Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Exploring arXiv usage habits among Slovenian scientists
View through CrossRef
PurposeThis study investigates how important the preprint arXiv is for Slovenian scientists, whether there are differences between scientific disciplines and the reputation of arXiv among Slovenian scientists. We are also interested in what advantages and disadvantages scientists see in using arXiv.Design/methodology/approachA voluntary sample of active researchers from the scientific fields covered by arXiv was used. Data were collected over 21 days in September 2021 using a 40-question online survey. In addition to descriptive statistics, nonparametric statistical methods such as Pearson's chi-squared test for independence, Kruskal-Wallis' H-test and Mann-Whitney's U-test were applied to the collected data.FindingsAmong Slovenian scientists there is a wide range of different users of arXiv. The authors note differences among scientific disciplines. Physicists and astronomers are the most engaged, followed by mathematicians. Researchers in computer science, electrical engineering and systems science seem to have recognized the benefits of the archive, but are still hesitant to use it. Researchers from the other scientific fields participated in the survey to a lesser extent, suggesting that arXiv is less popular in these scientific fields. For Slovenian scientists, the main advantages of arXiv are faster access to knowledge, open access, greater impact of scientists' work and the fact that publishing in the archive is free of charge. A negative aspect of using the archive is the frustration caused by the difficulties in assessing the credibility of articles.Research limitations/implicationsA voluntary sample was used, which attracted a larger number of researchers but has a higher risk of sampling bias.Practical implicationsThe results are useful for international comparisons, but also provide bases and recommendations for institutional and national policies to evaluate researchers and their performance.Originality/valueThe results provide valuable insights into arXiv usage habits and the reasons for using or not using arXiv by Slovenian scientists. There is no comparable study conducted in Slovenia.
Title: Exploring arXiv usage habits among Slovenian scientists
Description:
PurposeThis study investigates how important the preprint arXiv is for Slovenian scientists, whether there are differences between scientific disciplines and the reputation of arXiv among Slovenian scientists.
We are also interested in what advantages and disadvantages scientists see in using arXiv.
Design/methodology/approachA voluntary sample of active researchers from the scientific fields covered by arXiv was used.
Data were collected over 21 days in September 2021 using a 40-question online survey.
In addition to descriptive statistics, nonparametric statistical methods such as Pearson's chi-squared test for independence, Kruskal-Wallis' H-test and Mann-Whitney's U-test were applied to the collected data.
FindingsAmong Slovenian scientists there is a wide range of different users of arXiv.
The authors note differences among scientific disciplines.
Physicists and astronomers are the most engaged, followed by mathematicians.
Researchers in computer science, electrical engineering and systems science seem to have recognized the benefits of the archive, but are still hesitant to use it.
Researchers from the other scientific fields participated in the survey to a lesser extent, suggesting that arXiv is less popular in these scientific fields.
For Slovenian scientists, the main advantages of arXiv are faster access to knowledge, open access, greater impact of scientists' work and the fact that publishing in the archive is free of charge.
A negative aspect of using the archive is the frustration caused by the difficulties in assessing the credibility of articles.
Research limitations/implicationsA voluntary sample was used, which attracted a larger number of researchers but has a higher risk of sampling bias.
Practical implicationsThe results are useful for international comparisons, but also provide bases and recommendations for institutional and national policies to evaluate researchers and their performance.
Originality/valueThe results provide valuable insights into arXiv usage habits and the reasons for using or not using arXiv by Slovenian scientists.
There is no comparable study conducted in Slovenia.
Related Results
CONTEMPORARY MILITARY CHALLENGES IN ENGLISH – A PROBLEM OR AN OPPORTUNITY
CONTEMPORARY MILITARY CHALLENGES IN ENGLISH – A PROBLEM OR AN OPPORTUNITY
Dear readers,You are looking at a new edition of the Contemporary Military Challenges, which includes contributions by the authors employed in Slovenian defence system; all except ...
Janko Kersnik
Janko Kersnik
Janko Kersnik (1852–1897) was involved in various fields: as a notary (briefly as an attorney), in economics and finance (property management, farming, forestry, hunting, etc.), in...
Macroeconomic and Social Precursors of Suicide Rates in the Philippines: A Quantitative Analysis (Preprint)
Macroeconomic and Social Precursors of Suicide Rates in the Philippines: A Quantitative Analysis (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Suicide is a complex, serious and multifaceted public health issue that poses significant challenges to societies worldwide. In fact, it represen...
BHTOM: The Power of Many
BHTOM: The Power of Many
Time-domain astronomy, driven by the current wide-field surveys such as ATLAS (Tonry et al., 2018), Pan-STARRS (Chambers et al., 2016) and ZTF (Bellm et al., 2019) has become essen...
Somatic health and lifestyle habits in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Somatic health and lifestyle habits in obsessive-compulsive disorder
<p dir="ltr">Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating psychiatric disorder characterized by intrusive thoughts, images, or urges (i.e., obsessions) a...
arXiv.org and Physics Education
arXiv.org and Physics Education
The website arXiv.org (pronounced archive) is a free online resource for full-text articles in the fields of physics, mathematics, computer science, nonlinear science, and quantita...
20 YEARS OF CONTEMPORARY MILITARY CHALLENGES
20 YEARS OF CONTEMPORARY MILITARY CHALLENGES
Reading the title of this editorial, many might think that Contemporary Military Challenges have not been published for so many years, and that before there was another publication...
Public engagement of scientists (Science Communication)
Public engagement of scientists (Science Communication)
Public engagement of scientists is defined as “all kinds of publicly accessible communication carried out by people presenting themselves as scientists. This includes scholarly com...

