Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Effect of Export on R&D Cost Behavior: Evidence from Korea

View through CrossRef
Purpose - This research intends to find out whether R&D cost stickiness shows differentiated aspects depending on exports in Korea. A cost behavior that indicates a lower rate of costs decrease when sales decrease than the rate of costs increase when sales increase is called cost stickiness. This sticky cost behavior is caused by considering the adjusting costs. This study aims to empirically verify that R&D cost stickiness is greater in export firms than in non-export firms. We also investigate the effect of exports on R&D cost stickiness is nonlinear. Design/methodology - We obtain data for the analysis from Kis-Value and TS2000 from 2012 to 2020. This study tests for R&D cost stickiness of exports using the cost stickiness model developed by Anderson et al. (2003) that is used in a lot of prior literature. To explore the nonlinear behavior of R&D cost stickiness we include a quadratic term of exports in our model. Findings - The results of our analysis are as follows. First, we observed that R&D costs of export firms are more sticky than that of non-export firms. Our result indicated that export firms are less likely to reduce R&D costs in decreasing sales periods in preparation for future sales recovery. Second, our empirical evidence shows that export firms view R&D costs much favorably. However, we hypothesize that the effect of export intensity on R&D costs may not necessarily be linear. Our result shows the effect of exports intensity on R&D stickiness is thus nonlinear, forming a reverse U-shaped curve. When export intensity exceeds a certain threshold, the growth rate of R&D costs appears to be viewed negatively. Firms with relatively high export intensity do not support R&D costs, viewing them as taking away firms’ resources from other more productive costs. On the contrary, those with export intensity under the threshold view R&D costs as beneficial and therefore promote further R&D costs when revenue decreases. Originality/value - The results of this research can contribute academically to the expansion of empirical research on R&D cost stickiness. R&D cost stickiness varies by industry. As a result of our research, the managers of export firms recognize the importance of R&D to lead innovation. We expected that this research contributes to further studies on R&D costs and cost stickiness. Second, this research has implications from a business perspectives. Our findings of export firms’ R&D stickiness suggest that export firms’ managers should consider keeping the stickiness of R&D when revenue decreases because it is essential for exporting firms to maintain their R&D stickiness to secure longterm competitiveness. R&D stickiness can be used on a practical basis to emphasize the need for continuous investment in exporting firms’ R&D activities.
Title: The Effect of Export on R&D Cost Behavior: Evidence from Korea
Description:
Purpose - This research intends to find out whether R&D cost stickiness shows differentiated aspects depending on exports in Korea.
A cost behavior that indicates a lower rate of costs decrease when sales decrease than the rate of costs increase when sales increase is called cost stickiness.
This sticky cost behavior is caused by considering the adjusting costs.
This study aims to empirically verify that R&D cost stickiness is greater in export firms than in non-export firms.
We also investigate the effect of exports on R&D cost stickiness is nonlinear.
Design/methodology - We obtain data for the analysis from Kis-Value and TS2000 from 2012 to 2020.
This study tests for R&D cost stickiness of exports using the cost stickiness model developed by Anderson et al.
(2003) that is used in a lot of prior literature.
To explore the nonlinear behavior of R&D cost stickiness we include a quadratic term of exports in our model.
Findings - The results of our analysis are as follows.
First, we observed that R&D costs of export firms are more sticky than that of non-export firms.
Our result indicated that export firms are less likely to reduce R&D costs in decreasing sales periods in preparation for future sales recovery.
Second, our empirical evidence shows that export firms view R&D costs much favorably.
However, we hypothesize that the effect of export intensity on R&D costs may not necessarily be linear.
Our result shows the effect of exports intensity on R&D stickiness is thus nonlinear, forming a reverse U-shaped curve.
When export intensity exceeds a certain threshold, the growth rate of R&D costs appears to be viewed negatively.
Firms with relatively high export intensity do not support R&D costs, viewing them as taking away firms’ resources from other more productive costs.
On the contrary, those with export intensity under the threshold view R&D costs as beneficial and therefore promote further R&D costs when revenue decreases.
Originality/value - The results of this research can contribute academically to the expansion of empirical research on R&D cost stickiness.
R&D cost stickiness varies by industry.
As a result of our research, the managers of export firms recognize the importance of R&D to lead innovation.
We expected that this research contributes to further studies on R&D costs and cost stickiness.
Second, this research has implications from a business perspectives.
Our findings of export firms’ R&D stickiness suggest that export firms’ managers should consider keeping the stickiness of R&D when revenue decreases because it is essential for exporting firms to maintain their R&D stickiness to secure longterm competitiveness.
R&D stickiness can be used on a practical basis to emphasize the need for continuous investment in exporting firms’ R&D activities.

Related Results

L᾽«unilinguisme» officiel de Constantinople byzantine (VIIe-XIIe s.)
L᾽«unilinguisme» officiel de Constantinople byzantine (VIIe-XIIe s.)
&nbsp; <p>&Nu;ί&kappa;&omicron;&sigmaf; &Omicron;&iota;&kappa;&omicron;&nu;&omicron;&mu;ί&delta;&eta;&sigmaf;</...
Global Value Chain and Misallocation: Evidence from South Korea
Global Value Chain and Misallocation: Evidence from South Korea
Purpose - This paper empirically investigates the effect of a rise in the global value chain (GVC) on the industry-level efficiency of resource allocation (based on plant-level ine...
Has the FTA Promoted Trade? Empirical Evidence from Korea
Has the FTA Promoted Trade? Empirical Evidence from Korea
Purpose - This study aims to analyze how the FTAs concluded by Korea over the past 20 years have affected Korea’s trade. Design/methodology/approach - Using the gravity model...
Comparison of International Competitiveness of Digital Services Trade between Korea and China
Comparison of International Competitiveness of Digital Services Trade between Korea and China
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare the international competitiveness of digital service trade between Korea and China and to help enhance the competitive...
In Defense of North Korea Sanctions
In Defense of North Korea Sanctions
South Korean President Moon Jae-In's administration has sought sanctions relief for North Korea, but South Korea's allies have rejected those solicitations. This paper formalizes t...
Korea-KOSCO Oil Agreement, September 1949
Korea-KOSCO Oil Agreement, September 1949
In September 1949, the Korean government signed a toal of four oil agreements with foreign oil companies. This article specifically analyzes one of those agreement, the Agreement B...
US-Korea Oil Agreement, January 1949: Character and Significance
US-Korea Oil Agreement, January 1949: Character and Significance
In 1949, the Korean government signed six oil agreements. This article details the negotiation process of the Agreement between the Republic of Korea, the United States, and Korea ...

Back to Top