Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The OttomanBeratsof the Greek Orthodox Patrirach of Jerusalem (1872–1931)

View through CrossRef
Ottoman Berats (charters11 The authors prefer to use the term Berat, a Turkish expression which is also used extensively in the literature. The term ‘charter’ has more institutional meaning and since each Patriarch received its own specific Berat so the word charter does not give the full meaning. ) were official documents issued by Sultans delineating the tasks, powers, exemptions and concessions granted to Greek Orthodox Patriarchs to be the applicable within the jurisdiction of the Patriarchs. The Berat also showed that the Patriarch was elected by the Synod and approved by the Sultan. A Patriarch who did not have Berat could not perform his duties or exercise executive authority. This article critically examines the Berats of the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem in the period 1873–1931. These Berats are analysed in terms of their contents as well as in connection to the way non-Muslims were subject to rules which applied to the domestic relations of the Greek Orthodox community and to public law areas which came within the scope of Sharia law.
Title: The OttomanBeratsof the Greek Orthodox Patrirach of Jerusalem (1872–1931)
Description:
Ottoman Berats (charters11 The authors prefer to use the term Berat, a Turkish expression which is also used extensively in the literature.
The term ‘charter’ has more institutional meaning and since each Patriarch received its own specific Berat so the word charter does not give the full meaning.
) were official documents issued by Sultans delineating the tasks, powers, exemptions and concessions granted to Greek Orthodox Patriarchs to be the applicable within the jurisdiction of the Patriarchs.
The Berat also showed that the Patriarch was elected by the Synod and approved by the Sultan.
A Patriarch who did not have Berat could not perform his duties or exercise executive authority.
This article critically examines the Berats of the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem in the period 1873–1931.
These Berats are analysed in terms of their contents as well as in connection to the way non-Muslims were subject to rules which applied to the domestic relations of the Greek Orthodox community and to public law areas which came within the scope of Sharia law.

Related Results

Jerusalem
Jerusalem
Jerusalem is the most important location in the Bible and the most researched within the realm of biblical studies. Already a Canaanite city of some standing by the Middle Bronze A...
Views of Parents and Guardians on Orthodox Christian Education in Greek Schools
Views of Parents and Guardians on Orthodox Christian Education in Greek Schools
In a period of intense theological ferment, where social and political changes have shaped a transitional period for the teaching of the RE in the Greek school, the present study, ...
Op zoek naar gemeenschappelijke grond. De gesprekken tussen Pax Christi Internationaal en de russisch-orthodoxe kerk
Op zoek naar gemeenschappelijke grond. De gesprekken tussen Pax Christi Internationaal en de russisch-orthodoxe kerk
In search of common ground The dialogue between Pax Christi International and the Russian Orthodox Church Pax Christi believes that frontiers may divide states, but not Churches ba...
A Parallax View on Eastern Orthodox Aesthetics: From the Ethos of Liturgical Art to Dionysis Savvopoulos’ Aesthetic Eschatology
A Parallax View on Eastern Orthodox Aesthetics: From the Ethos of Liturgical Art to Dionysis Savvopoulos’ Aesthetic Eschatology
This study explores Eastern Orthodox aesthetics through a parallax lens, situating it at the intersection of theology, anthropology, and cultural practice to move beyond the icon-c...
Jerusalem
Jerusalem
Jerusalem has been the focus of much study by international lawyers and political scientists. That body of literature dates only from the late 1940s, when a proposal to recommend t...
Forgotten Jerusalem
Forgotten Jerusalem
Chapter 2 turns toward modern social memory—via the injunction against forgetting Jerusalem in Judaism (Psalm 137)—during the Yishuv era (1882–1948), when Jerusalem appears to have...
Musical hybridity through Greek diaspora: in the case of Calliope Tsoupaki and Yannis Kyriakides
Musical hybridity through Greek diaspora: in the case of Calliope Tsoupaki and Yannis Kyriakides
<p>This research explores the influence of Greek history and diaspora and its impact on Greece and the progression of Greek popular musical styles – traditional, folk, and re...

Back to Top