Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Neo-Kantianism, Russian

View through CrossRef
A rather amorphous movement, Russian Neo-Kantianism, in the first decades of the twentieth century, found its most visible and enduring representatives in A. Vvedenskii and his student/disciple I. Lapshin, both of St Petersburg University, who together took a distinct stance within the movement as a whole. Both were chiefly concerned with epistemological issues although their respective publications revealed a much wider field of interests. Both maintained an allegiance to the spirit of Kantian philosophy while devoting little attention to the intricacies of the three Kantian Critiques. In addition, at Moscow University G. Chelpanov adhered to the ideality of the Kantian categories although he upheld an ultimate realism. In the social sciences P. Novgorodtsev and B. Kistiakovskii defended positions revealing a significant debt to the Baden School of German Neo-Kantianism, and as such they were deeply involved in methodological investigations. Several others (N. Berdiaev, P. Struve, G. Shpet) within Russia also briefly espoused a Neo-Kantianism after abandoning Marxism and before moving on to a usually more idealistic stance. Still another, younger group a decade later, centred chiefly around the journal Logos, maintained an idiosyncratic, though not fully articulated, amalgam of Kantian and Hegelian doctrines. The Bolshevik Revolution led to a decimation of what remained of the movement within Russia and a dispersal of its members, who became increasingly isolated from current philosophical trends and issues.
Title: Neo-Kantianism, Russian
Description:
A rather amorphous movement, Russian Neo-Kantianism, in the first decades of the twentieth century, found its most visible and enduring representatives in A.
Vvedenskii and his student/disciple I.
Lapshin, both of St Petersburg University, who together took a distinct stance within the movement as a whole.
Both were chiefly concerned with epistemological issues although their respective publications revealed a much wider field of interests.
Both maintained an allegiance to the spirit of Kantian philosophy while devoting little attention to the intricacies of the three Kantian Critiques.
In addition, at Moscow University G.
Chelpanov adhered to the ideality of the Kantian categories although he upheld an ultimate realism.
In the social sciences P.
Novgorodtsev and B.
Kistiakovskii defended positions revealing a significant debt to the Baden School of German Neo-Kantianism, and as such they were deeply involved in methodological investigations.
Several others (N.
Berdiaev, P.
Struve, G.
Shpet) within Russia also briefly espoused a Neo-Kantianism after abandoning Marxism and before moving on to a usually more idealistic stance.
Still another, younger group a decade later, centred chiefly around the journal Logos, maintained an idiosyncratic, though not fully articulated, amalgam of Kantian and Hegelian doctrines.
The Bolshevik Revolution led to a decimation of what remained of the movement within Russia and a dispersal of its members, who became increasingly isolated from current philosophical trends and issues.

Related Results

Neokantyści Wilhelm Windelband, Heinrich Rickert i Ernst Cassirer wobec filozofii renesansu
Neokantyści Wilhelm Windelband, Heinrich Rickert i Ernst Cassirer wobec filozofii renesansu
Neo-Kantianism as a philosophical formation is characterised primarily by its reference to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Nevertheless, to say that the essence of Neo-Kantianism ...
NEO-KANTIANISM AND GEORG SIMMEL'S INTERPRETATION OF KANT
NEO-KANTIANISM AND GEORG SIMMEL'S INTERPRETATION OF KANT
This essay explores the development of Georg Simmel's interpretation of Immanuel Kant's philosophy in the context of neo-Kantianism and its preoccupation with the question of unity...
The term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries: the specifics of its existence
The term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries: the specifics of its existence
The article is devoted to the specifics of existence of the term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries. The foreign texts, which contain the t...
El líder de la élite neopentecostal costarricence Rony Chaves y su discurso geoestratégico
El líder de la élite neopentecostal costarricence Rony Chaves y su discurso geoestratégico
Since the 80s-decade, Costa Rica, like many other countries of the American continent has been experiencing exponential growth of the neo-pentecostalism movement. Therewith, this p...
Determination and dietary risk assessment of neonicotinoid and insect growth regulators in honey
Determination and dietary risk assessment of neonicotinoid and insect growth regulators in honey
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the presence, concentrations, dietary intake, and risk of residues of neonicotinoids (NEO) and insect growth regulators (IGR) in commerc...
Die Neue Fries’sche Schule versus Neukantianismus
Die Neue Fries’sche Schule versus Neukantianismus
The subject of this article is the divergences between the various directions and phases of Neo-Kantianism. It is an attempt to answer the question of why there were heated polemic...

Back to Top