Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A 20-month longitudinal study to evaluate humoral and cellular immunity after COVID-19 vaccines
View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines is well established; however, the long-term durability of vaccine-induced immunity remains to be fully elucidated. OBJECTIVES This study longitudinally compared humoral and cellular immune responses in two groups: G1, who received two doses of Sinovac-CoronaVac, and G2, who received two doses of AstraZeneca-Oxford, both subsequently boosted with Pfizer. METHODS Immune responses were assessed at five time points: P1 (prior to the second dose), P2 (90-180 days after the second dose), P3 (pre-booster, six-eight months post-second dose), P4 (90-180 days post-booster), and P5 (180-270 days post-booster). Anti-Spike severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), while IFNγ-producing cells in response to Spike peptides were quantified using enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISPOT). IgG subclasses were analysed in a subset of samples. RESULTS Following the first dose, Sinovac-CoronaVac induced lower anti-Spike IgG levels than AstraZeneca-Oxford, though levels equalised after the second dose. After the Pfizer booster, anti-Spike IgG levels remained elevated for up to six months in both groups. IgG1 was predominant in both groups, with occasional expression of IgG2 and IgG4. The mean frequency of IFNγ-producing cells was lower in the Sinovac-CoronaVac group before and up to six months after the second dose, compared to AstraZeneca-Oxford. However, post-Pfizer booster, both means became comparable. Between 90-180 days post-booster, the Sinovac-CoronaVac + Pfizer group exhibited a statistically significant decline in IFNγ-producing cells relative to the AstraZeneca-Oxford + Pfizer group. By P5, over half of individuals in the Sinovac-CoronaVac + Pfizer group demonstrated no detectable cellular response. MAIN CONCLUSIONS High antibody levels were maintained for up to six months following both homologous and heterologous vaccination. However, cellular immunity declined more markedly in the Sinovac-CoronaVac + Pfizer group, resulting in a higher proportion of non-responders. These findings underscore the importance of tailored booster strategies to sustain protective immunity against COVID-19.
Title: A 20-month longitudinal study to evaluate humoral and cellular immunity after COVID-19 vaccines
Description:
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines is well established; however, the long-term durability of vaccine-induced immunity remains to be fully elucidated.
OBJECTIVES This study longitudinally compared humoral and cellular immune responses in two groups: G1, who received two doses of Sinovac-CoronaVac, and G2, who received two doses of AstraZeneca-Oxford, both subsequently boosted with Pfizer.
METHODS Immune responses were assessed at five time points: P1 (prior to the second dose), P2 (90-180 days after the second dose), P3 (pre-booster, six-eight months post-second dose), P4 (90-180 days post-booster), and P5 (180-270 days post-booster).
Anti-Spike severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), while IFNγ-producing cells in response to Spike peptides were quantified using enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISPOT).
IgG subclasses were analysed in a subset of samples.
RESULTS Following the first dose, Sinovac-CoronaVac induced lower anti-Spike IgG levels than AstraZeneca-Oxford, though levels equalised after the second dose.
After the Pfizer booster, anti-Spike IgG levels remained elevated for up to six months in both groups.
IgG1 was predominant in both groups, with occasional expression of IgG2 and IgG4.
The mean frequency of IFNγ-producing cells was lower in the Sinovac-CoronaVac group before and up to six months after the second dose, compared to AstraZeneca-Oxford.
However, post-Pfizer booster, both means became comparable.
Between 90-180 days post-booster, the Sinovac-CoronaVac + Pfizer group exhibited a statistically significant decline in IFNγ-producing cells relative to the AstraZeneca-Oxford + Pfizer group.
By P5, over half of individuals in the Sinovac-CoronaVac + Pfizer group demonstrated no detectable cellular response.
MAIN CONCLUSIONS High antibody levels were maintained for up to six months following both homologous and heterologous vaccination.
However, cellular immunity declined more markedly in the Sinovac-CoronaVac + Pfizer group, resulting in a higher proportion of non-responders.
These findings underscore the importance of tailored booster strategies to sustain protective immunity against COVID-19.
Related Results
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Effectiveness and Durability of mRNA Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2-Specific Humoral and Cellular Immunity in Severe Asthma Patients on Biological Therapy
Effectiveness and Durability of mRNA Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2-Specific Humoral and Cellular Immunity in Severe Asthma Patients on Biological Therapy
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines effectively elicit humoral and cellular immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in healthy popula...
Effectiveness and durability of the mRNA vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity in severe asthma patients on biological therapy
Effectiveness and durability of the mRNA vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity in severe asthma patients on biological therapy
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 vaccines effectively elicit humoral and cellular immunity against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a health...
Immunization against COVID-19: A Comprehensive Review on the
Leading Vaccines
Immunization against COVID-19: A Comprehensive Review on the
Leading Vaccines
Abstract:
The global impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has prompted researchers and scientists
to develop effective vaccines to contain the spread of the pandemic. This has ...
1940. COVID-19 Vaccines and Related Adverse Effects among Health Sciences and Non-Health Sciences Students from Two Large Public Universities in Thailand
1940. COVID-19 Vaccines and Related Adverse Effects among Health Sciences and Non-Health Sciences Students from Two Large Public Universities in Thailand
Abstract
Background
Existing data on vaccine regimens received by university students and related adverse effects are limited.
...
Vaccine Types
Vaccine Types
Vaccines are biological preparations, often made from attenuated or killed forms of microorganisms or fractions thereof.
They work by stimulating the immune system to produce anti...

