Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Mental Illness Stigma Research Based on the Quad Model and ReAL Model: From Personal-centered Perspective

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background:Currently, there remain some ambiguities in the research on mental illness stigma. One issue is that studies on the relationship between explicit and implicit stigmas of mental illness are divided into two camps: the high-correlation theory, which suggests a unity between the two, and the low-correlation theory, which advocates for their separation. Another issue is the "relativity" of the results from Implicit Association Tests (IATs), which has led to controversy over research conclusions. Methods:A total of 62 college students were recruited as volunteers to participate in the study, which employed a range of psychological scales, including emotional scales, social distance scales, and stereotype scales. The explicit attitudes of the participants toward mental illness were examined through latent profile analysis, while the implicit attitudes were assessed using Implicit Association Tests(IAT), analyzed based on the quad model and the ReAL model. Additionally, the study explored the relationship between explicit and implicit attitudes toward mental illness. Results:Based on the heterogeneity in college students' explicit attitudes toward mental illness, they could be divided into two subgroups, named "Acceptance Group" (39.66%) and "Stigma Group" (60.34%), respectively. The "mental Illness patients - negative" automatic activation parameter (AC, Quad model, χ2(1)=28.807, p<0.001) and the evaluative associative processing parameter for mental Illness patients (A, ReAL model, χ2(1)=10.826, p<0.01) reached significance, both indicating that college students have a significant negative implicit attitude towards mental Illness. The evaluative associative processing parameter A for the "acceptance group" of college students was not significantly different from 0.5 (χ2(1)=1.202, p=0.273), while the A parameter for the "stigma group" of college students was significantly less than 0.5 (χ2(1)=3.888, p<0.05), indicating that the acceptance group subjects held a neutral implicit attitude towards mental Illness patients, while the stigma group subjects held a negative implicit attitude. Conclusion: College students exhibit both explicit and implicit stigma towards mental illness. Over 60% of the participants showed a tendency for explicit stigma, with the most prominent issue being discriminatory behavior towards individuals with mental illness, followed by negative perceptions of mental illness. College students with neutral implicit beliefs tended to display accepting explicit attitudes, whereas those with implicit stigma tended to show stigmatizing explicit attitudes.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Mental Illness Stigma Research Based on the Quad Model and ReAL Model: From Personal-centered Perspective
Description:
Abstract Background:Currently, there remain some ambiguities in the research on mental illness stigma.
One issue is that studies on the relationship between explicit and implicit stigmas of mental illness are divided into two camps: the high-correlation theory, which suggests a unity between the two, and the low-correlation theory, which advocates for their separation.
Another issue is the "relativity" of the results from Implicit Association Tests (IATs), which has led to controversy over research conclusions.
Methods:A total of 62 college students were recruited as volunteers to participate in the study, which employed a range of psychological scales, including emotional scales, social distance scales, and stereotype scales.
The explicit attitudes of the participants toward mental illness were examined through latent profile analysis, while the implicit attitudes were assessed using Implicit Association Tests(IAT), analyzed based on the quad model and the ReAL model.
Additionally, the study explored the relationship between explicit and implicit attitudes toward mental illness.
Results:Based on the heterogeneity in college students' explicit attitudes toward mental illness, they could be divided into two subgroups, named "Acceptance Group" (39.
66%) and "Stigma Group" (60.
34%), respectively.
The "mental Illness patients - negative" automatic activation parameter (AC, Quad model, χ2(1)=28.
807, p<0.
001) and the evaluative associative processing parameter for mental Illness patients (A, ReAL model, χ2(1)=10.
826, p<0.
01) reached significance, both indicating that college students have a significant negative implicit attitude towards mental Illness.
The evaluative associative processing parameter A for the "acceptance group" of college students was not significantly different from 0.
5 (χ2(1)=1.
202, p=0.
273), while the A parameter for the "stigma group" of college students was significantly less than 0.
5 (χ2(1)=3.
888, p<0.
05), indicating that the acceptance group subjects held a neutral implicit attitude towards mental Illness patients, while the stigma group subjects held a negative implicit attitude.
Conclusion: College students exhibit both explicit and implicit stigma towards mental illness.
Over 60% of the participants showed a tendency for explicit stigma, with the most prominent issue being discriminatory behavior towards individuals with mental illness, followed by negative perceptions of mental illness.
College students with neutral implicit beliefs tended to display accepting explicit attitudes, whereas those with implicit stigma tended to show stigmatizing explicit attitudes.

Related Results

Blogging Illness: Recovering in Public
Blogging Illness: Recovering in Public
As a mode of open access public self-expression, blogs are one form of the unfolding massification of culture (Lovink). Though widely varied in content and style, they are characte...
Woningcorporaties en Vastgoedontwikkeling
Woningcorporaties en Vastgoedontwikkeling
This summary highlights the findings of the PhD-thesis ‘Woningcorporaties en Vastgoedontwikkeling: Fit for Use’ (‘Housing associations and Real Estate Development: Fit for Use?’). ...
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
1 INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 5 -- 2 GENERAL BACKGROUND: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7 -- 2.1 CHRONIC AND COMPLEX MENTAL DISORDERS: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE -- S...
Alteration
Alteration
\r Mental illness is surprisingly far more common than people care to believe. This is in part due to the stigma which follows close behind it. Stigma, a mark of disgrace, began be...
<b>Stigma Toward Mental Illness Among Healthcare Professionals In A Tertiary Care Hospital </b>
<b>Stigma Toward Mental Illness Among Healthcare Professionals In A Tertiary Care Hospital </b>
Received: 16-06-2026 Revised: 20-06-2026 Accepted: 23-06-2026 Introduction:Stigma toward mental illness among healthcare professionals remains a significant barrier to equitable an...
Stigma Kills
Stigma Kills
Stigma due to an HIV diagnosis is a well-known phenomenon and is a major barrier to accessing care.1Over the last forty years, HIV has been transformed from a fatal disease to a ma...
Predictors of personal, perceived and self-stigma towards anxiety and depression
Predictors of personal, perceived and self-stigma towards anxiety and depression
BackgroundStigma towards individuals experiencing a mental illness is associated with a range of negative psychological, social and financial outcomes. Factors associated with stig...
Stigma Masyarakat Terhadap Gangguan Jiwa: Literature Review
Stigma Masyarakat Terhadap Gangguan Jiwa: Literature Review
AbstractMental disorders are disorders that occur in the brain which are characterized by distrurbed behavior, thinking processes, emotions, and perceptions. The stigma attached to...

Back to Top