apology in the press
Reconstructing apology: David Cameron's Bloody Sunday apology in the press
While there is an acknowledgement in apology research that political apologies are highly mediated, the process of mediation itself has lacked scrutiny. This article suggests that ...
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background:#f9f9f4"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><b><spa...
Against Mixed Epistemology
Against Mixed Epistemology
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2015v19n2p183We can call any reductive account of knowledge that appeals to both safety and ability conditions a mixed account of knowledge. Exa...
Fostering Social Cohesion in Post‐Conflict Societies: The Power of Normative Apologies in Reducing Competitive Victimhood and Enhancing Reconciliation and Intergroup Negotiation
Fostering Social Cohesion in Post‐Conflict Societies: The Power of Normative Apologies in Reducing Competitive Victimhood and Enhancing Reconciliation and Intergroup Negotiation
ABSTRACTThe present research investigated whether a normative outgroup apology enhances conciliatory attitudes (i.e., willingness for intergroup contact and feelings of peace) and ...
Apologies and Remedial Episodes
Apologies and Remedial Episodes
Apology is an action in which one admits the wrongful nature of an act and one's responsibility for it in dealing with some type of problematic situation; for instance violations o...
Land Degradation Assessment in Pakistan based on LU and VCF
Land Degradation Assessment in Pakistan based on LU and VCF
Abstract
Land degradation is a global environmental issue receiving much attention currently. According to the definition and interpretation of land degradation by relevant...

