Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Subperiosteal tunnel assisted graft (STAG) technique: Report of two cases

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background This case report describes the clinical application of the subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique, a novel approach for peri‐implant phenotype modification and keratinized tissue augmentation. Although free gingival grafts remain the gold standard for increasing keratinized tissue width, their effectiveness may be compromised by postoperative graft shrinkage or partial graft loss, often resulting from limited vascular supply, inadequate adaptation to the recipient bed, and insufficient graft stability—particularly in posterior regions or sites with shallow vestibules where surgical access and tension control are more challenging. Methods The STAG technique was developed to overcome these limitations through the creation of a subperiosteal tunnel that enables bilateral graft insertion and stabilization using lasso sutures at both ends of the graft. This approach facilitates simultaneous augmentation of keratinized tissue, vestibular depth, and soft tissue thickness while minimizing graft mobility and enhancing adaptation to the recipient site. Results The presented cases demonstrated successful augmentation of keratinized mucosa and vestibular depth, along with increased peri‐implant mucosal thickness and stable soft tissue integration at the treated sites. Conclusion The STAG technique may provide a predictable approach for the management of complex peri‐implant mucogingival deficiencies and peri‐implant phenotype enhancement. Key points Subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique offers a predictable alternative to conventional free gingival grafts for peri‐implant mucosal augmentation. By maintaining close adaptation between the donor graft and recipient bed, the STAG approach enhances vascular integration and reduces the risk of graft contraction or failure. This method enables peri‐implant mucosa phenotype modification therapy, including mucosal thickness gain, keratinized mucosa gain, vestibular depth, and frenum pull elimination in a single procedure, optimizing both function and patient comfort. Plain language summary The subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique provides a predictable and effective alternative to conventional free gingival graft by enabling superior graft adaptation between the donor tissue and recipient bed.
Title: Subperiosteal tunnel assisted graft (STAG) technique: Report of two cases
Description:
Abstract Background This case report describes the clinical application of the subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique, a novel approach for peri‐implant phenotype modification and keratinized tissue augmentation.
Although free gingival grafts remain the gold standard for increasing keratinized tissue width, their effectiveness may be compromised by postoperative graft shrinkage or partial graft loss, often resulting from limited vascular supply, inadequate adaptation to the recipient bed, and insufficient graft stability—particularly in posterior regions or sites with shallow vestibules where surgical access and tension control are more challenging.
Methods The STAG technique was developed to overcome these limitations through the creation of a subperiosteal tunnel that enables bilateral graft insertion and stabilization using lasso sutures at both ends of the graft.
This approach facilitates simultaneous augmentation of keratinized tissue, vestibular depth, and soft tissue thickness while minimizing graft mobility and enhancing adaptation to the recipient site.
Results The presented cases demonstrated successful augmentation of keratinized mucosa and vestibular depth, along with increased peri‐implant mucosal thickness and stable soft tissue integration at the treated sites.
Conclusion The STAG technique may provide a predictable approach for the management of complex peri‐implant mucogingival deficiencies and peri‐implant phenotype enhancement.
Key points Subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique offers a predictable alternative to conventional free gingival grafts for peri‐implant mucosal augmentation.
By maintaining close adaptation between the donor graft and recipient bed, the STAG approach enhances vascular integration and reduces the risk of graft contraction or failure.
This method enables peri‐implant mucosa phenotype modification therapy, including mucosal thickness gain, keratinized mucosa gain, vestibular depth, and frenum pull elimination in a single procedure, optimizing both function and patient comfort.
Plain language summary The subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique provides a predictable and effective alternative to conventional free gingival graft by enabling superior graft adaptation between the donor tissue and recipient bed.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Construction time of secondary lining of ultra-small spacing parallel overlapping tunnel
Construction time of secondary lining of ultra-small spacing parallel overlapping tunnel
Abstract Due to the unique spatial structure, stress transfer mechanism, and construction disturbance characteristics of ultra-small spacing parallel overlapping tu...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
Outcome analysis of Adjustable Loop Device for ACL femoral fixation
Outcome analysis of Adjustable Loop Device for ACL femoral fixation
Background: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is commonly performed to restore knee stability after ACL rupture. Femoral graft fixation remains a critical fact...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Abstarct Introduction Orbital hydatid cysts (HCs) constitute less than 1% of all cases of hydatidosis, yet their occurrence is often linked to severe visual complications. This stu...

Back to Top