Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Randomized clinical trial of postoperative chewing gum versus standard care after colorectal resection
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Chewing gum may stimulate gastrointestinal motility, with beneficial effects on postoperative ileus suggested in small studies. The primary aim of this trial was to determine whether chewing gum reduces length of hospital stay (LOS) after colorectal resection. Secondary aims included examining bowel habit symptoms, complications and healthcare costs.
Methods
This clinical trial allocated patients randomly to standard postoperative care with or without chewing gum (sugar-free gum for at least 10 min, four times per day on days 1–5) in five UK hospitals. The primary outcome was LOS. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios for LOS.
Results
Data from 402 of 412 patients, of whom 199 (49·5 per cent) were allocated to chewing gum, were available for analysis. Some 40 per cent of patients in both groups had laparoscopic surgery, and all study sites used enhanced recovery programmes. Median (i.q.r.) LOS was 7 (5–11) days in both groups (P = 0·962); the hazard ratio for use of gum was 0·94 (95 per cent c.i. 0·77 to 1·15; P = 0·557). Participants allocated to gum had worse quality of life, measured using the EuroQoL 5D-3L, than controls at 6 and 12 weeks after operation (but not on day 4). They also had more complications graded III or above according to the Dindo–Demartines–Clavien classification (16 versus 6 in the group that received standard care) and deaths (11 versus 0), but none was classed as related to gum. No other differences were observed.
Conclusion
Chewing gum did not alter the return of bowel function or LOS after colorectal resection. Registration number: ISRCTN55784442 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Randomized clinical trial of postoperative chewing gum versus standard care after colorectal resection
Description:
Abstract
Background
Chewing gum may stimulate gastrointestinal motility, with beneficial effects on postoperative ileus suggested in small studies.
The primary aim of this trial was to determine whether chewing gum reduces length of hospital stay (LOS) after colorectal resection.
Secondary aims included examining bowel habit symptoms, complications and healthcare costs.
Methods
This clinical trial allocated patients randomly to standard postoperative care with or without chewing gum (sugar-free gum for at least 10 min, four times per day on days 1–5) in five UK hospitals.
The primary outcome was LOS.
Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios for LOS.
Results
Data from 402 of 412 patients, of whom 199 (49·5 per cent) were allocated to chewing gum, were available for analysis.
Some 40 per cent of patients in both groups had laparoscopic surgery, and all study sites used enhanced recovery programmes.
Median (i.
q.
r.
) LOS was 7 (5–11) days in both groups (P = 0·962); the hazard ratio for use of gum was 0·94 (95 per cent c.
i.
0·77 to 1·15; P = 0·557).
Participants allocated to gum had worse quality of life, measured using the EuroQoL 5D-3L, than controls at 6 and 12 weeks after operation (but not on day 4).
They also had more complications graded III or above according to the Dindo–Demartines–Clavien classification (16 versus 6 in the group that received standard care) and deaths (11 versus 0), but none was classed as related to gum.
No other differences were observed.
Conclusion
Chewing gum did not alter the return of bowel function or LOS after colorectal resection.
Registration number: ISRCTN55784442 (http://www.
controlled-trials.
com).
Related Results
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Review on Medicated Chewing Gum of Diasulfiram
Review on Medicated Chewing Gum of Diasulfiram
Since ancient times, chewing gum has been used to refresh breath and clean the mouth. In 1869, the first chewing gum patent was submitted, and in 1928, the first medicated chewing ...
Effects of regular and mastic chewing gum on alertness, mood, heart rate and EEG activity in adolescents: a pilot study
Effects of regular and mastic chewing gum on alertness, mood, heart rate and EEG activity in adolescents: a pilot study
Chewing gum has been associated with changes in alertness, mood, and cognitive performance. Natural mastic gum (Pistacia lentiscus resin) differs from commercial chewing gum in com...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Chewing gum, stress and health
Chewing gum, stress and health
AbstractHollingworth described chewing gum as ‘a technique of relaxation’. Recent research has examined this issue and there is evidence that chewing gum can prevent the adverse ef...
Effect of Gum Chewing for Early Restoration of Bowel Activity after Cesarean Section
Effect of Gum Chewing for Early Restoration of Bowel Activity after Cesarean Section
Background: Postoperative ileus is a common concern following cesarean section, leading to delayed gastrointestinal recovery. Chewing gum has emerged as a simple and non-invasive i...
Role of Gum Chewing in post-operative gut motility after Cesarean Section
Role of Gum Chewing in post-operative gut motility after Cesarean Section
Background: Postoperative ileus is a common complication following cesarean section, resulting in delayed bowel motility, abdominal discomfort, and prolonged hospital stay. Various...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...

