Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Systemic therapy for patients with breast cancer and one to three brain metastases (BM).
View through CrossRef
1090 Background: Despite advances in systemic therapies and improved overall survival of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, the development of brain metastases (BMs) remains a challenging complication that affects quality of life and increases morbidity and mortality. Current clinical practice guidelines recommend local treatment of BMs without changing systemic therapy (CST) in patients with stable systemic disease. Methods: We retrospectively investigated the impact of CST (when applicable as per treating physician’s discretion) after diagnosis of the initial 1-3 BMs on the patient’s progression-free survival time (PFS), defined as time to death, to a second BMs or to extracranial metastases. All MBC patients with 1 to 3 BMs only (without extracranial disease) treated at our institution between 2002 and 2017 were identified. For each patient, full information on follow-up and administered therapies were mandatory for inclusion. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. We also computed the restricted mean survival time (RMST) up to 5 years of follow-up. Results: Among the 2645 patient with BM treated at our institution, 80 were included for analysis. In regards to primary BMs management in patients, 46 of 80 (57%) were treated by radiation therapy, 6 of 80 (7.5%) underwent surgical resection, and 28 of 80 (35%) were managed by a combination of surgery and radiation therapy. All patients had staging imaging documenting lack of extracranial metastases at the time of local therapy of BMs. Following the primary management of BM, we observed that providers changed systemic therapy in 32 of 80 (40%), defined as the CST group. CST included both initiation of therapy in 16 of 80 (20%) and switching of adjuvant therapy in 16 of 80 (20%). Median PFS among CST was 7.7 months vs. 7.2 months among no CST (HR = 0.855, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-1.38, p = 0.52). 5-year RMST for the CST group was 16.6 months vs. 12.8 months in no CST group. The difference of 3.8 months (95% CI 4.3-11.8) was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Patients with 1-3 BMs without extracranial disease had a median PFS close to 7.5 months after local therapy. Consistent with current standard of care of maintaining the same systemic therapy approach upon developing isolated BMs, our findings did not demonstrate a significant difference in PFS between patients who experienced a change in systemic therapy compared to those who did not.
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Systemic therapy for patients with breast cancer and one to three brain metastases (BM).
Description:
1090 Background: Despite advances in systemic therapies and improved overall survival of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, the development of brain metastases (BMs) remains a challenging complication that affects quality of life and increases morbidity and mortality.
Current clinical practice guidelines recommend local treatment of BMs without changing systemic therapy (CST) in patients with stable systemic disease.
Methods: We retrospectively investigated the impact of CST (when applicable as per treating physician’s discretion) after diagnosis of the initial 1-3 BMs on the patient’s progression-free survival time (PFS), defined as time to death, to a second BMs or to extracranial metastases.
All MBC patients with 1 to 3 BMs only (without extracranial disease) treated at our institution between 2002 and 2017 were identified.
For each patient, full information on follow-up and administered therapies were mandatory for inclusion.
Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model.
We also computed the restricted mean survival time (RMST) up to 5 years of follow-up.
Results: Among the 2645 patient with BM treated at our institution, 80 were included for analysis.
In regards to primary BMs management in patients, 46 of 80 (57%) were treated by radiation therapy, 6 of 80 (7.
5%) underwent surgical resection, and 28 of 80 (35%) were managed by a combination of surgery and radiation therapy.
All patients had staging imaging documenting lack of extracranial metastases at the time of local therapy of BMs.
Following the primary management of BM, we observed that providers changed systemic therapy in 32 of 80 (40%), defined as the CST group.
CST included both initiation of therapy in 16 of 80 (20%) and switching of adjuvant therapy in 16 of 80 (20%).
Median PFS among CST was 7.
7 months vs.
7.
2 months among no CST (HR = 0.
855, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.
53-1.
38, p = 0.
52).
5-year RMST for the CST group was 16.
6 months vs.
12.
8 months in no CST group.
The difference of 3.
8 months (95% CI 4.
3-11.
8) was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Patients with 1-3 BMs without extracranial disease had a median PFS close to 7.
5 months after local therapy.
Consistent with current standard of care of maintaining the same systemic therapy approach upon developing isolated BMs, our findings did not demonstrate a significant difference in PFS between patients who experienced a change in systemic therapy compared to those who did not.
Related Results
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract
IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Photo by Maxim Berg on Unsplash
INTRODUCTION
The brain is one of the most foundational parts of being human, and we are still learning about what makes humans unique. Advancements ...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract
Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. This risk i...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...

