Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Thinning Biologics Patent Thickets

View through CrossRef
For decades, pharmaceutical manufacturers have employed strategies to protect their drug monopolies, preventing the entry of competitors and maintaining high drug prices. One of the strategies pharmaceutical manufacturers, particularly biologics manufacturers, have used to maintain market exclusivity and thwart competition has been patent thickets.&nbsp; <br><br>Biologics patent thickets are created when manufacturers accumulate many patents-sometimes in the hundreds-on one drug product. Patent thickets serve two purposes. First, they provide extended patent exclusivity for the biologic, delaying the possibility of biosimilar competition. Second, they raise the transaction costs for prospective biosimilar entrants, as the associated patent infringement litigation is expensive and it can be difficult to determine if biosimilar competitors would be infringing on any of the numerous patents in the thicket. As a result, patent thickets maintain high drug prices, raise barriers for patient access, and increase healthcare spending. Further, patent thickets may have unintended consequences on pharmaceutical innovation, preventing and incremental innovation in biologics.&nbsp;<br><br>Lawmakers and advocates have called for interventions to stem the frequency of patent thickets in the pharmaceutical market. Yet several barriers have impeded efforts to dismantle patent thickets through litigation or to deter their development through reforms. In particular, the regulatory dynamics within the pharmaceutical industry, especially related to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), change how the incentives of patent exclusivity work&nbsp;compared to other industries. These regulatory challenges both highlight the underlying problem encouraging patent thickets and point to solutions to promote access to medicines and biosimilar competition. <br><br>This Article engages with the existing FDA regulatory incentives and dynamics to frame the debate surrounding biologics patent thickets, focusing on the goals of promoting access to medicines and biosimilar competition. It illustrates why biologics patent thickets are a problem, characterizing the suboptimal regulatory, innovation, and public health incentives present in the current system, and identifies the legal, regulatory, and practical barriers impeding potential and proposed reforms. This Article then presents potential solutions to address biologics patent thickets and recommends a change to the rights granted by FDA approval – requiring manufacturers permit biosimilar competition after the end of their regulatory exclusivities. Such a solution could accelerate biosimilar competition, promote access to affordable medications, and recalibrate the current innovation and patent incentives for biologics.
Elsevier BV
Title: Thinning Biologics Patent Thickets
Description:
For decades, pharmaceutical manufacturers have employed strategies to protect their drug monopolies, preventing the entry of competitors and maintaining high drug prices.
One of the strategies pharmaceutical manufacturers, particularly biologics manufacturers, have used to maintain market exclusivity and thwart competition has been patent thickets.
&nbsp; <br><br>Biologics patent thickets are created when manufacturers accumulate many patents-sometimes in the hundreds-on one drug product.
Patent thickets serve two purposes.
First, they provide extended patent exclusivity for the biologic, delaying the possibility of biosimilar competition.
Second, they raise the transaction costs for prospective biosimilar entrants, as the associated patent infringement litigation is expensive and it can be difficult to determine if biosimilar competitors would be infringing on any of the numerous patents in the thicket.
As a result, patent thickets maintain high drug prices, raise barriers for patient access, and increase healthcare spending.
Further, patent thickets may have unintended consequences on pharmaceutical innovation, preventing and incremental innovation in biologics.
&nbsp;<br><br>Lawmakers and advocates have called for interventions to stem the frequency of patent thickets in the pharmaceutical market.
Yet several barriers have impeded efforts to dismantle patent thickets through litigation or to deter their development through reforms.
In particular, the regulatory dynamics within the pharmaceutical industry, especially related to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), change how the incentives of patent exclusivity work&nbsp;compared to other industries.
These regulatory challenges both highlight the underlying problem encouraging patent thickets and point to solutions to promote access to medicines and biosimilar competition.
<br><br>This Article engages with the existing FDA regulatory incentives and dynamics to frame the debate surrounding biologics patent thickets, focusing on the goals of promoting access to medicines and biosimilar competition.
It illustrates why biologics patent thickets are a problem, characterizing the suboptimal regulatory, innovation, and public health incentives present in the current system, and identifies the legal, regulatory, and practical barriers impeding potential and proposed reforms.
This Article then presents potential solutions to address biologics patent thickets and recommends a change to the rights granted by FDA approval – requiring manufacturers permit biosimilar competition after the end of their regulatory exclusivities.
Such a solution could accelerate biosimilar competition, promote access to affordable medications, and recalibrate the current innovation and patent incentives for biologics.

Related Results

Patent as Promise
Patent as Promise
<div> For patent law to serve its purpose of encouraging innovation, would-be inventors must believe that the government will honor its promise to protect their right to exc...
Empirically Detecting Patent Thickets
Empirically Detecting Patent Thickets
Patent thickets exist and given the current developments, they continue to persist. Patent thickets enable blocking patent right holders to hold-up other firms, and thereby they co...
Patent Litigation and the Internet
Patent Litigation and the Internet
Patent infringement litigation has not only increased dramatically in frequency over the past few decades, but also has also seen striking growth in both stakes and cost. Although ...
Holocene thinning history of David Glacier, Antarctica
Holocene thinning history of David Glacier, Antarctica
<p>The Antarctic Ice Sheet is a significant component of the Earth System, modulating Earth‘s sea level and climate. Present day and projected ice mass losses from Antarctica...
Patent Pool Outsiders
Patent Pool Outsiders
Individuals who decline to join cooperative groups — outsiders — raise concerns in many areas of law and policy. From trade policy to climate agreements to class action procedures,...
Contemporary Views on Economics of Patents
Contemporary Views on Economics of Patents
A patent is a legal right to exclude granted by the state to the inventor of a novel and useful invention. Much legal ink has been spilled on the meaning of these terms. “Novel” me...
Patents, Disclosure, and Biopiracy
Patents, Disclosure, and Biopiracy
One of the core requirements of patentability is that patent applicants provide background and contextual information about their invention to the patent office. This disclosure is...

Back to Top