Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Origins of the Mach–Poincaré Principle
View through CrossRef
The problem with the definition of inertia was solved, in the simple case of free point particles, by Tait, who introduced the concept of inertial frame. Tait’s solution would have satisfied Leibniz’ request that inertia be determined dynamically, however it only works in the absence of interactions between the material bodies. Later Mach posed again the question of the origin of inertia, suggesting the idea that it should be dynamical, which was later dubbed ‘Mach’s principle’. Moreover Mach criticized also Newton’s absolute time, and introduced the basic idea of temporal relationalism, i.e. that time should be a concept that is abstracted from change and has no independent existence. This idea is at the basis of SD and many other relational approaches to physics. This chapter concludes with the Barbour–Bertotti formulation of Mach’s principle, which they called ‘Mach–Poincaré Principle’. This formulation removes the vagueness of Mach’s original idea, and puts the principle into a precise mathematical form, which is one of the basic axioms of SD.
Title: Origins of the Mach–Poincaré Principle
Description:
The problem with the definition of inertia was solved, in the simple case of free point particles, by Tait, who introduced the concept of inertial frame.
Tait’s solution would have satisfied Leibniz’ request that inertia be determined dynamically, however it only works in the absence of interactions between the material bodies.
Later Mach posed again the question of the origin of inertia, suggesting the idea that it should be dynamical, which was later dubbed ‘Mach’s principle’.
Moreover Mach criticized also Newton’s absolute time, and introduced the basic idea of temporal relationalism, i.
e.
that time should be a concept that is abstracted from change and has no independent existence.
This idea is at the basis of SD and many other relational approaches to physics.
This chapter concludes with the Barbour–Bertotti formulation of Mach’s principle, which they called ‘Mach–Poincaré Principle’.
This formulation removes the vagueness of Mach’s original idea, and puts the principle into a precise mathematical form, which is one of the basic axioms of SD.
Related Results
Barbour–Bertotti Best Matching
Barbour–Bertotti Best Matching
Barbour and Bertotti’s Mach–Poincaré Principle can be realized in classical mechanics with a mathematical procedure which was beyond the grasp of Leibniz or Newton, and turns out t...
Topological Invariants and Differential Geometry
Topological Invariants and Differential Geometry
This chapter deals with topological invariants and differential geometry. It first considers a topological space X for which singular homology and cohomology are defined, along wit...
The EU Principle of Subsidiarity and its Critique
The EU Principle of Subsidiarity and its Critique
Abstract
The aim of this work is two-fold. First it attempts to construct a more solid critique of the European Union principle of subsidiarity. Second it tries t...
Moral Responsibility and the Flicker of Freedom
Moral Responsibility and the Flicker of Freedom
Abstract
This book addresses a long-standing controversy in the literature on free will and moral responsibility concerning whether Frankfurt cases—thought experimen...
Distributive Autonomy
Distributive Autonomy
This chapter first explores the logical imperative that if autonomy is valuable for all, there must be rights for each person to have at least some baseline of autonomy. This basel...
Analytical Mechanics
Analytical Mechanics
Abstract
Analytical Mechanics is the investigation of motion with the rigorous tools of mathematics. Rooted in the works of Lagrange, Euler, Poincaré (to mention ...
Mongols in the Tarikh-i Rashidi
Mongols in the Tarikh-i Rashidi
This chapter will continue to investigate Central Asia by showing how the Mongol prince Mirza Haydar Dughlat (d. 1551) ruminated wistfully about his Mongol origins nostalgically as...

